• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Treaty of Versailles

Extracts from this document...


In 1919, when the Treaty of Versailles was signed, those who signed it had been referred to in Germany as the 'November Criminals', for agreeing to a treaty that was far too harsh: it made Germany accept all the blame for the war, stripped it from its land, colonies, entire navy and merchant navy, and limited it to a tiny 100,000 men and six battleships, with no tanks, submarines or aircrafts. The French Prime Minister however, was criticised by his own people for not making the Treaty harsh enough, and was soon voted off power. Yet meanwhile, in Great Britain, David Lloyd George receives a hero's welcome upon his return, for treating Germany fairly in the eyes of the British public. The Treaty of Versailles does not necessarily have to be viewed as a harsh treaty. The war guilt clause, for example, was particularly insulting for the German people, yet they had after all, encouraged Austria to declare war on Serbia after Archduke Franz Ferdinand's assassination. By sending them a 'blank cheque' and promising full support against a war with Russia and Serbia, Germany was the driving factor behind Austria's decision to declare war on Serbia. ...read more.


a demilitarised zone. It was also these aggressive displays from Germany which made it understandable that they were denied a place in the League of Nations. It was justifiable, as Germany had shown that peaceful negotiations had not been her strong point. In addition, the denial of access into the League of Nations for Germany until it proved to be a peaceful nation provided incentive for Germany to settle disagreements in a non-violent manner. At the time of the signing of the Schlieffen Plan, the British public believed that the treaty fairly served justice. However, the German population, who believed they merely agreed to ceasefire rather than having lost the war, thought that the treaty was extremely harsh and unfair. Including this, they believed that the Treaty would be based on Wilson's fourteen points, which appealed to Germans much more than Lloyd George's or Clemenceau's ideas. The treaty had turned out to be very different than they had expected it to be. The War Guilt clause was a huge insult for the German people, and the clause which angered them the most. It was, to them, unfair. ...read more.


However, if they are not granted entry into the League of Nations, there is no longer the option of peaceful negotiation, leading directly to the violence that the denial of access had originally been trying to avoid. In conclusion, I believe that neither the initial reaction of the German, British or French people adequately showed how just the Treaty exactly was. It was not as harsh as Germany believed, and although a lot of land had been lost and the military had been greatly cut down, they do not realise that if Clemenceau had his way, it may have been much harsher. However, the treaty was quite harsh; the immense loss of land, splitting Germany into two, and the loss of self determination can be seen as incredibly harsh acts. The treaty did not fail because it was too harsh, as the Locarno honeymoon period proved that Germany were able to live with and accept this Treaty. In summary, although the Treaty was harsh, its harshness, for the most part, had been justifiable, and Germany did indeed deserve to be punished, but not as much as the Treaty of Versailles stated it should. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Treaty Of Versailles Justified?

    5 star(s)

    Count Brockdorff-Rantzau, saying, "The man who offered us 100 milliard gold marks at Versailles, which we unluckily refused."

  2. Was the ‘Liberal Internationalism’ espoused in 1919 destined to fail or merely a concept ...

    For Britain the English Channel was no longer the buffer it once was due to air warfare, although in its infancy. It was Woodrow Wilson who was willing, and indeed pushed for a more liberal course of action in the negotiations, since the US had entered the war late and

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Although the army was reduced, the generals were still there, and ready to rebuild. Isn't it hypocritical of Germany to complain and say they were tricked, when they had only taken the Fourteen Points seriously once they'd been beaten? They had also forced the harsh peace treaty of Brest-Litovsk on Russia in 1918 without worries.

  2. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    Sir Horace Rumbold who was a diplomat wanted a harsh punishment for the Germans, as there was an existing stereotype of Germans and felt that a harsh treaty would teach the Germans a lesson. �I hope the new armistice terms will be really stiff.� This showed some of the contemporary attitudes to the Germans especially those in the foreign office.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work