• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Tsar of All the Russias" cartoon. Document Analysis & Bloody Sunday Historiography

Extracts from this document...


The Tsar of All the Russias - SAC Practice Questions a) Identify two symbols of the Tsar's autocratic power in the representation - His jewelled crown - The Romanov double-headed eagle image b) Identify two features (not listed in response a) above) shown in the representation which symbolise the Bloody Sunday massacre in January 1905. - The worker lying dead - The petition in his hands c) Using your knowledge, explain what this portrayal of the Tsar suggests about the events of January 1905. On the 22nd of January 1905 a huge crowd of 100,000 - 150,000 Russians attempted to peacefully march to the Winter Palace to present the Tsar with a petition that 135,000 workers had signed. ...read more.


This caricature shows the Tsar as having an attitude of death towards his people, represented by his skeleton body, still clutching his sceptre and wearing his royal garb. The artist has also drawn the petition the marchers aimed to present to the Tsar abnormally large, suggesting it was of great importance. The event of Bloody Sunday was important because it was a turning point in the relationship the Tsar had with the people of Russia. Their view of him changed from their "Little Father" to "Nicholas the Bloody" and their trust and respect for their leader was forever damaged. ...read more.


Historian Michael Lynch contends that even though the Tsar wasn't even there at the time of the Massacre and he was not at fault, the events which took place "gravely damaged the traditional image of the tsar..." Richard Malone, however, criticises the Tsar for not considering the requests in the petition and responding with violence. He does share the same opinion with Lynch that the significance of this event was great because the breakdown of trust between the Tsar and his people began here. Because this illustration is essentially a piece of propaganda it is not a reliable source in understanding the Tsar's role in the Bloody Sunday Massacre. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Mao was more concerned with the physical side of teaching people. Under Deng more encouragement was given to progress in education. Once education was complete the people had a choice of jobs, they could now go for technical or skilled jobs with large pay.

  2. Dairy Extract Of A Soldier and Worker Who Marched On Bloody Sunday

    Eventually I caught up with her. She saw I was alone and instantly knew I had not only lost Emily temporarily but that we had lost her forever. I could see the pain in her eyes and she stopped. I tried to pull her forward but she refused and swung around to go and find her body.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    As source F is a photograph, it could be useful because it shows where the Romanov family were supposedly shop. It could also be a little un-useful because the photo could have possibly been tampered with, and therefore changing it to make it look worse than it probably was.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    Each source also mentions the use of guns, as source A says, 'I believe, however, that the Tsar, the family doctor, two servants and the maid were shot in the Ipatiev House', whilst source B also quotes, 'where the Tsar is supposed to have been shot'.

  1. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    I think this because the writer of this article could have easily tampered with the correct details of that day. The report seems to be quite biased towards the marchers and because the writer was only in one place he only saw the events in one place whereas the Tsar would have been told what happened everywhere.

  2. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    Source A is an extract from an American newspaper report, published in December 1918, so about five months after the disappearance of the Romanov family. It was written to inform the American public of what was happening in Russia at the time, maybe explaining one of the factors of the Russian civil war, which was raging at the time.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This was written before source B which states that there was no real evidence as to who or how many victims were killed. The differences between sources A and B are: 1. Source B states what happened to some of the family members: unlike source A B states what happened to certain family members.

  2. What Happened on Bloody Sunday 22nd January 1905?

    Why did Nicholas survive the 1905 revolution? It took the Tsar some time to respond to the many events that were going on in and around 1905 such as the national uprisings in Poland, Finland and Georgia, the assassination of the Tsars uncle, the industrial unrest that every town had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work