• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the sources provided and your own knowledge of Haig, explain whether you think he was a good or bad commander.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

5. Using the sources provided and your own knowledge of Haig, explain whether you think he was a good or bad commander. General Haig was the commander of the British forces for the Battle of the Somme. Many people blame Haig for how the victory came about; many people have called him ' the butcher of the Somme'. Thousands of men gave their lives in this battle (20 000 British soldiers died) yet only a small amount of land was gained. Some people, therefore, believe that Haig was a very cruel and cold-blooded man who should have never have sent his men over the top. However some people think that this had to happen in order to have a chance of winning the war. So there is a great difference in opinions to whether Haig was a good commander or a bad one. Haig was 54 years old when he was the commander of the Somme and so he would have been experience but he would also have been old-fashioned. ...read more.

Middle

the destruction of deep dugouts' and that it was successful because 'on some sectors, the Germans evacuated the whole front line trench.' Haig lived 40 km away from the trench so it would have been not possible for him to know this and so he wouldn't know what to do. He wouldn't have cared when he sent his men over the top because he never visited the trenches to experience what they experienced. On the first day thousands of soldiers lost their lives in the battle but he carried on still without reaching a breakthrough in the next 142 days. Other people will disagree with this as they think he was a 'hero' and the result of the battle was a victory. They say that there were little other alternatives. Source A portrays Haig's army as 'patriotic heroes' and this is the message that is received back home, although it isn't reliable as nothing clear is known. Source B (i) backs Haig's importance for the battle of the Somme and says how necessary it was to take action and why he needed to. ...read more.

Conclusion

He also believed that God would lead his army to victory and so it was the vital sacrifice. He had criticisms for continuing with the attack even though so many lives were being lost, however he had a lot of pressure from the public and the politicians. There was also a communication problem, Haig was under the impression that they were winning the war, as Charters gave him positive information to make him feel better and have less pressure. He was never at the front line, so he would not know what was happening. It could be said that the Somme was actually something that they could learn from to help them win the war, and that it had turned the army in to excellent, experienced soldiers. We could say that it was easy for him to have changed his methods and views, but it must have been hard to use the methods that had never been used. Though judging what Haig did, a huge amount of men were killed, and many families must have been affected, so I don't think that it was right what Haig did to sacrifice people because of his religious beliefs and idealistic ideas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Source 10 I feel is more reliable that source 9 as evidence as it attempts to empathise, but it is less reliable than source 8 because it is constricted to a rhyming pattern, so the writer can obscure the facts through poet's licence.

  2. Using the sources and your own knowledge, explain if you feel Haig deserved the ...

    The "war of attrition" was for the winning so Haig's over confidence "the men are in splendid spirits" reveals that he seemed to not care about the fate of the 19,240 soldiers who were to die in whole battalions the next day as they were isolated in their 2m by

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    These pictures in the source are primary evidence and are photographic, which makes them very reliable in comparison to writing, since a photograph cannot lie. However in some respects, it does lie. There are only 2 photos, and is a very narrow view of one day.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    it was Haig who suggested to the King that French was "a source of great weakness to the army, and no-one had any confidence in him anymore." He then suggested that he himself was ready to do the duty in any capacity, obviously meaning as commander in chief.

  1. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    I also have knowledge from the videos and books that not all the generals followed Haig's instructions. For example General Elliot refused to attack in poor weather conditions In source D an extract from the diary of an important New Zealand Officer whose men fought in the battle, criticism is strong towards Haig.

  2. Study carefully all the sources. 'Without the work of women on the Home Front, ...

    Suffragettes wanted the right to vote and used fierce campaigns often ending in violence and riots. They were strong, determined and single-minded women. Sylvia was especially this way. She set up unions to campaign for women's rights. The source, therefore, could be biased and used to persuade people to support and join them.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    "There was a danger of trench feet, and the men had to rub a sort of fat or whale oil on their feet to prevent it. Lots of the blighters [soldiers] avoided doing that because they knew if they got trench feet they would be sent back down the line" Sergeant J.

  2. Haig: Butcher or Serious Commander?

    This is not to say that Coppard is in any way deceiving the reader, indeed it could be almost taken for granted that his account is completely true. Middlebrook's account is supported by Coppard, but only insofar as that the bombardment in the week preceding was insufficient.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work