• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Tsarist rule in the years 1856-1917 and communist rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depend on high degrees of central control by the state.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Tsarist rule in the years 1856-1917 and communist rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depend on high degrees of central control by the state. The similarities between the two forms of government were therefore much greater than the differences" How far do you agree with this judgement? From 1856-1917, up until a communist takeover, the USSR had three Tsarist rulers, Alexander II (the Reformer 1855-1881), Alexander III (the reactionary Tsar 1881-1894) and Nicholas (1894-1917). After the February Revolution of 1917, Lenin took control forcibly through the Civil War, but died in 1924. After several years of fighting opposition, Stalin took power in the late 1920's after antagonism from Leon Trotsky. His murderous regime however ended in 1953 in a peaceful death. Throughout the period of time that Russia was under the rule of the Romanov dynasty, [C-300] the Tsars ruled by divine right. This made them respectable and looked at as god like figures by the empire; it was therefore the Church and religion of Russia which consolidated the Tsars position as the 'father' of Russia. The autocratic monarchy of Russia was unfair and unrepresentative of the Russian people, as the majority did not have the right to vote, let alone its peasant class accounting for almost eighty five percent of the total population. ...read more.

Middle

The Fundamental laws did however disappoint the hopes of liberals for political power. Voting became indirect - one gentry vote carried as much weight as 3 burgher, 15 peasant or 45 worker votes. The government hoped that by reducing the workers votes, the Duma would be less hostile. The Duma itself was composed of elected representatives, and had the rights of voting legislation, including the budget, and questioning ministers. The role of Commander-in-Chief of the army meant that Nicholas was frequently away from home, leaving an incompetent Tsarina and Rasputin at the centre of Russia. Due to the Tsarinas German decent, it was dislike highly for her to be left in control of Russia, but it was a method of him redeeming control. When the Duma met in April 1906, it was dominated by liberal parties, with the Constitutional Democrats, or Kadets being the largest party. They were determined to press for a Constituent Assembly that would draw up a real constitution for Russia. The government, believing that the majority of peasant voters would ensure a conservative Duma, was shocked by the demands of the Duma, and dissolved it almost immediately. By the time of Lenin's death in 1924, the communists had eliminated all political opposition in Russia. ...read more.

Conclusion

After the widespread purges of the Communist party itself, Stalin now decided to purge the Red Army. Some historians believe that Stalin was telling the truth when he claimed that he had evidence that the army was planning a military coup at this time. In June, 1937, Mikhail Tukhachevsky and seven other top Red Army commanders were charged with conspiracy with Germany. All eight were convicted and executed. All told, 30,000 members of the armed forces were executed. This included fifty per cent of all army officers. Stalin did this to create a state that would comply by his communist views and none other. Stalin also used propaganda in order to gain control the USSR. Through the newspapers, 'Pravda' and 'Izvestia', Stalin had full censorship over what was and what was not to be published in his Empire. Extensive measures were taken such as the re-publication of textbooks throughout schools in an act of Russification. This would enable Stalin to have only his message put across to the people who were to be the future of the USSR. From examining the question and looking into information providing examples of acts carried out by the Romanov Tsars and communists from the death of Lenin to that of Stalin, it is apparent that both forms of government used central control by the state to an extent. This makes the similarities between the two forms of government greater than the differences, but once again, only to an extent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    In conclusion, although the five-year plans did bring glory to Stalin, the fact that it inspired the Russian public to work harder than ever and the fact that the whole Russian economy was raised by quite a great deal proves that glory was not the only way in which it was seen.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    There is no doubt that the 1st five year-plan was successful but it was at the expense of the people's lives. The citizens found work very difficult. Factory discipline was very harsh. If a person failed to go to work they could have been executed.

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    We know that in Russia, soldiers mutinied because of several factors; poor living conditions, underpay, heavy defeats, poor leadership, being forced to fire upon innocent protesters, and not having any say as to how Russia was run. The source doesn't tell us that these are the reasons for mutiny.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    The rapid industrialisation improved life for most people in the cities as the new huge steel mills erecting at Magnitogorsk in the Urals and the new dams and hydroelectric powers (providing the heavy industries' energy requirements) had become sheer employment centres.

  1. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    consequences maybe if they tried to oppose the Tsar and therefore it brought a sense of fear in the lives of the Russian people not to oppose the tsar. It was a brutalising experience. The military reforms of 1874 meant that men would have to serve at least six years

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    These soldiers were the newest recruits; they were mostly peasants in uniform. These soldiers where newly trained and inexperienced or unable to serve at the front because of war injuries. The soldiers were not disciplined in the Russian army. They were often cold or hungry.

  1. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    The unpredictability that lead to so many people fearing him. This stopped people opposing him, and by removing senior party members he was getting rid of any rivals that may threaten his region as Russian leader. In a way, it also gained him a little trust, as he was shown

  2. The return of Lenin

    * They won an overall majority in elections to the Petrograd soviet and Leon Trotsky, a recent recruit to the Bolsheviks, and were elected chairman. * Meanwhile the situation in the rest of Russia was deteriorating fast. * In the countryside, the peasants were taking land at an increased rate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work