• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Tsarism in Russia had been made secure by 1914." How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ong Dai Lin 02A03 11-5-03 Q: "Tsarism in Russia had been made secure by 1914." How far do you agree with this statement? Although the 1905 Revolution did not bring Tsarism to its demise, it had important consequences on Tsarism. It illuminates the problems of Russian society and exposed the government's weaknesses. Nevertheless, the Tsar managed to suppress his opponents and appeased the masses, saving his regimes from collapse. However, this security was only temporarily as the root of Russia's problems were not solved and WWI in 1914 was the last straw for the decaying regime. Hence, I agree with the statement to a large extent. The inherent problems in Russian society were never dealt with properly by the Tsar. The peasants suffered from the problem of land hunger, the workers had poor working conditions and almost everyone wanted reforms, leading to the outbreak of the 1905 Revolution. Although this revolution posed a threat to Tsarism at its outbreak, it was a threat that the Tsar quickly overcomes. Concessions were granted to gain support for the Tsar and the policy of repression was used to get rid of those who still challenged the government. More importantly, the army did not go over to the side of the rebels. ...read more.

Middle

This helped to appease the peasants and their anger towards the Tsar slowly died down. By 1915, nearly 50% of the peasantry enjoyed hereditary ownership of their land, as compared to lower than 20% in the past. The drop in the number of land seizures by the peasants and the decline in the general lawlessness in the countryside are proof that the peasants were generally more satisfied with the Tsar now. The rest of the Tsar's opponents that were still not won over were suppressed I the Tsar's efforts to further consolidate his position. Having won over the peasants and the liberals, the government was left with the opposition of the workers. The army was used to crush the soviets. In December 1906, an insurrection in Moscow was crushed by the army, taking about 1200 rebel lifes. Mutinous veterans were suppressed along the route of the Trans-Siberian Railway. Field court-martial was used to deal with terrorists and rural troublemakers. Pressure was added upon the press and the unions to attack the bases of radical politics. In 1908, the number of political assassinations had dropped to 365, showing the Tsar had effectively curbed his opponents and in doing so, securing his power. Hence, despite its unpopularity, the Tsar had managed to survive the 1905 Revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

His personal image was greatly tainted by the Bloody Sunday incident. Through the incident, the masses lost their faith and respect for the Tsar, seeing that he was not the 'Little Father' they could depend on to alleviate their sufferings. Hence, his legitimacy to rule was greatly shaken. It was only with the reforms he grudgingly gave after the incident that helped to appease the people and allow him to stay in power. Now that his incompetence was getting increasingly obvious with the sufferings of his people, he was in a very vulnerable position. Hence, by 1914, Tsarism was not secured to a great extent. Social strife was continual. Political opposition remained strident and determined. The monarchy was ever more regarded as an oppressive and obsolescent institution that failed to cater to the people's needs. Although having recovered from the 1905 Revolution, the basic tensions in Russia had not been alleviated. Time had been bought for Tsarism but the Tsar failed to make use of this window of opportunity tro change his ways. Hence, this was a time of lost opportunity for Tsarism to redeem itself. All it needed was a trigger to set off the masses on Tsarism and this trigger came in the form of WWI in 1914. The fact that Tsarism was destroyed so fast when WWI came also gave a strong indication that it had been standing on shaky ground and was hence not secured. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    Whereas in 1801 the number of workers in Petrograd averaged around 95,000, by 1896 the number had dramatically grown to around 1,742,000. This growth was mainly due to the heavy flow of foreign capital into Russia, as by 1914 one third of capital invested in Russian stock companies was foreign.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    They used the Manifesto to persuade people to bring back peace, which is critical for the survival and prosperity of the Tsarist government. The number of strikes in 1905 was a good example for this. In general, it seems that Russia was gradually modernizing and this supports Kokovstov's view.

  1. Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism.

    The Tsar made a very bad choice when he decided to go and take charge of the army himself. He knew that they were losing, so he could have just pulled out at any time and had a chance to save Russia.

  2. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    The Social Revolutionary party also agreed with the peasants and wanted them to start a Revolution. This I believe this didn't secure the regime entirely as peasants, and middle class were very unhappy with the Tsarist system and thus they could pose a threat to the regime as the population

  1. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    as the Russian Social Democratic party in 1898 (which later split into the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks). These revolutionary parties had a broad propaganda role which helped undermine loyalty to the regime, especially amongst the workers and soldiers. This was coupled with the wide range of nationalities in Russia who on the most part wanted to overthrow the Tsar.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    This was not a war as such but a period of hostile relations between the Capitalist Western countries and the communist Russians. The source portrays the people beneath Stalin as not caring about the people. We know this because the source says, 'Why should we be concerned about men?

  1. "There was widespread support for the Tsar before 1914"

    In addition to this, another reason why there was not a widespread support for the Tsar is because he kept living and working conditions poor. We can tell this in source A because it says that in 1912, two hundred and seventy miners were shot dead during a strike.

  2. Which of the following views best explain the fall of Tsarism of Russia?

    Although he quotes that Russia would have prospered if it were not for the war, he was still an opponent of Autocracy. He believed that the Tsar should have modernized and delegated some power to his ministers. Kokovstov says that the war was the catalyst that started the fall of Tsarism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work