• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Use this source and your own knowledge to explain how useful this account of the events of 27th February is. Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


Question 2 Use this source and your own knowledge to explain how useful this account of the events of 27th February is. Explain your answer. Source C is an extract from a book called 'My part in Germanys Flight' published in Germany in 1935. Josef Goebbels, the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, wrote the book. As Minister of Propaganda, it was Josef Goebbels job to gain support for the Nazi party. He is not going to portray the Nazis in a negative way. Anything he says is likely to make the Nazis seem like a decent party and possibly make the communists (the Nazis main opposition) ...read more.


If the fire had happened today in the year 2003, firefighters would not have been able to establish the cause of the fire so quickly, let alone in 1933. According to Goebbels, there was "no doubt" that the Communists were responsible for starting the fire and had done it in order to create "an atmosphere of panic and terror". This is only one mans opinion and that man is a leading Nazi. This is a Nazis version of events. Obviously the Nazis are going to accuse the Communists of starting the fire so they can get rid of them as they pose a strong threat to the Nazis. ...read more.


confessed that he "set fire to [the Reichstag]". However all these sources have reliability problems. Source C is not particularly useful for studying the events of 27th February because it can be shown to be unreliable. The Source is full of Goebbels' opinions, also, as Goebbels was Minister of Propaganda it is probably filled with lies and half-truths. Goebbels published this book two years after the Reichstag fire. At this period of time (1935) the Nazis had not been in power for long and perhaps they were facing threats from the Communists. This book may have been published in order to twist people's perceptions of the communists and view them in a negative way. Although the source is clearly unreliable, it is useful as an example of Goebbels work as Minister of Propaganda. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    However, it does support Source I. The damage in the picture was severe and it showed that van der Lubbe would not have been able to do the severe damage in a short time. Overall, two of the sources are unreliable and one is reliable.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    And though F and H are backed up by each other and E, the unreliability outweighs what could be used as proof so therefore, the answer to the question is no, they do not prove that. Using all the sources, I will be trying to explain which of these interpretations

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Source E does not actually prove much about the actual circumstances of the planning of the fire; it only suggests that G�ring was the one who initiated the fire in the Reichstag Parliament building. This statement by General Franz Halder does not suggest or even mention whether the Nazis used

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    It depicts Tsar Nicholas II 'who had encouraged attacks against Jews during his reign (1894-1917), who is looking down from what I assume is heaven. Communists murdered him and his family in 1918. Nicholas is saying to the Nazi who stands below him, 'Attacking the Jews did not do me any good, my Fascist friend'.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    The title of the cartoon, I think, is also important. 'The Red Peril' could be taken to mean different things: 'Red' means Communist, and 'Peril' obviously means danger. But is this title saying 'Danger of the Communists', which would mean the artist was either for the Nazis or neutral, but

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    Jews after killing them or that time is running out for them in their regime of hatred towards Jews. It proves that the Nazi's had no heart and are very greedy. Overall, I think that this source clearly blames the Nazis for 'Kristallnacht' and not the German people.

  1. The two sources are extracts that address the issue of the Reichstag Fire that ...

    This suspended civil liberties, and gave the power for the Nazis to arrest people indefinitely, arrest all Communist leaders and enable them to beat them up in the street, which effectively became the fundamental law when the Nazi regime actually ascended to power absolutely.

  2. From this source and your own knowledge, explainthe reference to 'Fhrer power'

    This source is useful for investigating the nature of his appeal as well because it shows his followers being very loyal almost as if he was an Emperor, 'Yes! Leader we are following you!' so it shows that the nature of the appeal is that Hitler wants absolute loyalty and faith from his followers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work