• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using The Sources And Your Own Knowledge Describe How Stalin Improved The Soviet Economy During The 5 Year Plans.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using The Sources And Your Own Knowledge Describe How Stalin Improved The Soviet Economy During The 5 Year Plans. Through out history many famous people have lived. One of the most famous dictators that have lived was Josef Stalin. Josef Stalin was born in 1879 in the Russian province of Georgia. His original name was Djugashuilli. Stalin became a leading communist after he helped defend the Bolshevik city of Tsaritsyn during the civil war and by 1929 he was the undisputed leader of the Communist Party and the dictator of Russia. Some sources show very clearly how poor production in Russia was before the first 5-year plan. For example Source A shows us the electricity production in 1927-28 was 5.05(thousand million kilowatt hours). Coal production was at the slow rate of 35.4(million tons). Oil production was just 11.7(million tons). Pig Iron was only 3.7(million tons) and Steel was at the low rate of 4.0(million tons). Also source B shows us that in 1929 Russia was far behind the U.S.A., Germany and the U.K. in the world of manufacturing output. They had at least 5% share of the output. When the first 5-year plan was passed the soviet economy was vastly improved. ...read more.

Middle

Also in source F the Dean of Canterbury was visiting Moscow in 1939 he said, "There is no fear of wage reduction in a land were none are unemployed." The sources that suggest that Stalin's five-year plans were not a success are; Source D that suggests "The Tsars had developed a considerable industrial capacity" so in a sence all the hard work had been done before Stalin came into power so he should have no credit in helping Russia. Also sources G & I say that in order for Stalin to make Russia into a industrial power human sacrifices were necessary in order to achieve this, source G states "If a few million people had to perish in the process, history would forgive Comrade Stalin." Also by looking at source I the poster is accusing Stalin of building huge buildings at great human costs however looking back at that period in time there were was almost a certainty of death when building something as big as a Dam. DO SOURCES H AND I PROVIDE ANY USEFUL INFORMATION ABOUT STALIN Sources H and I provide information about Stalin, some of which maybe true but also misleading. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also I believe that Stalin should not have used his power to achive his own personal vendetta against his enemies. As vast amounts of people were needed to work in the remote inhospitable regions of the USSR where hardily anyone lived, in order to fulfil the demands for industrialisation. The prisoners built railways, roads and canals. In order to achieve his economic goals, Stalin was prepared to make sacrifices but not his own. He arrested thousands of people who questioned his methods and labelled them "wreckers" and accused them of endeavouring to stop the revolution. There were rewards for those who worked hard. However what made Stalin seem like a bloodthirsty tyrant was that not even the Red Army and the secret police (NKVD) were safe from these purges. Over 3,000 NKVD agents were killed and over 35,000 Army offices were shot or imprisoned. A purge on this scale sent shockwaves thought the whole Soviet Union. Between 1936 and 1953 the year Stalin died over 40,000,000 people were arrested as enemies of the state. About 25,000,000 of these people were executed or died because of overwork. The public were not aware of these deaths until 1988 when President Mikhail Gorbachev confirmed that nearly 20 million citizens had died as a direct result of these purges. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    He used propaganda once again to preach the public that industrialisation was patriotic, this encouraged workers to work for their motherland and to help their motherland to come up through the ranks and be part of the industrialisation process. Stalin removed Trotsky, the Left party the Right Party were in

  2. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    The five-year plans really did make Russia a much stronger country. Not only did the five-year plans allow its economy to raise and allow the people of Russia to have their own money, but it showed the public what they could do if they were put in the right direction and put all their heart into it.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    In addition, how could one forget the reminiscences of the aid the countries of France, Britain, Japan and the US provided to the Whites during the 1918 - 1921 Russian Civil War as well as the speculation which the Soviet Union brought about that the USSR was under threat of

  2. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    Khrushchev states: 'Stalin's brand of collectivisation brought nothing but brutality and misery'. This source is a quote from Khrushchev after Stalin's death. This is a source of good utility and reliability as it is said by Khrushchev after Stalin's death when he was in power so he could say what

  1. How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

    This was having a devastating effect in foreign trade: in 1926-27 exports were at thirty three per cent and imports at thirty eight per cent of their 1913 levels due to the decline in grain exports.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    It is hard to trust Khrushchev's assertions of Stalin because both sources give different views of Stalin. Khrushchev was also trying to win over the Russian population so he may not have meant what he was saying, he could have just said what he said to win over the support of the party.

  1. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    were enlisted to track them down. The 'wrecking scare' of 1928 involved the expert engineers of the Shakhty area of Donbass. Stalin claimed that they had wrecked machinery to slow the improvement of industrially output. This was an attempt to deflect from the failure of the regime.

  2. Stalins Five Year Plans were a great success 1928-1941. Do you agree? Explain you ...

    state needed a group on which they could blame the inefficiency on; and that group was the workers. Some of the products produced were unusable as they had to be turned out so quickly and the machines were unwittingly wrecked by unskilled workers, many of whom were ex-peasants who had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work