• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using The Sources And Your Own Knowledge Describe How Stalin Improved The Soviet Economy During The 5 Year Plans.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using The Sources And Your Own Knowledge Describe How Stalin Improved The Soviet Economy During The 5 Year Plans. Through out history many famous people have lived. One of the most famous dictators that have lived was Josef Stalin. Josef Stalin was born in 1879 in the Russian province of Georgia. His original name was Djugashuilli. Stalin became a leading communist after he helped defend the Bolshevik city of Tsaritsyn during the civil war and by 1929 he was the undisputed leader of the Communist Party and the dictator of Russia. Some sources show very clearly how poor production in Russia was before the first 5-year plan. For example Source A shows us the electricity production in 1927-28 was 5.05(thousand million kilowatt hours). Coal production was at the slow rate of 35.4(million tons). Oil production was just 11.7(million tons). Pig Iron was only 3.7(million tons) and Steel was at the low rate of 4.0(million tons). Also source B shows us that in 1929 Russia was far behind the U.S.A., Germany and the U.K. in the world of manufacturing output. They had at least 5% share of the output. When the first 5-year plan was passed the soviet economy was vastly improved. ...read more.

Middle

Also in source F the Dean of Canterbury was visiting Moscow in 1939 he said, "There is no fear of wage reduction in a land were none are unemployed." The sources that suggest that Stalin's five-year plans were not a success are; Source D that suggests "The Tsars had developed a considerable industrial capacity" so in a sence all the hard work had been done before Stalin came into power so he should have no credit in helping Russia. Also sources G & I say that in order for Stalin to make Russia into a industrial power human sacrifices were necessary in order to achieve this, source G states "If a few million people had to perish in the process, history would forgive Comrade Stalin." Also by looking at source I the poster is accusing Stalin of building huge buildings at great human costs however looking back at that period in time there were was almost a certainty of death when building something as big as a Dam. DO SOURCES H AND I PROVIDE ANY USEFUL INFORMATION ABOUT STALIN Sources H and I provide information about Stalin, some of which maybe true but also misleading. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also I believe that Stalin should not have used his power to achive his own personal vendetta against his enemies. As vast amounts of people were needed to work in the remote inhospitable regions of the USSR where hardily anyone lived, in order to fulfil the demands for industrialisation. The prisoners built railways, roads and canals. In order to achieve his economic goals, Stalin was prepared to make sacrifices but not his own. He arrested thousands of people who questioned his methods and labelled them "wreckers" and accused them of endeavouring to stop the revolution. There were rewards for those who worked hard. However what made Stalin seem like a bloodthirsty tyrant was that not even the Red Army and the secret police (NKVD) were safe from these purges. Over 3,000 NKVD agents were killed and over 35,000 Army offices were shot or imprisoned. A purge on this scale sent shockwaves thought the whole Soviet Union. Between 1936 and 1953 the year Stalin died over 40,000,000 people were arrested as enemies of the state. About 25,000,000 of these people were executed or died because of overwork. The public were not aware of these deaths until 1988 when President Mikhail Gorbachev confirmed that nearly 20 million citizens had died as a direct result of these purges. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    In practice this wasn't the case. In a bid to increase collective membership, peasants were granted incentives to join the collectives in 1930. Stalin introduced the machine tractor station in Russia, where collectives could borrow machinery and increase their productivity in return for payment in the form of crops.

  2. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    The five-year plans really did make Russia a much stronger country. Not only did the five-year plans allow its economy to raise and allow the people of Russia to have their own money, but it showed the public what they could do if they were put in the right direction and put all their heart into it.

  1. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    Stalin also wanted to catch up with the West in the standard of living conditions of the USSR people. Industrialisation created wealth for a society where people would have a good life and people in other parts of the world would welcome the working conditions.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Above all, the fiscal and political issues which encouraged Stalin to intensify industrialisation were correlated with the idea of the fear of foreign invasion and war scare which were two of the most speculated topics of discussion amongst the Russian public in the 1920s.

  1. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    There are different impossible interpretations of this source in issuing this statement Stalin could suggesting that collectivisation is going well. Or possibly he could be suggesting people calm down because the situation may be chaotic. Stalin's right hand man Khrushchev backs the argument of collectivisation as a failure.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This speech was made to the Communist party which he needed the support of. Khrushchev is being polite in the way he talks about Stalin in this source, baring in mind this speech was being said to the communist party, who Stalin worked with.

  1. How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

    * A massive injection of capital investment was now needed to move the industrialisation process forward, to make matters worse; the economy was facing serious difficulties at the end of the 1920s.

  2. Stalins Five Year Plans were a great success 1928-1941. Do you agree? Explain you ...

    state needed a group on which they could blame the inefficiency on; and that group was the workers. Some of the products produced were unusable as they had to be turned out so quickly and the machines were unwittingly wrecked by unskilled workers, many of whom were ex-peasants who had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work