• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Tsar of All the Russias" cartoon. Document Analysis & Bloody Sunday Historiography

Extracts from this document...


The Tsar of All the Russias - SAC Practice Questions a) Identify two symbols of the Tsar's autocratic power in the representation - His jewelled crown - The Romanov double-headed eagle image b) Identify two features (not listed in response a) above) shown in the representation which symbolise the Bloody Sunday massacre in January 1905. - The worker lying dead - The petition in his hands c) Using your knowledge, explain what this portrayal of the Tsar suggests about the events of January 1905. On the 22nd of January 1905 a huge crowd of 100,000 - 150,000 Russians attempted to peacefully march to the Winter Palace to present the Tsar with a petition that 135,000 workers had signed. ...read more.


This caricature shows the Tsar as having an attitude of death towards his people, represented by his skeleton body, still clutching his sceptre and wearing his royal garb. The artist has also drawn the petition the marchers aimed to present to the Tsar abnormally large, suggesting it was of great importance. The event of Bloody Sunday was important because it was a turning point in the relationship the Tsar had with the people of Russia. Their view of him changed from their "Little Father" to "Nicholas the Bloody" and their trust and respect for their leader was forever damaged. ...read more.


Historian Michael Lynch contends that even though the Tsar wasn't even there at the time of the Massacre and he was not at fault, the events which took place "gravely damaged the traditional image of the tsar..." Richard Malone, however, criticises the Tsar for not considering the requests in the petition and responding with violence. He does share the same opinion with Lynch that the significance of this event was great because the breakdown of trust between the Tsar and his people began here. Because this illustration is essentially a piece of propaganda it is not a reliable source in understanding the Tsar's role in the Bloody Sunday Massacre. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    reform programmes continued up until his death on 20th February, 1997, just four months away from the handover of Hong Kong back to Chinese sovereignty. There was no power struggle after Deng's death like that that had occurred after the death of Mao.

  2. Dairy Extract Of A Soldier and Worker Who Marched On Bloody Sunday

    The Tsar was actually in St Petersburg at the time so it was the truth. At this point I didn't feel I could lie to my people so I was happy the Tsar was really out. We told them they were here for nothing and to go back to their

  1. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    I think this because the writer of this article could have easily tampered with the correct details of that day. The report seems to be quite biased towards the marchers and because the writer was only in one place he only saw the events in one place whereas the Tsar would have been told what happened everywhere.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This is because she says that her husband fired the shots too. This contradicts what source E days because in source D, Medvedev told the whites that he was told to go outside to see whether the shots could be heard by anyone.

  1. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    This is contradicted by sources such as source D, which says that the entire family was killed, and that, 'the corpses were taken out to a lorry'. On the other hand, there are a number of points, which suggest that the two sources are reliable.

  2. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    was, trying to create a very reliable source, but the way the are written and facts have been interpreted means that they are not wholly reliable. Question B) How far does the account in source C differ from those in sources A and B?

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This was written before source B which states that there was no real evidence as to who or how many victims were killed. The differences between sources A and B are: 1. Source B states what happened to some of the family members: unlike source A B states what happened to certain family members.

  2. What Happened on Bloody Sunday 22nd January 1905?

    The people who had come in peace carrying icons and pictures of their Tsar were fired upon by the Semenovsky regiment and collided with mounted Cossacks. Over 500 people were killed and 3000 or more were wounded. It was a day when the Tsars grip over Russia slipped even more.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work