• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was 1924-29 A Political And Economic Golden Age?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In order to assess whether or not these years were actually part of a golden age for Germany, we must compare it both economically and politically with the years immediately before and also the economic and political progress of other countries of similar size, power and development during the same time period. A significant improvement on previous years and improvement on similar or better scales to rival the other major nations would indicate a golden age. Immediately before the period we are looking at, Germany was suffering from inflation and ultimately hyper-inflation as well as a depression after the period we are looking at, in 1929. This would indicate some sort of recovery in the six years between these dates. Economically, Germany was heavily dependent on the after-effects of the Dawes Plan of 1924 which rescheduled the payments of reparations due from Germany and spread the burden according to prosperity. This along with American loans enabled the expansion of German industry and the implementation of new industrial techniques used by the other powerful nations. The government was channeling all it could into industry and public work schemes (such as swimming pools, opera houses and huge apartment blocks), increased welfare benefits, better industrial relations ultimately resulting in greater prosperity being shared by the population as a whole. ...read more.

Middle

There was split opinion over where any increasing profits should be spent with socialists feeling that wages should be increased and industrialists arguing for more investment in already saturated markets. Unemployment was never really addressed also. Slight falls took place between 1926 and 1927 after which point it continued to rise. The agriculture sector saw nothing of the prosperity being experienced elsewhere. Increased competition from overseas producers who had been more rapid in accepting modernization practices resulted in lower prices and the benefits of greater efficiency were never felt by German farmers who actually saw decreasing agricultural prices. Between 1924 and 1929, the political system also appears to have been stable. In previous years we had seen the Spartacist uprising, the Kapp Putsch, and the Munich Putsch as well as many political assassinations. However, during this period there were no such events. Parties in opposition to the Republic were in the decline on both the left and right. Between the 1924 and 1928 elections for example, the extremist KPD party saw a decrease in its number of seats, as well as the DNVP and the Nazis also. At the same time, all the parties expected to support the republic were increasing their representation. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Reichstag always felt under threat. Both the economic and political situation in Germany between 1924 and 1929 seem, on the surface to be very stable and possibly veering to what can be referred to as a 'Golden Age.' However, both had fundamental flaws which became apparent immediately after the end of this period. For example, the prosperity seen by some Germans was always very fragile due to its reliance on foreign success, primarily USA. Even whilst this so called 'golden age' was around, the agricultural industry was suffering badly and consumer demand was not high enough to take advantage of the increased efficiency in industry. Politically, support for the Weimar Republic seems to have merely been a rejection of Communism rather than support for Weimar, and support decreased continually with every agreement giving in to foreign nations, made by Stressemann. The right wing extremist parties were gradually building support and it can now be seen that the fault lines were apparent during this period which were later to cause collapse and the depression of 1929. Therefore I don't think it would be correct to refer to this as a 'Golden Age' although there were significant improvements when compared to the period immediately preceding this one. By Amandeep Bindra ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. How far was 1924-29 a golden age in weimar germany?

    A new currency was introduced, the Rentenmark, by Gustav Stresemann to stop hyperinflation. This decreased the support for the extremist political parties, like the Nazi's and communists because the government was starting to stabilize Germany. Moderate pro-Weimar parties tended to win elections.

  2. 'Was 1924-29 a Golden Age for the WeimarRepublic? '

    to be understood by ordinary people, and they believed that art should comment on the society of the time.

  1. How golden were the "Golden years"1924-29?

    Stresemann's idea became real when The Wall Street Crash led to the withdrawal of American loans which financed the recovery of 1924. As a consequence of this unemployment shot up to 4 million in 1931. I conclude that the German economy was "Golden" on the surface but really it was not golden at all.

  2. To what extent did the period 1924 - 1929 represent a golden age in ...

    Despite this increased production there was no enlarged volume in foreign trade so, even with consumer demand filling part of gap, mass production was not entirely useful. Real wages and standard of living both rose in this 'Golden' age. But the increased income only paid for the higher cost of

  1. Weimar, 1924 - 1929

    Other problems are listed below. * Revelations of gay activities amongst some of the party leadership caused a reduction in support from ordinary people, and led to both Ludendorff and Count von Reventlow breaking away from the party. * The NSDAP itself had been outlawed, causing the need for the creation of splinter groups.

  2. A Period of Relative Stability - The Dawes Plan and the Creation of Economic ...

    President Hindenburg evidently agreed with this sentiment, refusing to sanction a coalition containing the SPD (the two exceptions being Stesemann's Government in 1923 and Muller's in 1928). The attitude of the SPD led to a total of six governments out of the eight formed between 1923 and 1930 being implemented without a majority in the Reichstag creating a vast instability.

  1. Account for the political stability of the Weimar between 1924-29.

    Beginning with J.Wirth, a co-operative policy of 'fulfilment' or 'Erfsfullpolitick' was pursued. Stresemann continued this policy with three aims in mind: to modify Versailles; to end German diplomatic isolation and finally to restore sovereignty. By 1931, all three had been more or less achieved.

  2. Nazi economic system.

    With these measures in place the unemployment figure had to fall drastically and many saw the Nazi figures as nothing more than a book-keeping trick. However, many would have been too scared to speak out against the Nazis or pass negative comments on the published figures - such was the fear of the Gestapo.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work