To what extent were the people of the Soviet Union better off in 1941 than in 1928 after thirteen years of Stalin's Russia?

Authors Avatar

To what extent were the people of the Soviet Union better off in 1941 than in 1928 after thirteen years of Stalin’s Russia?

When Stalin came to power conditions in Russia were very bad, both financially and generally. After 4 years of war, and 3 years of the civil war, the Russian people were on the verge of starvation, with many of their homes destroyed after the fighting. By 1921 the Kronstacht sailors began to revolt, wanting freedom and prosperity. Lenin had introduced the New Economic Policy to try and prevent any further revolts. This allowed economic freedom to some Russian people, and gave peasants the chance to become a lot more prosperous. However, only food production had increased, and industry had only risen a minor amount due to the products given to the Russian army during the war. So the Russian people were well off as far as food went, but industry was still undeveloped, because the workers were unmotivated to produce large amounts. So before Stalin came to power, the Russian people were starving, and those providing the food were getting little pay, due to the availability of food there was after NEP was introduced.

In 1928, Russia was two million tonnes short of the grain it needed to feed its workers, so Russian towns were in a state of famine. Stalin was aware of this lack of production in industry and knew he had to have as many workers working in industry as possible. Many farmers were only producing the minimum requirement, so that their food prices would not decrease. Thus, in 1929, Stalin introduced a policy of Collectivisation. The aim of collectivisation was to have more control over the peasants so that it would be more efficient and thus the surplus workers could work in the industry. The concept was that farmers would unite their farms together to create larger ones, called Kolkhozes. The government would run them and their aim was to produce a fixed amount of food for the government, any that was surplus was theirs to be shared. This allowed many peasants to leave their farms and start work in factories in the towns, which was what Stalin intended.

Ninety percent of produce made by each collective was sold straight to the state at a fixed price. In return the state made farming equipment freely available. For the peasants their main source of income had become their share in the Collective profits. Each member by default was given a house, livestock, tools and a garden in which to grow their own vegetables. This at least meant there was more certainty for the Russian peasants and they no longer had to worry about food or housing as long as they worked well.

Join now!

Collectivisation was met with mixed views from different divisions of the Russian society.  It was generally supported by the very poor peasants who realistically had little to lose. Young peasants gave in to the propaganda enforced on many people, and saw it as a good opportunity. However, many Kulaks were in opposition to this scheme, as they had been very prosperous under NEP. But now they had to sacrifice their profit and land, and now found themselves in the same situation as many poorer peasants. The kulaks began to rebel against collectivisation and within a short time, collectivisation became a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay