• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the sources and your own knowledge, explain if you feel Haig deserved the reputation of the 'butcher of the Somme.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using the sources and your own knowledge, explain if you feel Haig deserved the reputation of the 'butcher of the Somme In the run up to the war, Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig was appointed the Director of Military Training. In an effort to create a reserve standard army which could double up as a 'home front' defence force, plus a fighting unit for use abroad, he managed to achieve this by pushing for legislation that lead to the creation of the TA (Territory Army) and the BEF (British Expeditionary Force) which were to be later used in the war effort in the 'war to end all wars'. Haig is most famously renowned for his involvement in the "hundreds of dead" soldiers "strung out like wreckage" in the thickened barbed wire of the failed attack of the Somme, after a relentless artillery barrage on a fifteen mile stretch of front to the West. Continuing on from this, he has so forth earned the sceptically based nickname "the butcher of the Somme" as he sent so many brave, 'lions' to their death never to see "Blighty" again. ...read more.

Middle

His apparent lack of emotion leads me to how he may deserve the label of being "the butcher of the Somme". This reveals when he says "the nation must be taught to bear losses." This heartless attitude bears resemblance to the rule of Bloody Mary as Queen of England when she persecuted Protestants in an attempt to bring England back to the Roman Catholic faith. He is also inferred to be a butcher as he did not stop the men from going over the top when he saw that his particular plan of action was not working in its current state Even though the Somme was a terrible disaster, it served in a positive light to be a learning curve for the British Battalions/Sections/Corps/and generals. With the benefit of hindsight, it showed the Allies that their was a serious, inadmissible problem in their ranks because how such a mass scale massacre of men could happen after such a well planned offensive from high up the ranks to Haig himself is a clerical atrocity. ...read more.

Conclusion

Then as a direct result of the defeat at the Somme, the troops became "combat hardened" and a basic "amateur army had learnt its trade" in the most brutal circumstances. This serves to prove my belief that Haig doesn't deserve being called "the Butcher of the Somme". In conclusion, I say that I have proved beyond doubt and assumption that Haig doesn't deserve being labelled "the Butcher of the Somme". This is because even though he was in charge, and so forth at the forefront of the British "Dig for Victory" war effort, he was not at complete fault. 19,240 soldiers died on the first day and in subsequent days the death toll rose to 150,000 men in the Somme which Field Marshall Sir Douglas Haig is usually remembered for, however I believe he has just been searched out as a person to blame; a scapegoat for the whole situation of the horrific loss of life in the foreign fields of the Somme. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    So much so, that he realises that the treaty of Versailles is actually 'merely laying up troubles for the future'. This refutes Foreman. Who claims war for the generals is a 'game of soldiers', and feel that the follow-on from the war is nothing to do with them.

  2. Haig, Butcher of the Somme

    There were heavy losses, but Haig warned of this beforehand and the government did not object. When it became clear that little progress was being made David Lloyd George did not remove Haig from his position. This suggests British high command was satisfied with his tactics and the results.

  1. Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme?

    Rawlinson put up a good argument for this and was well researched. Besides, he and Laffargue were convinced it would work. Awareness Because of his distance from it, Haig really had no idea (and probably didn't care) what the situation was on the front line.

  2. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    Other left wing socialists have reached similar conclusions through research. A.J.P.Taylor, along with the rest of Britain, never expected such an intense war. The past wars had been so easy, they felt their 'idealisms [got] perished on the Somme.' Taylor speaks of admiration in this history book in 1963, thinking soldiers were 'brave' and in their defence they were 'helpless'.

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    Source H, refers to Haig as 'one of the main architects of the allied victory' which connects to source G claim that the 'Somme had no great importance in the strategic sense; its consequences nevertheless were great, particularly as regards to moral.

  2. Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme

    Although Wilson says this, there was no indication shown by Haig that he helped out the troops, visited any one of them, but lots of evidence to suggest he didn't carefully plan his actions through. Wilson then goes on to say, "...his troops had nothing but respect for the man they knew as Dougie."

  1. Does General Haig deserve to be remembered as the Butcher of the Somme?

    He also mentions that the men are in' splendid spirits' so his opinion of the troop morale is still high. In addition to this source could also be considered as a non- valid interpretation because this is only one view and he only talks about the first day.

  2. history somme

    But in 1930 Lloyd George could have looked over the whole war and seen that just because that day might have been good the campaign on a whole was a disaster. So the two sources differ because of Lloyd George's position and occupation he was in at the time which varied the way he felt about Haig and the Somme.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work