• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the sources in this paper and your knowledge of Stalin explain whether or not you think he was a monster.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using the sources in this paper and your knowledge of Stalin explain whether or not you think he was a monster. (15) Since Stalin was appointed in 1927 he made a lot of changes to the face of the USSR. After the Tsar in 1917 Russia was undeveloped and behind the west in its economy, agriculture and standard of living, Lenin had made a futile attempt at changing this but little had been achieved. Stalin enforced new policies to change and improve the USSR. Stalin made great changes in the Russian economy, he introduced Five year plans to do this. His main reasons for wanting change in the economy was so that the USSR relied less on the west and to produce arms to defend the USSR. The first 5 year plan was to improve heavy industry (coal, steel oil, power), the second was to improve heavy industry, rail and chemicals and the third was to improve luxury goods but was interrupted by WW2 and factories used to make arms. Stalin had modernised Russia through his five year plans, this is backed up by source B, the sources shows the results of this modernised Russia a new hydroelectric power station and it shows how the Soviets wanted you to see Stalin as somebody who jokes with workers. ...read more.

Middle

He used a lot of propaganda and censorship to achieve this but mainly he used fear. The public was afraid to speak out against Stalin because they would be sent to labour camps, many of the people didn't know what was actually going on and therefore continued to support him (they only saw one side). Source F tells us how he had too much power and this caused him to become such a monstrous tyrant, with all the power he had he could get away with murder (absolute power, corrupts absolute). Source H tells us how he used this power, one way of this was to put people on trial that he suspected of crimes but have him as the "judge, jury and executioner" so the suspects had no chance of winning there case. Source C tells us of a writer who has been totally taken in by Stalin's propaganda, he can be described as being a typical civilian of Russia in the way he views Stalin, it is almost worship. Source A show the USSR's pyramids of skulls, these represent the dead from the purges (labour camps, show trials, mass arrests) ...read more.

Conclusion

The peasants resisted burnt crops, animals and started riots (this made Stalin ease off a bit), food shortages got worse and food was even sold to other countries and slowly the peasants accepted collectivisation and the state collective farms were up an running by the mid 1930s. Stalin was not a monster, he was just a ruthless politician with too much power and he couldn't control this power a lot of the time. This is shown in how the purges had to be stopped because they were getting out of control and how the peasants rebelling made him cool off his policy of collectivisation for a while because the situation was becoming worse not better. Also Stalin was a very ambitious politician who didn't quite realise the human costs of his policies. Stalin didn't realise that people would die because of the massive targets he set in his 5 year plans he just wanted to improve Russian the best he could economically. Also when trying to introduce collectivisation Stalin didn't realise that the peasants would rebel and would have to be killed to put down the revolt. Stalin was a man with too much power and a man who didn't realise the consequences of his power and policies, he was not a monster. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    They were treated more like slaves than workers. Anything that went wrong was blamed on the workers. The Shakhty trial was an accusation of fifty-three workers who supposedly conspired to wreck the soviet coal-mining industry. In fact, the coal mines in the Donbass region had fallen behind target but the system could not be seen as a failure so workers were blamed.

  2. Stalin Coursework - sources explaining collectivisation and its effects.

    Stalin lusted after being portrayed in a God-like manner, any flaws in his policies would undermine this image and therefore, any failings of Stalin were immediately dismissed and normally blamed on someone else (e.g. in this case, the kulaks). Khrushchev himself said in the 'secret' speech to the Communist Party in 1956 how Stalin demanded "absolute submission to his opinion."

  1. Stalin man or monster

    dates before 1930's where public opinion of Stalin was better then the 1930's, therefore it wouldn't be reliable to use that source. The second similarity is that the credibility of all three sources can be disputed as they are produced in different countries Source A being in France, which was

  2. Stalin : Man or monster

    he felt and his speech was not published under the influence of the government. 4.Do you trust Khrushchev's assessments of Stalin? "He considered this should be done in the interest of the party and of the working masses" Source H suggests that Khrushchev is defending the actions that Stalin took during dictatorship.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This speech was made to the Communist party which he needed the support of. Khrushchev is being polite in the way he talks about Stalin in this source, baring in mind this speech was being said to the communist party, who Stalin worked with.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source A on the other hand is a caricature, Stalin didn't actually stand in front of a pyramid and point at million of dead Russian's skulls. This can imply that source B is much more reliable then source A as only the concept of source A really happened, but not that actual picture.

  1. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    The txt starts with this good point, but from then on the authors point of view changes into a more negative view about Stalin. Therefore, the text is balanced, giving both sides of the story. After the point about Stalin giving the USSR the strength to beat Germany, the author talks of the bad policies Stalin made, such as collectivisation.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    The first thing I noticed about this cartoon is the clothes the workers are wearing and the clothes Stalin is wearing. Stalin wearing white seems to stick out in the picture possibly showing his importance, almost liken an Angel. The fact that he is standing beside this new power station

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work