• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the sources provided and your own knowledge of Haig, explain whether you think he was a good or bad commander.

Extracts from this document...


5. Using the sources provided and your own knowledge of Haig, explain whether you think he was a good or bad commander. General Haig was the commander of the British forces for the Battle of the Somme. Many people blame Haig for how the victory came about; many people have called him ' the butcher of the Somme'. Thousands of men gave their lives in this battle (20 000 British soldiers died) yet only a small amount of land was gained. Some people, therefore, believe that Haig was a very cruel and cold-blooded man who should have never have sent his men over the top. However some people think that this had to happen in order to have a chance of winning the war. So there is a great difference in opinions to whether Haig was a good commander or a bad one. Haig was 54 years old when he was the commander of the Somme and so he would have been experience but he would also have been old-fashioned. ...read more.


the destruction of deep dugouts' and that it was successful because 'on some sectors, the Germans evacuated the whole front line trench.' Haig lived 40 km away from the trench so it would have been not possible for him to know this and so he wouldn't know what to do. He wouldn't have cared when he sent his men over the top because he never visited the trenches to experience what they experienced. On the first day thousands of soldiers lost their lives in the battle but he carried on still without reaching a breakthrough in the next 142 days. Other people will disagree with this as they think he was a 'hero' and the result of the battle was a victory. They say that there were little other alternatives. Source A portrays Haig's army as 'patriotic heroes' and this is the message that is received back home, although it isn't reliable as nothing clear is known. Source B (i) backs Haig's importance for the battle of the Somme and says how necessary it was to take action and why he needed to. ...read more.


He also believed that God would lead his army to victory and so it was the vital sacrifice. He had criticisms for continuing with the attack even though so many lives were being lost, however he had a lot of pressure from the public and the politicians. There was also a communication problem, Haig was under the impression that they were winning the war, as Charters gave him positive information to make him feel better and have less pressure. He was never at the front line, so he would not know what was happening. It could be said that the Somme was actually something that they could learn from to help them win the war, and that it had turned the army in to excellent, experienced soldiers. We could say that it was easy for him to have changed his methods and views, but it must have been hard to use the methods that had never been used. Though judging what Haig did, a huge amount of men were killed, and many families must have been affected, so I don't think that it was right what Haig did to sacrifice people because of his religious beliefs and idealistic ideas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Source 10 I feel is more reliable that source 9 as evidence as it attempts to empathise, but it is less reliable than source 8 because it is constricted to a rhyming pattern, so the writer can obscure the facts through poet's licence.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Considering this operation was put together in a couple of days it was extremely effective. The government used all the ships it could get their hands on, pleasure boats were used to help the evacuation. The halt of the German tanks gave Ramsay more time to put the operation together

  1. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    It says, "My opinion is that the generals who direct these battles do not know of the conditions, mud, cold, rain and lack of shelter for the men". The fact that this quote was written by and important officer whose men fought in the battle should ensure that it its reliable.

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    The failure of the artillery bombardment was due to poor supplies. Almost a third of shells fired at the German trenches were ineffective. Many shells failed to explode or did not cause an impact, and the accuracy of the artillery guns was poor.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    On the 5th June 1940, Dunkirk made the front page. The article is still quite nationalistic, but there is no doubt that is portraying an image of defeat. In this source Dunkirk is described as a 'Colossal Military Disaster'. This supports the argument that Dunkirk was a heavy defeat in

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    after this first experiment and for the next year and a half he persisted with the policy of huge bombardments lasting up to two weeks. This was no more apparent than during the infamous Somme Offensive, on which most of Haig's critics base their criticism.

  1. Haig: Butcher or Serious Commander?

    This is not to say that Coppard is in any way deceiving the reader, indeed it could be almost taken for granted that his account is completely true. Middlebrook's account is supported by Coppard, but only insofar as that the bombardment in the week preceding was insufficient.

  2. Study carefully all the sources. 'Without the work of women on the Home Front, ...

    Suffragettes wanted the right to vote and used fierce campaigns often ending in violence and riots. They were strong, determined and single-minded women. Sylvia was especially this way. She set up unions to campaign for women's rights. The source, therefore, could be biased and used to persuade people to support and join them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work