• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Appeasement the Best Policy to Adopt in the 1930’s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was Appeasement the Best Policy to Adopt in the 1930's? Appeasement means, compromise. Some saw appeasement as giving Germany what they wanted. Others saw it as everyone purely trying to keep the peace. In 1938 everyone in Britain was pleased that war had been avoided. Chamberlain was a hero. His policy of appeasement seemed to have saved Europe from another devastating war. But, soon it was clear that the policy had failed, as soon as Hitler made his next aggressive move. Appeasement quickly became a word, which represented cowardice and failure. Chamberlain had tried to satisfy Hitler's demands whilst re-arming Britain in case force had to be used. ...read more.

Middle

Some say that Britain should have defended Czechoslovakia in 1938 and 1939. It would have been a quick war in 1938. Although some people do argue against this, in hindsight we know that Hitler never intended a long war. His preparations indicate that he expected a series of short campaigns rather than a war. German generals were plotting to remove Hitler in 1938 and if Britain and France had faced up to Hitler, the generals might have thought they had more international support and been successful. In 1938 - 1939 Britain bought time to re-arm, the only problem was that this also gave Hitler more time. Britains leaders were desperate to avoid war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Others say that appeasement was sensible because Germany's early demands, including the Sudetneland, were reasonable - they were simply about recovering German land and people lost at Versailles. Meeting these demands might satisfy Hitler. And that Britain was worried that Japan would threaten the Empire in the Far East. Britain was not strong enough to fight Germany and Japan at the same time. Chamberlain thought that, "The best policy is to hope for the best, but be prepared for the worst." His reasoning in appeasing Hitler was that of sacrificing a little instead of a lot through war. In my opinion appeasement was not the best policy to adopt in the 1930's. I also think that appeasement was a large factor in the cause of World War 2 along with Hitler's desire to undo the Treaty of Versailles - as stated in "Mein Kampf." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. what were the roots of the british policy of appeasement?

    On 12/02/1938 Von Schuschnigg, successor to Dolfuss, was summoned to Berchstgaden, Hitler's private headquarters in Bavaria. Hitler insisted that Schuschnigg should include Nazis in his cabinet. Schuschnigg complied but announced shortly afterwards on the 9th March that a plebiscite would be held to enable for Austria to decide for themselves whether they wished to be joined by Germany.

  2. British Policy of Appeasement May 1937 - March 1939.

    September 1938, and on 29th September, Adolf Hitler, Neville Chamberlain, Edouard Daladier and Benito Mussolini signed the Munich Agreement which transferred to Germany the Sudetenland - a fortified frontier region in Czechoslovakia that contained a large German-speaking population. When the Czechoslovakian head of state, Eduard Benes, who had not been

  1. Was Appeasement A Mistake?

    When Germany later invaded Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, the majority of the British public and politicians were reluctant to go to Czechoslovakia's aid because they felt that it was a small, irrelevant country that had hardly anything to do with Britain, and that it was certainly not worth driving the world into another dreadful war over the matter.

  2. Why did Britain and France pursue a policy of appeasement? Was it successful?

    As a result of the desolation a common consensus was becoming apparent amid the general public. There were no clear societal gains from the war and the obvious economic and political decline of the country showed no gains in that sector either.

  1. Is "appeasement" as a kind of cowardice?

    It's possible that a different stand by the Allies at Munich would have prevented or postponed World War II. It's also possible that the war would have started sooner if the Allies had threatened Hitler with military force. No one will ever know.

  2. Was appeasement a mistake?

    In 1938 people decided that if war did come with Germany then it would better for them if the started to fight in 6 to 12 months. Nevertheless, it also helped the Germans to get better defences and to think through their plan again before going straight in a defeating

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work