• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Tsar Nicholas II

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History coursework Was size the most important reason in making the Russian Empire of Tsar Nicholas II so difficult to rule in the years before the outbreak of the First World War? Russia was, and still is a very large country and this would affect the way that the country was governed, it would affect the communication of the ruler of the country, Tsar Nicholas II, and also the law and order, but there are also many other factors that would affect how well this large empire would be governed such as the competency of the leader and the attitude of the people that live in the country. So it is not just size that affects how difficult Russia was to govern but there were many other factors that affected the rule of this country. One way in which Russia was made difficult to govern was just the shear size of the country. In 1900 the Russian Empire stretched over 600km which is about 60 times the size of Great Britain, and it took 13 days to travel from one side of the country to the other on the Trans - Siberian railway. This meant that communication between Russia's people was very poor and that it was hard to enforce law and order. This made it hard to govern as Tsar Nicholas II just simply could not help all of his people at once since there was such a large gap between the people, and so communities ...read more.

Middle

One other way in which made Russia a badly governed country in the period was the competency of the Tsar. It wasn't just the size of Russia the affected the leadership, it was the leader himself. Tsar Nicholas II, although leader of Russia was not a great leader, he did not see his people he just believed that they were happy and that they did not need his help. Some noble Russians who were close to the Tsar would tell him what he wanted to hear and they would not explain the problems that needed to be resolved, and because the Tsar believed them he did not bother to visit his people, but continued to let them suffer. Nicholas was also a bad Tsar because he believed that democracy would lead to the downfall of Russia and so did not give any power to anybody else and so had very little help to govern the country and also his wife influenced him to much and got what she wanted, not what the people of Russia wanted. This was a short term cause and so this would not have affected any other previous tsars but was a problem of Tsar Nicholas. Another reason in which made the country of Russia governed badly was the opposition groups. These groups were called the: Liberals, Social Revolutionaries and the social democrats who where split up into the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nicholas had only one son out of 5 children called Alexei, who was heir to his throne, but unfortunately had a rare blood disease called haemophilia, this meant that his blood did not clot and so a minor cut meant that he could possibly bleed to death. This was not publicly known at this time as it could have affected the mood of the Russian people. Rasputin was known for his 'healing powers' and it is believed that whenever Alexei was bleeding and Rasputin was in the same room, the bleeding would stop. This ultimately led to Tsar Nicholas being influenced on his rule by Rasputin and this affected him badly. This meant that Rasputin would get what he wanted whilst some people in Nicholas' empire would be suffering and overall this made it difficult to govern this huge empire. This was only a short term effect and would not have been a problem for any previous Tsars. Overall, I believe that, although there are many different things and people that made it hard for Tsar Nicholas to govern the Russian empire before the first World War, but that size was the biggest factor in making Russia difficult to govern, even though so many Tsars before Nicholas had managed to handle the difficulties of looking after such a huge country. If Russia was half the size I think that Nicholas would have done a much better job of being Tsar and would have been a much more popular Tsar than he actually was. ?? ?? ?? ?? Guy Saunders ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

    5 star(s)

    "I visited the station there I saw 18,000 wounded men lying on the ground". Later in spring 1915 the Germans invaded and advanced over three hundred miles. This was when Nicholas decided to dismiss his chief minister and take the role on himself this was a mistake as now the Russian people blamed him not the ministers.

  2. What Were The Biggest Challenges Facing Nicholas II On His Accession To The Throne, ...

    Finally strip farming was still being used and this is not economically forward, this method was used in England many years before and more productive forms of farming had be found. Nicholas clearly faced vast problems with agriculture and I believe that this is his most important issue to tackle because farming also affects economical and social standards.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    capitalist nations and totally against communism and had to make Stalin's policies look bad compared to their western ways. The main aim of these cartoons was to portray a negative, manipulative and hatred side to Stalin. However, despite them being exaggerated, the Sources in my opinion are accurate and do

  2. Use source A and your knowledge of the period to explain why some people ...

    As well as the 'protective section' the Tsar had another group of thugs who were the 'Cossacks'. The Tsar had two groups of thugs obviously because the conditions in Russia were bad and the police needed more back up. The police report in source B also states that obtaining food was hard and queuing outside shops was useless.

  1. Stalins' Russia Coursework

    Explain why Stalin, not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's Successor When Lenin died in 1924, he left no known successor of his creation and work, although he had mentioned in his will that Stalin, by no means, should become to complete power and it was always thought that Trotsky would go on to succeed.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    Here a workers' state occupies the same position in regard to the whole economy as an individual capitalist occupies in the context of a single factory. For that very reason, the actions of the Soviet government over the past seven decades have played a decisive role - for good or ill - on economic development.

  1. Was size the most important reason in making the Russian Empire of Tsar Nicholas ...

    Whenever he did feel threatened in his own country he would send out the Cossacks who were skilled mounted soldiers who would slaughter and kill anyone that opposed him. He also used the secret police, the Okhrana to spy on people and crush any dissent.

  2. Investigate the changes that took place in Horsforth between 1700 and 1900

    we will probably find that a lot of the land was used industrial purposes like factories or residential areas. 2. Census The census will allow us to get information on the type of work the people of Horsforth did and its population, if Horsforth was a industrialised town after the Industrial Revolution(which we are trying to prove)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work