• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was appeasement Justified? What was "appeasement"?

Extracts from this document...


Assignment 2 - Historical Interpretations WAS APPEASEMENT JUSTIFIED? What was "appeasement"? The definition of appeasement is a policy, which is made to keep peace. However, there are many different definitions. Before the Second World War appeasement was a term which meant 'a way of keeping peace by soothing, quieting and calming. Yet, postwar dictionaries added new meanings to the word. Appeasement came to mean 'gaining peace by buying off other countries' and 'the giving up of principles to avoid war'. This change in views resulted from Neville Chamberlain's act of appeasement and ultimately his failure to keep the peace. The policy of appeasement began when many Germans believed that Germany's position in the Treaty of Versailles was unfair. Adolph Hitler shared this view; he also believed that many other countries thought the Treaty was unfair on Germany. Hitler began to secretly rearm Germany in 1933 and by 1935 felt confident enough to announce that conscription (compulsory military service) was to be reintroduced. This obvious attack on the Treaty of Versailles left the leaders of Britain, France and Italy feeling suspicious of Germany. ...read more.


Therefore the historian's different views on appeasement can be categorized into four time periods. The first of these periods is during the policy of appeasement. Source F1 shows the first Lord of the Admiralty blaming the policy of appeasement for the start of the war. He mentions how Neville Chamberlain's views were never even mentioned in the meeting with Hitler. He says how Hitler did not seem to yield on any point that he put forward. Source H2 is Lord Halifax's view of appeasement. Unlike the Lord of the Admiralty, Halifax defends Neville Chamberlain and says that he done the best that he could and he believed that Chamberlain had done all he possibly could to spare Europe the ordeal of war. However, he still blames Chamberlain for raising the hopes of the public by using phrases such as 'peace for our time'. The second time period is the post war period; this is where Neville Chamberlain was directly blamed for the outbreak of the war. However, this theory assumes that Britain still had the power to take on Hitler. ...read more.


Source O5 tells us how the British Ambassador to Germany, Sir Neville Henderson, was so sympathetic to Hitler and that he was commonly known as 'our Nazi Ambassador on Berlin'. This view shows that during this period the historians had more hindsight and also acted more rationally, their view on appeasement therefore was more revised and not emotionally fuelled. More recent sources seem to hold Neville Chamberlain less responsible. Sources A6 and B7 both defend Chamberlain. Source A argues that Neville Chamberlain was not a pacifist; he argues that no one linked the rearmament of Germany with Hitler's ambitions. He also states that Chamberlain believed that the British rearmament would make a point to all dictators that the alternative to negotiation was unthinkable. Source B tells us how popular the Munich agreement was to the British public> 1 First Lord of Admiralty, diary entry (17th September 1938) 2 Lord Halifax, in his memoirs Fullness of days, (September 1938) 3 Winston Churchill, speech in the house of commons, (22nd February, 1938) 4 A.J.P. Taylor, Origins of the Second World War, (1961 5 W.R.Rock, British appeasement in the 1930's, (1977) 6 A.J.Beattie, An argument for Chamberlain not being a pacifist. 7 Advice for Conscientious Objectors: document found on the Internet. Richard Price 11B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Was Appeasement A Mistake?

    that for the time being Britain should not do anything until she was ready for war.

  2. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    By making out the Italian soldier as big and armed, the message being sent across is that the old man/LoN cannot do anything about the soldier; all it could possibly do is go back inside and accept what has been said.

  1. what were the roots of the british policy of appeasement?

    The Allies had been occupied with the crisis in Abyssinia. 3 "Allies were preoccupied with Italy's invasion of Abyssinia". The Rhineland had been ordered to be permanently demilitarized in the Treaty of Versailles. It was on the 2nd of March that Hitler issued the order and it was on the 7th of March that the troops moved into the Rhineland.

  2. The Policy of Appeasement

    Czechoslovakia was not invited. But now the big gamble was yet to come. In 1939 Hitler invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia in violation of the agreement. War was now coming. Britain and France had simply stepped aside and allowed Hitler to take control of wherever he liked.

  1. To What Extent was British Appeasement to Germany in the Interwar Period Justified?

    It permitted Germany to increase its Navy to one-third the size of the British Royal Navy and the same tonnage of submarines, thus breaching the Treaty of Versailles. Appeasement was again reflected when Britain didn't react against Hitler when he occupied the Rhineland (March 1936).

  2. How did Appeasement lead to the outbreak of the Second World War ? The ...

    Up to that point they had been the worst of enemies. This was a very rare event for the two countries which took Britain and France to surprise. Britain had hoped that Russia would fight against Germany for Poland but now they were signing a pact!

  1. With the benefit of hindsight, for some people today it can be difficult to ...

    Germain. The Anschlu´┐Ż idea was not something merely typical of the National-Socialists. Adolf Hitler was born in Branau an der Inn in Austria and had always been an advocate of the Anschlu´┐Ż. The democratic republican governments of Germany and Austria had previously played with the thought of the two countries uniting.

  2. British Policy of Appeasement May 1937 - March 1939.

    Not much longer after that, at the Munich Conference in 1938, Hitler was granted autonomy for the Sudetenland. Hitler reasoned that there were 3 million Germans in the western region of Czechoslovakia, so the German Government should be able to preside over them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work