• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Use this source and your own knowledge to explain how useful this account of the events of 27th February is. Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 2 Use this source and your own knowledge to explain how useful this account of the events of 27th February is. Explain your answer. Source C is an extract from a book called 'My part in Germanys Flight' published in Germany in 1935. Josef Goebbels, the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, wrote the book. As Minister of Propaganda, it was Josef Goebbels job to gain support for the Nazi party. He is not going to portray the Nazis in a negative way. Anything he says is likely to make the Nazis seem like a decent party and possibly make the communists (the Nazis main opposition) ...read more.

Middle

If the fire had happened today in the year 2003, firefighters would not have been able to establish the cause of the fire so quickly, let alone in 1933. According to Goebbels, there was "no doubt" that the Communists were responsible for starting the fire and had done it in order to create "an atmosphere of panic and terror". This is only one mans opinion and that man is a leading Nazi. This is a Nazis version of events. Obviously the Nazis are going to accuse the Communists of starting the fire so they can get rid of them as they pose a strong threat to the Nazis. ...read more.

Conclusion

confessed that he "set fire to [the Reichstag]". However all these sources have reliability problems. Source C is not particularly useful for studying the events of 27th February because it can be shown to be unreliable. The Source is full of Goebbels' opinions, also, as Goebbels was Minister of Propaganda it is probably filled with lies and half-truths. Goebbels published this book two years after the Reichstag fire. At this period of time (1935) the Nazis had not been in power for long and perhaps they were facing threats from the Communists. This book may have been published in order to twist people's perceptions of the communists and view them in a negative way. Although the source is clearly unreliable, it is useful as an example of Goebbels work as Minister of Propaganda. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    It tells us that Hitler never wanted it to happen. This source supports H by agreeing that Hitler disapproved of 'Kristallnacht', but has nothing it that mentions Goering's theory that Goebbels was behind it all. A factor of unreliability is that it is reported over 30 years later by Frau Troost in an interview.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Therefore this source could be implying that Kristallnacht was in fact 'a spontaneous event of the German people', although it is not completely clear, and it could have been true that although anti- Semitism was building up around this time, the attack may still have been organised by the Nazis'.

  1. From this source and your own knowledge, explainthe reference to 'Fhrer power'

    This source is useful for investigating the nature of his appeal as well because it shows his followers being very loyal almost as if he was an Emperor, 'Yes! Leader we are following you!' so it shows that the nature of the appeal is that Hitler wants absolute loyalty and faith from his followers.

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    This information would have to be gained from another source in order to fully support the statement, as it is not clear from this particular source. Because Van der Lubbe was in actual fact most likely suffering from some sort of mental disorder, his statement is therefore very unreliable and

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    still saw the Communists as a threat; or 'Danger to the Communists', meaning the artist was against the Nazis, and thought that the Nazis were a threat to Communism, even if they were not an actual threat to the artist himself.

  2. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    Members of the Evangelical Church formed a splinter institution - Confessing Church - that openly opposed Nazi racism and brutality. Students and teachers at the University of Munich formed an underground resistance movement ("The White Rose") but were eventually apprehended and executed in April 1943.

  1. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    This is linked to how in 1936, when the book was published, Britain had freedom of speech so Delmer would most likely be telling the truth therefore making this Source more reliable. However, Source D could also be unreliable. In 1936, many people in Britain thought Hitler and the Nazi

  2. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    In conclusion, the evidence shows that source A can't be seen as a reliable source: it was written a lot of years after the event actually happened and is totally one-sided view favoring the Nazis. Source A shows the one-sided view that the Communists where the ones that set on the Reichstag fire.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work