• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Tsar of All the Russias" cartoon. Document Analysis & Bloody Sunday Historiography

Extracts from this document...


The Tsar of All the Russias - SAC Practice Questions a) Identify two symbols of the Tsar's autocratic power in the representation - His jewelled crown - The Romanov double-headed eagle image b) Identify two features (not listed in response a) above) shown in the representation which symbolise the Bloody Sunday massacre in January 1905. - The worker lying dead - The petition in his hands c) Using your knowledge, explain what this portrayal of the Tsar suggests about the events of January 1905. On the 22nd of January 1905 a huge crowd of 100,000 - 150,000 Russians attempted to peacefully march to the Winter Palace to present the Tsar with a petition that 135,000 workers had signed. ...read more.


This caricature shows the Tsar as having an attitude of death towards his people, represented by his skeleton body, still clutching his sceptre and wearing his royal garb. The artist has also drawn the petition the marchers aimed to present to the Tsar abnormally large, suggesting it was of great importance. The event of Bloody Sunday was important because it was a turning point in the relationship the Tsar had with the people of Russia. Their view of him changed from their "Little Father" to "Nicholas the Bloody" and their trust and respect for their leader was forever damaged. ...read more.


Historian Michael Lynch contends that even though the Tsar wasn't even there at the time of the Massacre and he was not at fault, the events which took place "gravely damaged the traditional image of the tsar..." Richard Malone, however, criticises the Tsar for not considering the requests in the petition and responding with violence. He does share the same opinion with Lynch that the significance of this event was great because the breakdown of trust between the Tsar and his people began here. Because this illustration is essentially a piece of propaganda it is not a reliable source in understanding the Tsar's role in the Bloody Sunday Massacre. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The arrest of the Gang of Four was greeted with demonstrations in support of the arrests in every major city in China, including Jiang Qing's stronghold of Shanghai. Hua was now in control, but only as a stopgap. He was acceptable to a wide spectrum of the Party, being centre-left:

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    The introduction of the New Economic Policy (NEP) meant that the peasants were allowed to sell their grain on the market, in exchange for a tax to the state. After this measure, there were no more Kronstadts and Tambovs. The peasants had got what they wanted. Was the NEP a step forward for the working class and the revolution?

  1. Dairy Extract Of A Soldier and Worker Who Marched On Bloody Sunday

    Eventually I caught up with her. She saw I was alone and instantly knew I had not only lost Emily temporarily but that we had lost her forever. I could see the pain in her eyes and she stopped. I tried to pull her forward but she refused and swung around to go and find her body.

  2. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    I think this because the writer of this article could have easily tampered with the correct details of that day. The report seems to be quite biased towards the marchers and because the writer was only in one place he only saw the events in one place whereas the Tsar would have been told what happened everywhere.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This makes it hard to work out whether Sokolov was telling the truth or making everything up. He wrote it for a book, but parts of it never got published. This makes you wonder whether parts of the source could be false.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    However, the reliability of such sources is, in turn, questionable. Source A is also challenged by source C, which says, 'Sergeyev, on handing the case to me, had no doubt about the fact that the entire Romanov family had been massacred in the Ipatiev House', whilst Source A, which is

  1. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    As I have already established both authors of the sources received some of their information from the white investigator Judge Sergeyev, who was sacked from the case in January 1919. It is unknown why he was sacked, and his findings were never published, his thoughts and opinions are only known from what other people have said in sources like these.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Also the American newspaper and the British government may have censored some part of the investigation of the deaths of the bodies. 3. They don't have any evidence on the corpses: as I said before that both of the sources were secondary so they might have found evidence of the copses however decided to censor some parts of the report.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work