• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Tsar of All the Russias" cartoon. Document Analysis & Bloody Sunday Historiography

Extracts from this document...


The Tsar of All the Russias - SAC Practice Questions a) Identify two symbols of the Tsar's autocratic power in the representation - His jewelled crown - The Romanov double-headed eagle image b) Identify two features (not listed in response a) above) shown in the representation which symbolise the Bloody Sunday massacre in January 1905. - The worker lying dead - The petition in his hands c) Using your knowledge, explain what this portrayal of the Tsar suggests about the events of January 1905. On the 22nd of January 1905 a huge crowd of 100,000 - 150,000 Russians attempted to peacefully march to the Winter Palace to present the Tsar with a petition that 135,000 workers had signed. ...read more.


This caricature shows the Tsar as having an attitude of death towards his people, represented by his skeleton body, still clutching his sceptre and wearing his royal garb. The artist has also drawn the petition the marchers aimed to present to the Tsar abnormally large, suggesting it was of great importance. The event of Bloody Sunday was important because it was a turning point in the relationship the Tsar had with the people of Russia. Their view of him changed from their "Little Father" to "Nicholas the Bloody" and their trust and respect for their leader was forever damaged. ...read more.


Historian Michael Lynch contends that even though the Tsar wasn't even there at the time of the Massacre and he was not at fault, the events which took place "gravely damaged the traditional image of the tsar..." Richard Malone, however, criticises the Tsar for not considering the requests in the petition and responding with violence. He does share the same opinion with Lynch that the significance of this event was great because the breakdown of trust between the Tsar and his people began here. Because this illustration is essentially a piece of propaganda it is not a reliable source in understanding the Tsar's role in the Bloody Sunday Massacre. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The Examination of One of Russia's Greatest Leaders - Peter the Great

    A little later, Sofia was made regent with the justification that the sickly and feeble-minded Ivan was unable to rule. From 1682 to 1689 Sofia and her associates controlled Muscovy, while Peter I spent time with the Naryshkin party in the village of Preobrazhenskoye.

  2. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    I think this because the writer of this article could have easily tampered with the correct details of that day. The report seems to be quite biased towards the marchers and because the writer was only in one place he only saw the events in one place whereas the Tsar would have been told what happened everywhere.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    unreliable to a certain extent as he may have been forced or threatened by the White interviewers to say against the Reds in order to save himself from further torture. Alternatively, the fact that he was in charge of the men guarding the Russian Royal family and hence being a

  2. Stalin Souurces Questions

    However by looking at the photograph alone we can see that it is very much positive. In it Stalin is shaking the hands of the wives of army officers, congratulating them. He is smiling and the women want to shake his hand indicating that the women do not see him as some sort of evil person.

  1. Dairy Extract Of A Soldier and Worker Who Marched On Bloody Sunday

    Eventually I caught up with her. She saw I was alone and instantly knew I had not only lost Emily temporarily but that we had lost her forever. I could see the pain in her eyes and she stopped. I tried to pull her forward but she refused and swung around to go and find her body.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    of administering the state and directing the organisational development of socialist society." (LCW, Vol. 26, p. 409.) The myth of the Constituent Assembly Among all the numerous legends put in circulation in order to portray the October Revolution in an unfavourable light, that of the Constituent Assembly is perhaps the most persistent.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    They both state they the have no evidence on the corpses. However they both re-enact this in different ways. Source A doesn't give information about the corpses. However it does state that Sergeyev had all the evidence connecting Romanov's case.

  2. What Happened on Bloody Sunday 22nd January 1905?

    The people who had come in peace carrying icons and pictures of their Tsar were fired upon by the Semenovsky regiment and collided with mounted Cossacks. Over 500 people were killed and 3000 or more were wounded. It was a day when the Tsars grip over Russia slipped even more.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work