• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the sources in this paper and your knowledge of Stalin explain whether or not you think he was a monster.

Extracts from this document...


Using the sources in this paper and your knowledge of Stalin explain whether or not you think he was a monster. (15) Since Stalin was appointed in 1927 he made a lot of changes to the face of the USSR. After the Tsar in 1917 Russia was undeveloped and behind the west in its economy, agriculture and standard of living, Lenin had made a futile attempt at changing this but little had been achieved. Stalin enforced new policies to change and improve the USSR. Stalin made great changes in the Russian economy, he introduced Five year plans to do this. His main reasons for wanting change in the economy was so that the USSR relied less on the west and to produce arms to defend the USSR. The first 5 year plan was to improve heavy industry (coal, steel oil, power), the second was to improve heavy industry, rail and chemicals and the third was to improve luxury goods but was interrupted by WW2 and factories used to make arms. Stalin had modernised Russia through his five year plans, this is backed up by source B, the sources shows the results of this modernised Russia a new hydroelectric power station and it shows how the Soviets wanted you to see Stalin as somebody who jokes with workers. ...read more.


He used a lot of propaganda and censorship to achieve this but mainly he used fear. The public was afraid to speak out against Stalin because they would be sent to labour camps, many of the people didn't know what was actually going on and therefore continued to support him (they only saw one side). Source F tells us how he had too much power and this caused him to become such a monstrous tyrant, with all the power he had he could get away with murder (absolute power, corrupts absolute). Source H tells us how he used this power, one way of this was to put people on trial that he suspected of crimes but have him as the "judge, jury and executioner" so the suspects had no chance of winning there case. Source C tells us of a writer who has been totally taken in by Stalin's propaganda, he can be described as being a typical civilian of Russia in the way he views Stalin, it is almost worship. Source A show the USSR's pyramids of skulls, these represent the dead from the purges (labour camps, show trials, mass arrests) ...read more.


The peasants resisted burnt crops, animals and started riots (this made Stalin ease off a bit), food shortages got worse and food was even sold to other countries and slowly the peasants accepted collectivisation and the state collective farms were up an running by the mid 1930s. Stalin was not a monster, he was just a ruthless politician with too much power and he couldn't control this power a lot of the time. This is shown in how the purges had to be stopped because they were getting out of control and how the peasants rebelling made him cool off his policy of collectivisation for a while because the situation was becoming worse not better. Also Stalin was a very ambitious politician who didn't quite realise the human costs of his policies. Stalin didn't realise that people would die because of the massive targets he set in his 5 year plans he just wanted to improve Russian the best he could economically. Also when trying to introduce collectivisation Stalin didn't realise that the peasants would rebel and would have to be killed to put down the revolt. Stalin was a man with too much power and a man who didn't realise the consequences of his power and policies, he was not a monster. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    However, the real horror never took place until 1934 when Purges began to take place when Kirov, the leader of the Leningrad Communist Party was assassinated. Stalin cleverly used his intelligence to clear out all his opponents because of the murder.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    The main message of this source is to show that Stalin already set the outcome of the show trials and there was nothing anyone could do about it. Source J is of a cartoon published in France in the late 1930s. The cartoon shows what happens in the show trial.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    The two sources are different in a sort that in source C Stalin shows his modest and in source A he is very proud of himself. Conversely, they both show that he is dealing with the Russian people. Another major difference is that source A is said to have been

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    throughout her history due to her disorganisation and backwardness as he mentioned in a speech in 1931, "we are 50 to 100 years behind the advanced countries. Either we make good the difference in ten years or they crush us".

  1. Stalin man or monster

    The source also portrays that Stalin felt good about it, as it meant nothing except of it being a tourist attraction with Stalin presenting his proud doings. Source B is a painting of Stalin in the nineteen thirties, this painting is sending across Stalin's policies of propaganda, the five year plans and industrialisation.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    force that no nation could ignore - or would ignore at its peril. Internally, the events in Tiananmen Square had repercussions as various factions within the government sought to apportion blame, and thus gain political power. However, despite a period of slight instability, Deng retained his overall control, and his

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    Both sources reveal that in a small amount of time attitudes and opinions towards Stalin differed greatly. One possible reason behind this is that Stalin disowned a long-time friend and not because he began to carry out murders and purges.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    It contrasts sharply to the lies of the bourgeois historians who have attempted to smear the democratic ideas of Leninism with the crimes of Stalinism. This "dictatorship of the proletariat" was in every sense a genuine workers' democracy, unlike the later totalitarian regime of Stalin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work