• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

War led to totalitarianism, and totalitarianism in turn led to war. Comment on the validity of this statement with reference to the history of Germany and that of the Soviet Union in the inter-war period.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'War led to totalitarianism, and totalitarianism in turn led to war.' Comment on the validity of this statement with reference to the history of Germany and that of the Soviet Union in the inter-war period. 'War led to totalitarianism, and totalitarianism in turn led to war.' This statement is valid, accordingly, to Germany and the Soviet Union history in the inter-war period. The First World War triggered the rise of totalitarianism in Germany and in the Soviet Union, and totalitarianism in these two countries contributed to the outbreak of the Second World War, in a cycle. The post-war nationalist discontent and resentment over the Paris Peace Settlement was a vital source to the rise of totalitarianism in Germany. With the defeat of Germany in the First World War, Germany was pro claimed a republic, the Weimar Republic. It was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles, which was regarded as an unfair and harsh treaty to Germany, as it comprised stern punishments, such as 6,600 million pounds of reparations, demilitarization of Rhineland, territorial loss etc. The Republic was compelled to accept the war-guilt clause incorporated in the treaty, which meant Germany, had to bear the sole responsibility of the outbreak of the First World War. This was considered as a great insult and humiliation to the Germans. ...read more.

Middle

It was the Russo-Japanese War (1904-05) that they could start a real revolution, as the war revealed the weakness, and corruption of the government. The 1905 Revolution albeit was a failure, it laid a foundation for the future revolutions. However, Nicholas II's blunders, especially joining the First World War, triggered to the February Revolution and October Revolution in 1917. The February Revolution had overthrown the Czardom and set up a provisional government. The government failed because it made a fatal mistake of continuing the participation in the First World War. In the end, the government was overthrown in the October Revolution, and the Communist government was set up, the years followed showed the setting up of a totalitarian party control with strict leadership by Lenin. This paved the road to the rise of totalitarianism in Russia. The adoption of the appeasement policy by Britain and France attributed to the economic percussions and annihilation precipitated by the First World War, failed to check and hastened the rise of totalitarianism in the Soviet Union. After the war, industrial growth slowed down in Europe. There was increasing competition in Europe. Protectionism worsened the position further. Widespread tariffs made the sale of exports more difficult. Another effect of the war on economy was inflation. The war had to be paid for the device most used was borrowing from abroad. ...read more.

Conclusion

Germany further signed a military alliance with Italy, the Pact of Steel in 1939, in which Italy promised full military support if war came. The Soviet Union had also indirectly contributed to the outbreak of the Second World War by encouraging the aggression of Germany. In August 1939, a ten-year non-aggression pact had been concluded between the Soviets and the Nazis. A secret agreement concerning their spheres of influence was also concluded. The pact pledged the contracting parties to refrain from acts of aggression against on another for a period of ten years. In fact, the pact also showed the expansionist side of Stalin's foreign policy. 'Stalin gave the green light to aggression in 1939,' asserted Snell. These alliances had created a tension and war-like atmosphere throughout the whole Europe, even spread to Asia, which stimulated other countries' rearmaments and preparation for a war as they distrusted each other. Countries were expecting for a war soon. Inevitably, the Second World War broke out in this dense atmosphere when Germany invaded Poland in 1939. In conclusion, the history of Germany and the Soviet Union in the inter-war period had proved the validity of 'War led to totalitarianism, and totalitarianism in turn led to war.' It was a cycle that war prompted nationalist discontent, economic straits, and encouraged the appeasement of other European countries which led to the rise of totalitarianism, and the aggressive expansionist foreign policy of totalitarianism in turn ruined world peace and eventually led to war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Because they had expected and hoped the Treaty to be based on the fourteen-point plan so much it was even more of a let down when it was not, because they had built up their hopes only to be let down.

  2. World War I Coursework

    - supplies couldn't keep up with the troops and the Germans were forced to attack. They pushed the Allies back over twenty miles, but then ran out of supplies. With the help of the U.S.A., the Allies launched a counter-offensive and pushed Germany off the Hindenburg Line and broke the stalemate.

  1. "The breakdown of the Concert of Europe was mainly caused by disagreements amongst the ...

    Worst of all, Austria and Prussia did not see the usefulness of the alliance and they simply signed it to please Russia. The signing of Treaty of Quintuple was insincere. In 1818, after the Congress of Aix-La-Chappele, the Powers accepted France as the fifth Power, not treating it as a defeated power any more.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    It was not simply with this (and such provocations as the support for Austria during the Bosnian Crisis) that Germany lost the sympathy of the Powers - it appeared to them that she was quite indifferent to their attitude. 7.

  1. German Foreign Policy - To what extent was the German Foreign Policy responsible ...

    By the mid-1890s Britain was the only European Great Power not to be in alliance. The lack of an alliance did not mean that Britain would not sign international agreements, though when it did so the agreements were on specific issues.

  2. Identify and discuss cases for and against conscription in Australia in the period 1916-1918?

    If Australia helped Britain in its time of need they would probably return the favour if we ever needed help. For example if Australia was to help win the war for Britain by sending more men they would be more likely to send men and help us if we were ever under threat.

  1. Was it the British governments' policy of appeasement which led to war breaking out ...

    3 He was aware he could not risk war, as Britain was too weak. Her economic decline was rapid yet her worldwide commitments were larger than they had been before the First World War. The British public certainly didn't want another war4.

  2. Revision notes - History of First World War and the Role of Women

    Black Hand: secret Serbian society 1. Black hand wanted to force Austria from Balkans 1. Franz Ferdinand (archduke of Austria) visited Sarajevo in Bosnia Herzegovina 1. At 11 o?clock, he was shot while in a carriage with his pregnant wife by Cavrilo Princip 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work