• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree about the role that Lenin played in the foundation and development of communist government in Russia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare Passage A and B on the importance of Lenin in the establishment of Russian communism. In passage A, Lenin is portrayed as the sole savior of the proletariat and the champion of communism established in Russia. The passage corroborates its claim by underlining the change or adaptation Lenin had done to the original Marxist theory. The historian in this passage extols Lenin to have rendered the Marxist ideas as "a proposition that corresponded to the new historical conditions." It posits that if the change implemented by Lenin had not occurred, Marxist ideas would be outdated and unable to be adapted to result in a successful establishment of Russian communism. Lenin's acumen is highly valued by the historian as the Bolshevik leader who had "the courage to replace one of the old propositions of Marxism." Ultimately, Lenin is characterized by the savior of the proletariat from the enemies. On the other hand, passage B does consider that "Lenin had the greatest but no the sole influence" in establishment of Russian communism. It directly refutes the portrayal of Lenin as the father of Russian communism presented in passage A. In fact, Robert Service claims that "Lenin did not invent most of the attitudes of Russian revolutionary." The historian states that Lenin was one of the many groups that advocated similar causes. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin, indeed, never was part of the Soviets. Perhaps Lenin does deserve to be acknowledged as having the "greatest influence" through his leadership and propaganda that antagonized the provisional government and won the support of the people, but other contemporaries such as Trotsky played almost an equal role in capsizing the Provisional Government to give birth to the communist order (Source B). On the other hand, some historians portray Lenin as "the natural leader of the party" but a leader that "had to reaffirm his credentials repeatedly." These historians provide instances where Lenin's views were not accepted by the other members of the Bolshevik parties. In reality many factions existed within the party where "members could cultivate their own constituencies." Other contemporary leaders of the party include Zinoviev, Kamenev, Trotsky, Tomsky and Stalin. A historical evidence that could authenticate that Lenin's views were not always accepted. When Lenin wrote his April Thesis in 1917, the Bolshevik party refused to publish it in its own newspapers as the members thought that these ideas were too radical. They were afraid of the possible backlashes by publishing Lenin's programs. Another historical instance where Lenin's program caused polemic inside his communist party was his issue of New Economic Policy in 1921. Almost all the members of the party rejected this policy as "capitalist." ...read more.

Conclusion

and Lenin. Also, the translation of this document into English could be a problem, depending on the level of accuracy of the translation. On the other hand, Source B, written by Robert Service, a British historian, is a secondary source, published in 1997. Source B is a passage from Critical Companion to the Russian Revolution (ed. Acton, Chernaiev and Rosenberg). The book was written with the purpose to provide and emphasize that a strong revolutionary tradition existed in Russia before Lenin came upon the scene to students. This source is particularly valuable in that it is written by a non-Russian historian, thus, adding objectivity to the interpretations put forth since the historian is not writing his native history. In addition, it has many editors who revised this source, and therefore is more convincing since there are four historians corroborating the document. Also, the source is quite recent compared to Source A which was published in 1938. Nonetheless, this source also has limitations. The fact that the Source B is a secondary source is a weakness. In addition, the source possibly does not give insights to the Russian perspective as much detailed or more as a source that would be written by a Russian historian. Moreover, Source B seems to be anti-Lenin and give little credit to Lenin for his role in establishing Communism in Russia; thus there might be some subjectivity in this document. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    Eventually, after the arrest of the Provisional Government, Lenin appeared at the Second Congress of Soviets and announced the success of the Revolution. Yet it had been down to Trotsky that the coup had been a success. Lenin had not appreciated Trotsky's suggestion of getting the Petrograd Soviet to authorise

  2. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    The development that took place could not have been done by any other method, other than slave labour. Therefore, the purges did provide slave labour which benefited Russia as a country but did not benefit the Russian people. Though, the purges did cause for there being a lot of problems for Russia and the Russian people.

  1. Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people.

    Another change made by Lenin was the increased importance given to women. In the 'Council of People's Commissars' a woman was included as well, Alexandra Kollontai. This strengthening of the women's status had a long-term effect as the following leaders of Russia accorded a greater significance to women - Stalin often used a woman and a man in propaganda posters.

  2. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    Furthermore, Kirov was a popular figure within the Party, seen by the popularity of the vote in his favour, which therefore leads me to believe that Stalin was the only person with a sufficient motive for murder. Moreover, the 'snow ball' effects, were that the man caught red-handed for the

  1. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    The Bolsheviks were beginning to turn peasant views with their violent outrages, as peasants had previously been given land owned by the Tsar, church and nobles this would seem that as a result the peasants would happily oblige to the Bolshevik ways but the following observed by a Businessman in

  2. History Force essay. A specific individual and group, Lenin and the Bolsheviks ...

    It is Lenin's interpretations of Marxist theory within the agrarian Russian Empire of the early 20th century. Lenin reversed Marx's order of economics over politics, allowing for a political revolution led by a vanguard Party of professional revolutionaries rather than a spontaneous uprising of the working class as predicted by Marx.

  1. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    civil war, was a step towards capitalism (a diagram of this is shown as source 'C'). In addition to this the value of factory production more than tripling from 2004 million roubles to 7739 million roubles as shown in 'Reaction and revolutions: Russia 1881-1924 by Michal Lynch'.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Have the Chinese people been better off in each of these areas since the death of Mao? Explain your answer. The Cultural Revolution was not officially ended until 1977 but it had passed its worse excesses by 1972, and a balance of power between left wing and right, radicals and moderates was established.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work