• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

' Tzarist Rule In the Years 1856-1917 and Communist Rule From the Death of Lenin To the Death of Stalin Depended On High Degrees of Central Power and Control By the State. the Similarities Between the Two Forms of Government Were Therefore Much Greate...

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

' TZARIST RULE IN THE YEARS 1856-1917 AND COMMUNIST RULE FROM THE DEATH OF LENIN TO THE DEATH OF STALIN DEPENDED ON HIGH DEGREES OF CENTRAL POWER AND CONTROL BY THE STATE. THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE TWO FORMS OF GOVERNMENT WERE THEREFORE MUCH GREATER THAN THE DIFFERENCES.' HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT? Both forms of government did depend on high degree of central control. However, some Tsars and Stalin exerted more central controls than others. Stalin's stronger use of central control created differences between the two forms of government. The Tsars used different levels of central control. Alexander II used very little. He had emancipated the serfs, created the zemstva and allowed freedom of religion. Alexander III most resembled Stalin by using the most central controls. He also increased the power of his Predecessors secret police, renaming them the Okrana. The Okrana were similar to Stalin's secret police (NKVD.) Both were violent against minority groups and Russian's opposing the state. They could arrest anyone on suspicion of being an enemy of the state without any evidence. But Stalin used the NKVD as a central control to a bigger extent than the Tsar. During the purges (1934-38) the NKVD were vital. They arrested twenty million people in 1937 and created fear amongst communist workers, which became their biggest motivator. ...read more.

Middle

Which was even less than the amount produced in 1913. Agriculture policies failed for Russia throughout both Tsarist and Communist rule. Hence the great need for Khrushchev to try to modernise agriculture. However, collectivisation was a success for state because it did appear communism worked, which had been Stalin's main aim. He had managed to collectivise the country in four years and peasants were too scared of the NKVD to rebel. They scrutinised them in the Mechanical Tractor Stations but although peasants did not rebel, the peasants incentive disappeared which is why grain productivity had fallen in 1934. A similar reason agriculture did not improve in Tsarist and Communist Russia was peasant conservatism. In Tsarist Russia the peasants had not wanted to use new farming methods and liked the security of the Mir which was why in 1914 the number of kulaks was limited and Stolypin had only managed to use his strip system on 10% of the land and under Stalin the peasants had refused new machinery, this meant agriculture could not progress for both governments and they had to focus on how to deal with the peasants rather than the actual policy itself. The peasants had no incentive to grow food, they received no reward and did not see the point in growing the food so that the NKVD could take it away. ...read more.

Conclusion

Agriculture was also a failure for both forms of government. Neither forms of governments managed to give peasants an incentive and change their conservative views, Harold Stukman; "A minority achieved success as independent farmers, while the majority were unable to withstand rising taxes." Brian Moynahal; "A quarter of cattle, sheep and goats, and a third of pigs were slaughtered in 1930 by peasants who were determined that they should not be given to the collective." However, there were some major differences between the two forms of government. As time progressed the Tsars lost support from the nobles and power, after 1905 revolution Nicholas II had very little central control. But Stalin's dictatorship increased in strength and by 1938, the purges had made Russian's so fearful, they were willing to accept the totalitarian ruler instead of the democratic system which had originally been hoped for in the February 1917 revolution. Stalin had also used fear as a motivator for workers and managed to industrialise. Overall the most similarities occur between Alexander III and Stalin due to their repressive actions but although all the Tsars and Stalin depended on central control, it cannot be said that there were more similarities because of the power and support for Stalin's when his reign ended compared to the weak Tsarist system which Russians felt was not worth saving. Total Word Count 3247 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    Still there were huge advances in industrialisation, and the second Five Year Plan actually achieved its targets ahead of schedule. This was an incredible achievement for Russia. The industrialisation unemployment in Russia decreased. Lots of jobs were created in the new factories.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    time (source E was published in 1917, but it must still have taken time to be made, so the two sources both refer to the same time period). The third paragraph of source F is also reliable as it depicts discontent and lack of confidence from the Russian people - we know that this was happening from historical knowledge.

  1. How secure was the Tsar's powers up to 1904?

    His information on what was going on came from his ministers. Who did not always tell him exactly what was going on. The Tsarina Alexandra, Nicholas wife, had a very different type of personality. Although shy she was strong willed and obstinate.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    Nicholas suddenly had hatred for Witte making him agree to the October Manifesto. While Witte was trying to form a new government, the Liberals refused to help him. Leaving him to resign. In January 1906 Social Revolutionaries launched a new campaign of terror in the countryside to make people lose faith in the government.

  1. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    Russia did come about many benefits form the five year plans. Many new industrial areas were formed in the East such as the Urals. This in turn caused an increase in production and therefore an improve economy. By the end of the 1930's the conditions for workers greatly increased.

  2. Stalin and Lenin

    Lenin had such a good impact that when he died the Russian people decided to dedicate a city in his name which is Leningrad. Lenin created the Soviet Union which was one of the most powerful forces after World War 2, so this proved that although Lenin was ruthless he

  1. Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree ...

    In addition, the physical absence of Lenin during the period before his arrival in Petrograd in April 1917 substantiates the idea that, in reality, Lenin only had an indirect influence over his own parties. Lenin's influence was limited to what "he could achieve by his journalism and his correspondence."

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    No one will help you if you yourselves do not unite and take into your hands all affairs of state´┐Ż Get on with the job yourselves; begin right at the bottom, do not wait for anyone." (LCW, Vol. 26, p.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work