• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Belgian resistance the main cause of the failure of the Schlieffen Plan?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐When the German northern groups invaded Belgium during the early stages of the Schlieffen plan, the Belgians put up a heroic resistance against them with help from the British and the French. At the battle of Mons, the Germans met heavy resistance but it can be said that Belgium was not the key reason the Schlieffen Plan failed as there were many other events in French, such as the battle at the River Aisne. There is much evidence to show that Belgium put up an effective resistance against the Germans. It is known that the Belgians put up face resistance against the Germans at the battle of Mons and this force them to retreat. ...read more.

Middle

Many people did in fact believe that Belgium was the main reason for the Schlieffen plan?s failure. On the other hand, there is much evidence to support the fact that it was other factors that resulted in the failure of the Schlieffen plan and not the Belgian resistance. Belgium has been portrayed as a weak boy in somehistorical cartoons, and this could go to show that there was not much hope for them. Furthermore, certain sources state that the German advance in Belgium was crushing and unstoppable and that the Belgian resistance was heroic but ineffective. This suggests that the failure of the Schlieffen plan was almost definitely because of the events in France and Russia?s actions. ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition the German tactical failures east of Paris, meant that the Allies were able to fight back and disrupt the plan. Furthermore, von Moltke?s decision to remove 100000 German troops from Belgium and instead move them down into France meant that the German offensive through Belgium was not slow due to Belgian resistance, but moreso due to poor planning. Overall, my opinion is that the Belgian resistance was not the main reason for the Schlieffen Plan?s failure, as not only were there other more significant factors to its failure, but also, the fact that much evidence shows that the Germans faced very little resistance in Belgium, so it was not much of a problem for them and this therefore shows that other factors had a much larger effect. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why did the Schlieffen Plan fail?

    And there is truth in this. If the Belgians hadn't held up the Germans, and cause some to be diverted away from the main plan, then the Germans may have had a chance of sweeping around Paris and encircling it.

  2. The Failure Of The Schlieffen Plan

    Even though the Germans had been held up by the Belgian, British and French, the Russians still got to the border before the expected date for the Germans to arrive if they hadn't been held up. The Russians outnumbered the remains of the German army 4:1, but most of the

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    However, the greatest technological advance was in the navy. Ships had guns that could fire over 10km, the range, accuracy and power of torpedoes was increased and ships could use radio to intercept enemy communications, therefore surprising any German boats and attacking them. Aircraft carriers and planes were becoming increasingly more common for reconnaissance purposed and mines were also

  2. Failure of the Schlieffen Plan.

    Over 250,000 French soldiers perished trying to overcome the German forces, a similar number of German soldiers are thought to have been killed in This early battle. A stalemate had been reached and the French and British now had to consolidate their positions and dig in themselves.

  1. Schlieffen Plan

    The plan involved attacking Belgium and then proceeding south in France. Unfortunately for Germany, the Belgium's didn't simply step aside for the Germans but they fought back making it much harder for Germany to carry out the Schlieffen plan. Aside from these war plans Germany also tried to stop countries

  2. Explain how Moltke modified the Schlieffen Plan.

    Therefore this source is neither relevant nor useful. It could have actually worked though if they had actually stuck to the original plan but instead Moltke rapidly changed it. Source B is once again, a map and therefore it doesn't really show any fact or clarity. This map is that of the one that Moltke amended.

  1. Explain How The Schlieffen Plan Was Meant To Work

    The small German force of 4 divisions situated along the Franco-German border would entice the French to move forward in an attempt to regain Alsace Lorraine. Only then would Paris be attacked by the main bulk of the 37 1/2 divisions of the German army.

  2. How Important was the Role of the BEF in the Failure of the Schlieffen ...

    The British Expiditionary Force (BEF) was made up of 100,000 well equipped, trained and experienced soldiers, far better than the civilian conscripts of France and Germany's armies. Also, whereas the other armies had not had experience, the BEF had fantastic experience in the field during the Boer war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work