• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Tsarist rule in the years 1856-1917 and communist rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depend on high degrees of central control by the state.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Tsarist rule in the years 1856-1917 and communist rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depend on high degrees of central control by the state. The similarities between the two forms of government were therefore much greater than the differences" How far do you agree with this judgement? From 1856-1917, up until a communist takeover, the USSR had three Tsarist rulers, Alexander II (the Reformer 1855-1881), Alexander III (the reactionary Tsar 1881-1894) and Nicholas (1894-1917). After the February Revolution of 1917, Lenin took control forcibly through the Civil War, but died in 1924. After several years of fighting opposition, Stalin took power in the late 1920's after antagonism from Leon Trotsky. His murderous regime however ended in 1953 in a peaceful death. Throughout the period of time that Russia was under the rule of the Romanov dynasty, [C-300] the Tsars ruled by divine right. This made them respectable and looked at as god like figures by the empire; it was therefore the Church and religion of Russia which consolidated the Tsars position as the 'father' of Russia. The autocratic monarchy of Russia was unfair and unrepresentative of the Russian people, as the majority did not have the right to vote, let alone its peasant class accounting for almost eighty five percent of the total population. ...read more.

Middle

The Fundamental laws did however disappoint the hopes of liberals for political power. Voting became indirect - one gentry vote carried as much weight as 3 burgher, 15 peasant or 45 worker votes. The government hoped that by reducing the workers votes, the Duma would be less hostile. The Duma itself was composed of elected representatives, and had the rights of voting legislation, including the budget, and questioning ministers. The role of Commander-in-Chief of the army meant that Nicholas was frequently away from home, leaving an incompetent Tsarina and Rasputin at the centre of Russia. Due to the Tsarinas German decent, it was dislike highly for her to be left in control of Russia, but it was a method of him redeeming control. When the Duma met in April 1906, it was dominated by liberal parties, with the Constitutional Democrats, or Kadets being the largest party. They were determined to press for a Constituent Assembly that would draw up a real constitution for Russia. The government, believing that the majority of peasant voters would ensure a conservative Duma, was shocked by the demands of the Duma, and dissolved it almost immediately. By the time of Lenin's death in 1924, the communists had eliminated all political opposition in Russia. ...read more.

Conclusion

After the widespread purges of the Communist party itself, Stalin now decided to purge the Red Army. Some historians believe that Stalin was telling the truth when he claimed that he had evidence that the army was planning a military coup at this time. In June, 1937, Mikhail Tukhachevsky and seven other top Red Army commanders were charged with conspiracy with Germany. All eight were convicted and executed. All told, 30,000 members of the armed forces were executed. This included fifty per cent of all army officers. Stalin did this to create a state that would comply by his communist views and none other. Stalin also used propaganda in order to gain control the USSR. Through the newspapers, 'Pravda' and 'Izvestia', Stalin had full censorship over what was and what was not to be published in his Empire. Extensive measures were taken such as the re-publication of textbooks throughout schools in an act of Russification. This would enable Stalin to have only his message put across to the people who were to be the future of the USSR. From examining the question and looking into information providing examples of acts carried out by the Romanov Tsars and communists from the death of Lenin to that of Stalin, it is apparent that both forms of government used central control by the state to an extent. This makes the similarities between the two forms of government greater than the differences, but once again, only to an extent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    He became nationally famous and was used to encourage workers to work harder. The government would reward good workers with higher wages and pensions, better housing and awards. Workers who achieved mass production such as 'Aleksei Stakhanov' were called 'Stakhanovites'.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    to meet the threat of Germany as, Hitler had plans for Lebensraum and he was against Communism. The third plan only lasted for three and half years due to World War Two. All resources were concentrated on war machinery as Russia concentrated on war against Germany.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Even though some factory workers tried to escape the brutal work and harsh regulations, Stalin proved too clever for them as his secret police introduced internal passports to prevent open transfers of workers from one firm to another in the USSR.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    We know that in Russia, soldiers mutinied because of several factors; poor living conditions, underpay, heavy defeats, poor leadership, being forced to fire upon innocent protesters, and not having any say as to how Russia was run. The source doesn't tell us that these are the reasons for mutiny.

  1. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    So, when Alexandra and Rasputin got close as we can we see in a letter stolen from Rasputin that was written by Alexandra, "My much loved never to be forgotten teacher. I am so wretched without you. My soul is only rested and at easy when you my teacher are near me.

  2. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    These were unpopular as men were the providers for their families, so their families would also suffer because of their absence. Although the Tsars of Russia ruled autocratically and no political parties were allowed to exist, this did not mean that there was no organised opposition to their rule.

  1. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    as the truthful Communist, who was loyal to his country, and wanted the best for it. Propaganda And The Cult Of Personality. During the purges, Stalin had many innocent people killed or removed from society to be put in gulags.

  2. Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree ...

    In addition, the physical absence of Lenin during the period before his arrival in Petrograd in April 1917 substantiates the idea that, in reality, Lenin only had an indirect influence over his own parties. Lenin's influence was limited to what "he could achieve by his journalism and his correspondence."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work