• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree about the role that Lenin played in the foundation and development of communist government in Russia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare Passage A and B on the importance of Lenin in the establishment of Russian communism. In passage A, Lenin is portrayed as the sole savior of the proletariat and the champion of communism established in Russia. The passage corroborates its claim by underlining the change or adaptation Lenin had done to the original Marxist theory. The historian in this passage extols Lenin to have rendered the Marxist ideas as "a proposition that corresponded to the new historical conditions." It posits that if the change implemented by Lenin had not occurred, Marxist ideas would be outdated and unable to be adapted to result in a successful establishment of Russian communism. Lenin's acumen is highly valued by the historian as the Bolshevik leader who had "the courage to replace one of the old propositions of Marxism." Ultimately, Lenin is characterized by the savior of the proletariat from the enemies. On the other hand, passage B does consider that "Lenin had the greatest but no the sole influence" in establishment of Russian communism. It directly refutes the portrayal of Lenin as the father of Russian communism presented in passage A. In fact, Robert Service claims that "Lenin did not invent most of the attitudes of Russian revolutionary." The historian states that Lenin was one of the many groups that advocated similar causes. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin, indeed, never was part of the Soviets. Perhaps Lenin does deserve to be acknowledged as having the "greatest influence" through his leadership and propaganda that antagonized the provisional government and won the support of the people, but other contemporaries such as Trotsky played almost an equal role in capsizing the Provisional Government to give birth to the communist order (Source B). On the other hand, some historians portray Lenin as "the natural leader of the party" but a leader that "had to reaffirm his credentials repeatedly." These historians provide instances where Lenin's views were not accepted by the other members of the Bolshevik parties. In reality many factions existed within the party where "members could cultivate their own constituencies." Other contemporary leaders of the party include Zinoviev, Kamenev, Trotsky, Tomsky and Stalin. A historical evidence that could authenticate that Lenin's views were not always accepted. When Lenin wrote his April Thesis in 1917, the Bolshevik party refused to publish it in its own newspapers as the members thought that these ideas were too radical. They were afraid of the possible backlashes by publishing Lenin's programs. Another historical instance where Lenin's program caused polemic inside his communist party was his issue of New Economic Policy in 1921. Almost all the members of the party rejected this policy as "capitalist." ...read more.

Conclusion

and Lenin. Also, the translation of this document into English could be a problem, depending on the level of accuracy of the translation. On the other hand, Source B, written by Robert Service, a British historian, is a secondary source, published in 1997. Source B is a passage from Critical Companion to the Russian Revolution (ed. Acton, Chernaiev and Rosenberg). The book was written with the purpose to provide and emphasize that a strong revolutionary tradition existed in Russia before Lenin came upon the scene to students. This source is particularly valuable in that it is written by a non-Russian historian, thus, adding objectivity to the interpretations put forth since the historian is not writing his native history. In addition, it has many editors who revised this source, and therefore is more convincing since there are four historians corroborating the document. Also, the source is quite recent compared to Source A which was published in 1938. Nonetheless, this source also has limitations. The fact that the Source B is a secondary source is a weakness. In addition, the source possibly does not give insights to the Russian perspective as much detailed or more as a source that would be written by a Russian historian. Moreover, Source B seems to be anti-Lenin and give little credit to Lenin for his role in establishing Communism in Russia; thus there might be some subjectivity in this document. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    Eventually, after the arrest of the Provisional Government, Lenin appeared at the Second Congress of Soviets and announced the success of the Revolution. Yet it had been down to Trotsky that the coup had been a success. Lenin had not appreciated Trotsky's suggestion of getting the Petrograd Soviet to authorise

  2. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    Furthermore, Kirov was a popular figure within the Party, seen by the popularity of the vote in his favour, which therefore leads me to believe that Stalin was the only person with a sufficient motive for murder. Moreover, the 'snow ball' effects, were that the man caught red-handed for the

  1. History Force essay. A specific individual and group, Lenin and the Bolsheviks ...

    However, Lenin changed some aspects on the idea of Marxism and created his own theory known as "Leninism". Leninism is a political theory of the dictatorship of the proletariat led by a revolutionary vanguard Party, Developed by Lenin. It comprises of political and socialist economic theories developed from Marxism.

  2. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    Whereas, | think that Lenin was more concerned about ensuring absolute internal stability and allowing communism to spread naturally. This I think is a reason that Stalin was more important than Lenin in the creation of the USSR. Economic impact The NEP, implemented because of the famine cause by the

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Have the Chinese people been better off in each of these areas since the death of Mao? Explain your answer. The Cultural Revolution was not officially ended until 1977 but it had passed its worse excesses by 1972, and a balance of power between left wing and right, radicals and moderates was established.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    As late as 1940, two-thirds of the population lived in conditions of rural backwardness. Now, the entire position has been reversed. Two-thirds live in the cities and only one-third on the land, in other words, we have witnessed the same processes that we saw in the West over the last 50 years, i.e.

  1. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    If they grow 10 tons of produce the government only takes 5 tons leaving the peasant to sell 4 tons and left with 1 ton plus cash from their own personal sell unlike a lazy peasant. This would make the peasants work harder and give more back to the state

  2. How significant a figure in the revolution of 1917 Russia was Lenin?

    councils formed by elected workers and peasants which were attractive to the people as a good option for new ways to find new leaders; The discontent of the peasant farmers in the countryside and how they were being treated by the regime and The DUMA setting up an alternative and more attractive government to many.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work