• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Victor Hugo gives us an epic tale of sacrifice and duty in his novel Ninety Three.

Extracts from this document...


Victor Hugo gives us an epic tale of sacrifice and duty in his novel Ninety Three. He manages to entertain, while at the same time to educate and enlighten. The plot of this novel revolves around three main characters. Lantenac, Gauvain and Cimourdain. These characters are all men of great importance. They are also all intimately related. The struggle between Gauvain and Cimourdain demonstrates Hugo's political agenda. At the time of writing this novel Hugo was trying to demonstrate that a Republic was possible without the terror of the First Republic. He uses the character Gauvain to advocate the possibility of a Republic of Clemency, rather than a Republic of Terror. Gauvain and Cimourdain represent the two possibilities of the French Republic. Cimourdain represents the Republic of Virtue that existed during 1793, while Gauvain represents the Republic of clemency that Hugo is advocating for the Third Republic. ...read more.


He saw the necessity of the Terror, and viewed any other option as treason. This implacability is characteristic of the Men of Terror. Another major difference between Cimourdain's view of the Republic, and Gauvain's is their end goal. Cimourdain wanted a Republic of Virtue, where law would force everyone to be good, and for equality to be the rule. The definitive, that is to say, right and duty, in parallel lines, proportional and progressive taxes, obligatory military service, leveling without deviation, and above all and through all, that straight line, law. The Republic of the Absolute. (Hugo, 372) Cimourdain did not wish to raise people to a better place, he simply wanted to equally divide what pleasure and pain already existed. Gauvain is the epitome of Hugo's new Republic, the Republic of Clemency. He wants to create a better world. Pardoning traitors of the Revolution, he believes, will create more support for the Revolution. ...read more.


I would have no taxes at all. (Hugo, 373) Gauvain's idealism is reflective of Hugo's views. Hugo is advocating a Republic similar to that of 1789, but with loftier goals and tempered by mercy. Gauvain and Cimourdain are the extremes of the French Revolution. One advocating mercy and compassion, the other proposing terror to wipe clean the Republic. In these two characters Hugo is presenting the two Republics. The Republic of Terror vs. the Republic of Clemency. Hugo shows that a Republic without the horror of the original Revolution is possible. Not only is it possible, it is a goal that will lift up man to a level only previously dreamed of. When Gauvain is describing his Republic, one cannot but wish that such a place did truly exist. It is no wonder that Hugo's novels served as an impetus to a revolution, and a republic that for the first time truly embodied the words Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. Knupp 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    people Stalin had put to death then the piles we seeing the picture would be just a small part of it. Stalin had tens of millions people put to death or caused them to die by policies such as the artificial famine.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Though the two sources are similar, they also have great differentiations. Source B shows Stalin dressed in peasants clothing to show that he is as one of them. Source C however shows Stalin dressed in a suit showing his superiority to the women.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    him from the image of aggression and killing normally associated with an army uniform, Setting is very calm sea trees sunny dies gives the impression of a peace loving and gentle man. This contradicts source A, which portrays Stalin as a cruel dictator.

  2. Stalin: Man or monster?

    He fell out of favour in 1929 and was a victim of the purges in 1938. He would've felt this way because he appeared to be stabbed in the back by Stalin. This leads me to believe that the source will be extremely biased against Stalin.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    C is similar as he looks at ease with the wives. The three images show contrasting images although A is quite different all are showing Stalin's need to demonstrate his achievements and successes to the rest of the world, whether humane or not.

  2. Stalin : Man or monster

    people and it also shows that he was admired by many people. All three sources shows the three different perspectives of Stalin, some people idolised him, some feared him and others thought of him as a evil dictator. 2.Does this source provide any useful evidence about Stalin?

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    It shows him to be a caring man who was congratulating the wives of his army officers. It shows him to be admired, even idolized by his people. This does show some Russians view of Stalin. . However many opposed Stalin and his policies.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    As well the speech was to the Congress of Soviets and therefore the man was in a way under pressure to say what he said, as for anything else he would have been imprisoned or killed, as were many men that tried to speak against Stalin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work