• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

vietnam coursework

Extracts from this document...


Aaron Locke Vietnam coursework How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States involved in the war in Vietnam? I am going to consider sources A to C and find how useful they are to explain why the United States became involved in Vietnam. Source A is a speech given by the U.S President Johnson in April 1965 making the source a primary source. President Johnson was speaking a month after the start of operation rolling thunder, rolling thunder was an operation the Americans used at the start of the Vietnam War It had three main objectives which were to reduce the infiltration, boost South Vietnamese morale and to inform Hanoi of the ever increasing expense of a continued insurgence in the south. ...read more.


Every American president has offered support to the people of South Vietnam. For independence, freedom and to let them govern there own country. They also became involved to strengthen world order. Johnson said that "From Berlin to Thailand" people can rely on them. If the Americans did not help in South Vietnam then people and countries would not be able to trust them. They also got involved to prevent more war and to keep world peace president Johnson was basically saying to the communists to stay where they are because he is trying to stop the spread of communism. Source B is a private conversation between President Johnson and an unknown person in may 1964 making it a primary source. ...read more.


and it is a speech that gives many of reasons why America entered the war. One of the problems with this source is that it is from an American point of view and may be biased or it could have been used as propaganda during the time and may have limitations on the context of the speech. Source B is a private conversation and is useful and is useful in many ways and reflects what the president feels about the war but because of what his feelings were at the time he could have said something that he did not mean which says that some of the information could be inaccurate and the private conversation could limit the details. Source C is by a critic of the war who believes it should not have happened so the information could be biased and only expressing his opinion on the war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    press, news agencies would never have exposed incidents such as those at Trang Bang and the war may well have continued for a long time afterwards. It is worth noting however that Source M indicates the media would bring an end to any future conflict by itself, whilst Source E

  2. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    We can tell that that the British people are not very supportive of the war because of the way it is being portrayed to them though different media such as this cartoon. The cartoon shows two railway tracks. On one of the tracks is the American train (symbolising the effects of the Vietnam War)

  1. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    He was then shot and the generals took control. Kennedy was assassinated in the same month. Due to the fact the Kennedy had made certain promises and deals with South Vietnam, when President Lyndon Johnson came to power he had to stay committed to these dealing and this proposes as another reason as to why America was involved in Vietnam.

  2. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    The deeper the credibility gap, the larger the polarisation of people from the Vietnam War, who would now see it in a negative light and therefore would not be likely to support it, both financially and physically through public endorsements.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work