• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Use this source and your own knowledge to explain how useful this account of the events of 27th February is. Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


Question 2 Use this source and your own knowledge to explain how useful this account of the events of 27th February is. Explain your answer. Source C is an extract from a book called 'My part in Germanys Flight' published in Germany in 1935. Josef Goebbels, the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, wrote the book. As Minister of Propaganda, it was Josef Goebbels job to gain support for the Nazi party. He is not going to portray the Nazis in a negative way. Anything he says is likely to make the Nazis seem like a decent party and possibly make the communists (the Nazis main opposition) ...read more.


If the fire had happened today in the year 2003, firefighters would not have been able to establish the cause of the fire so quickly, let alone in 1933. According to Goebbels, there was "no doubt" that the Communists were responsible for starting the fire and had done it in order to create "an atmosphere of panic and terror". This is only one mans opinion and that man is a leading Nazi. This is a Nazis version of events. Obviously the Nazis are going to accuse the Communists of starting the fire so they can get rid of them as they pose a strong threat to the Nazis. ...read more.


confessed that he "set fire to [the Reichstag]". However all these sources have reliability problems. Source C is not particularly useful for studying the events of 27th February because it can be shown to be unreliable. The Source is full of Goebbels' opinions, also, as Goebbels was Minister of Propaganda it is probably filled with lies and half-truths. Goebbels published this book two years after the Reichstag fire. At this period of time (1935) the Nazis had not been in power for long and perhaps they were facing threats from the Communists. This book may have been published in order to twist people's perceptions of the communists and view them in a negative way. Although the source is clearly unreliable, it is useful as an example of Goebbels work as Minister of Propaganda. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Source D is the cover of a German book about the Reichstag fire, written by a Nazi and published shortly after the fire. The image on the front of the book is of Van der Lubbe standing next to a fire with two men wearing cloth caps and scarves with guns standing nearby protecting him.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    In conclusion, I don't think that sources F and H completely prove that Goering was telling lies as they are too unreliable to be used to say that he was. Even though I think that Goering was telling lies, there is not enough proof from the sources so I cannot justify that.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    In fact, Source E and F are like 'competitors'. Source E states Goering was the mastermind whereas Source F states that Halder's evidence was not true. When we have two sources that disagree with each other, it means that we couldn't trust both sources.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    It supports C further by saying that 'the police supplied men with axes, housebreaking tools and ladders', similar to where C says; 'they had been provided with hammers, axes and fire bombs'. Source E is reasonably reliable, and so can be regarded as a useful source.

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    It is also trying to get a point over to the British public that Germany needs help, by promoting itself in a British magazine. Similarities between the two sources are that violence is common among the Nazis and that the events of 'Kristallnacht' are their doings.

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Because of the nature of this book, it is difficult to interpret any other details that would support statement A. One difference between the source and the first statement however; is that the book cover shows Communists helping Van der Lubbe, whereas for this to be fully supportive, only Van

  1. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    Although the entire German population was not in agreement with Hitler's persecution of the Jews, there is no evidence of any large scale protest regarding their treatment. There were Germans who defied the April 1st, 1933 boycott and purposely bought in Jewish stores, and there were those who aided Jews

  2. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    The cover of the book explained his opinion and persuaded the Germans that the communists were to be accused: Van der Lubbe appears lightning matches over the building. They used the book to guide people whether to choose the Nazi party or other parties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work