• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Vietnam War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"To what extent did the American media influence the result of the Vietnam War." Wars that last more than 10 years would be considered as a very long time, especially for the families that wait for their young men to return without knowing that they are still alive or not. The medias or any news about the war would be very important to everyone waiting in the country, bringing joy, sorrow or hope to them. Vietnam War extended for 16 years from 1959-1975 until all the problems were to solutions which the media played an important role during the war. The result was significance that the Americans lost the war and it brought to the question "how". To a large degree that the American media influence the outcome of the war. The Americans send their troops across the globe to Vietnam which is new location for battle field which caused many concern to the U.S. military, government and their citizens. However the Americans were able to find the solution to this problem through the media coverage that would report everything to their people even if it not true. Vietnam War was the first "television war". During the 1960s, television was a new kind of media that was booming all around the world which entertain people with many programs and news update. ...read more.

Middle

Films and photographs of people dying, bombed schools and hospitals made people think they made no good in helping South Vietnam. The DRV device was one of the technologies which kept the US media informed. It was first used in World War II with the ability to count the number of death in wartime. The DRV was very effective to the anti-war movement in US and the rest of the world. Pictures had a huge impact to US. One famous picture which illustrates 9-year-old girl Kim Phuc escaping US attack which is bombing her village. She was partially burned and the boy next to her is her brother who lost an eye from the attack. This picture was very significance to many anti-war movements. Not only the scene of children suffering was point out, but from the information that the kids were South Vietnamese made the Americans reputation looked worst. The truth that this picture reveals was that the kids were attacked by their own side. Even though US President Nixon tried to dismiss it as a fake, but the situation was proved by the British television news team. This brought the US down to a certain level from the point that they were attacking the people who they were supposed to protect. ...read more.

Conclusion

The causalities difference was a big deal for both wars. World War I had modern technologies such as machine guns and artillery, but they still used old tactics such as infantry charge which resulted in stalemate and great slaughter. "Should I have resigned rather than agree to this slaughter of brave men at the Battle of Somme?" (David Lloyd George). However, the developing of technology made World War II caused more causalities. Submarines and tanks became larger, faster and more powerful. Naval ships also became larger and more powerful, and the introduction of the aircraft carrier may have been the most important development of the war. The most destructive weapon that was introduced was the atomic bomb. During World War II, over 60 millions people had died, including 20 millions soldiers and 40 millions civilians. The Second World War was more of a total war than the first, many civilians were killed. Many civilians died because of disease, starvation, massacres, bombing and deliberate genocide. Not only the difference in causalities was from the developed technologies, but there were both wars going on in Europe and in the Pacific. While both world wars involved many of the same combatants there were many more differences than similarities. The First World War set the stage for the Second World War. The most important difference between the world wars was their long term impact. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Did The Power Of Television Force The U.S. A To Leave Vietnam

    This source is trying not to fault the blame upon to the soldiers, but it's signifying that many soldiers had useful motives. I quote "many of them thought they were going to something courageous on behalf of their country". This was something which they thought was the ('American Ideal').

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    they might have seen more dramatic gruesome scenes possibly causing for opposition than if their media intake was a newspaper or something less graphic. This there gives me an indication of the effect uncensored media had on the course of the war.

  1. How was the opposition to the Vietnam war protrayed in contemporary literature, film and ...

    "Slow, rising hate makes people march and demonstrate" The American public was so opposed to the war that they wanted to protest against it.

  2. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    The Americans used the Ho Chi Minh trail to bring in logistics and this was affecting their economy. Also one problem for the Americans was that they had better rifles that the Vietcong and this meant the Vietcong could live of the Americans in terms of using American rifles against America.

  1. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    People in America could watch what was happening in Vietnam via TV. What the American people saw was America not only killing those at 'fault' but also several innocent people who had nothing to do with the war. Johnson had to justify these actions otherwise the public would loose faith in their own country.

  2. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    movement - it isn't that useful, since it doesn't mention any of the direct causes itself, instead implying various reasons for one explanation (i.e. giving reasons for the lack of progress which frustrated those in America). However, it does also give an impression that with the large numbers of deaths

  1. The Vietnam War.

    Meanwhile back in the U.S., President Truman, without consulting Congress, commits American troops to the Korean War under United Nations (UN) support. Truman also signs legislation fifteen million dollars in military aid to the French for the war in Indochina.(Karnow 43)

  2. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    to draw men and skills and money like some demonic, destructive suction tube." Eldrigde Cleaver, whom was similarly a Civil Rights activist like Martin Luther King, made the point that in many states in America blacks were not being allowed to vote for the government that they wanted so why

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work