• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree about the role that Lenin played in the foundation and development of communist government in Russia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare Passage A and B on the importance of Lenin in the establishment of Russian communism. In passage A, Lenin is portrayed as the sole savior of the proletariat and the champion of communism established in Russia. The passage corroborates its claim by underlining the change or adaptation Lenin had done to the original Marxist theory. The historian in this passage extols Lenin to have rendered the Marxist ideas as "a proposition that corresponded to the new historical conditions." It posits that if the change implemented by Lenin had not occurred, Marxist ideas would be outdated and unable to be adapted to result in a successful establishment of Russian communism. Lenin's acumen is highly valued by the historian as the Bolshevik leader who had "the courage to replace one of the old propositions of Marxism." Ultimately, Lenin is characterized by the savior of the proletariat from the enemies. On the other hand, passage B does consider that "Lenin had the greatest but no the sole influence" in establishment of Russian communism. It directly refutes the portrayal of Lenin as the father of Russian communism presented in passage A. In fact, Robert Service claims that "Lenin did not invent most of the attitudes of Russian revolutionary." The historian states that Lenin was one of the many groups that advocated similar causes. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin, indeed, never was part of the Soviets. Perhaps Lenin does deserve to be acknowledged as having the "greatest influence" through his leadership and propaganda that antagonized the provisional government and won the support of the people, but other contemporaries such as Trotsky played almost an equal role in capsizing the Provisional Government to give birth to the communist order (Source B). On the other hand, some historians portray Lenin as "the natural leader of the party" but a leader that "had to reaffirm his credentials repeatedly." These historians provide instances where Lenin's views were not accepted by the other members of the Bolshevik parties. In reality many factions existed within the party where "members could cultivate their own constituencies." Other contemporary leaders of the party include Zinoviev, Kamenev, Trotsky, Tomsky and Stalin. A historical evidence that could authenticate that Lenin's views were not always accepted. When Lenin wrote his April Thesis in 1917, the Bolshevik party refused to publish it in its own newspapers as the members thought that these ideas were too radical. They were afraid of the possible backlashes by publishing Lenin's programs. Another historical instance where Lenin's program caused polemic inside his communist party was his issue of New Economic Policy in 1921. Almost all the members of the party rejected this policy as "capitalist." ...read more.

Conclusion

and Lenin. Also, the translation of this document into English could be a problem, depending on the level of accuracy of the translation. On the other hand, Source B, written by Robert Service, a British historian, is a secondary source, published in 1997. Source B is a passage from Critical Companion to the Russian Revolution (ed. Acton, Chernaiev and Rosenberg). The book was written with the purpose to provide and emphasize that a strong revolutionary tradition existed in Russia before Lenin came upon the scene to students. This source is particularly valuable in that it is written by a non-Russian historian, thus, adding objectivity to the interpretations put forth since the historian is not writing his native history. In addition, it has many editors who revised this source, and therefore is more convincing since there are four historians corroborating the document. Also, the source is quite recent compared to Source A which was published in 1938. Nonetheless, this source also has limitations. The fact that the Source B is a secondary source is a weakness. In addition, the source possibly does not give insights to the Russian perspective as much detailed or more as a source that would be written by a Russian historian. Moreover, Source B seems to be anti-Lenin and give little credit to Lenin for his role in establishing Communism in Russia; thus there might be some subjectivity in this document. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    As such we can conclude that this historian thinks that Stalin instigated the Purges and show trials because of his own insecurities rather than because of genuine threats to the party or the Union. Indeed this view point is continued in John Arch-Getty's thought written in 'origins of the Great

  2. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    However there was a fault in Lenin's war communism plan as a hard working peasant and a lazy peasant received exactly the same amount of produce, even though the hard working peasant had to grow 9 tons more. Lenin knew something had to change and introduced the NEP which seemingly

  1. Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people.

    Another change made by Lenin was the increased importance given to women. In the 'Council of People's Commissars' a woman was included as well, Alexandra Kollontai. This strengthening of the women's status had a long-term effect as the following leaders of Russia accorded a greater significance to women - Stalin often used a woman and a man in propaganda posters.

  2. Tsarist Rule in the years 1856-1917 and Communist Rule from the death of Lenin ...

    Both the tsarist and Stalinist governments used the idea of 'mother Russia' when stressing the importance of a war effort. However in the case of the tsars, defeats in the Crimean War, Russo-Japanese War and First World War had an adverse effect on the tsarist government, in which the idea of the 'divine, autocratic monarchy' had been greatly diminished.

  1. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    This in turn, led to there being a huge famine in 1932. This famine led to the death of 11 million people because of starvation. The state of Russia in 1932 was so bad that, as a last resort the people cut up dead corpses for food and killed their own families for food.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    The historian tells us of how the effects were disastrous when Stalin's ego clashed with his power. Stalin used fear and manipulation to make people work for him and support him. Stalin's extreme paranoia determined his character. Stalin had a belief that everyone was plotting against him and denouncing Communism.

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    his methods on how to keep the country in control, after Lenin's death many people had hated his the same also happened to Stalin but the last secretary of the Communist party had admitted: "I can only say that cruelty was the main problem with Lenin."

  2. The Bolsheviks, Lenin & Stalin - source based quiestions

    Also he says: "the lack of concern our leaders show towards the people" but he is a leader that has been involved with the purges. It is useful by telling us how Stalin actually wanted to be seen by the Russians.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work