• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Britain well prepared for WW2?

Extracts from this document...


This essay will conclude whether Britain was well prepared to meet the threat of invasion in 1940. The different areas covered are the public precautions, Morale, the Battle of Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain, General Ironside's plan as well as the sources from Merchant Taylors. Britain was well prepared as the fact that Britain was preparing for a war two months before the potential invasion shows that they were well prepared in ensuring the safety of their citizens. Source 2 on page 152 states "street lighting will be put out" showing that the government were informing everybody what to do and using precautions such as gas masks and air raid shelters. The Battle of Dunkirk could have been portrayed as a triumph as in May 1940, even though the Germans were leading the attack, the British pulled together and Winston Churchill announced 'Operation Dynamo' indicating that all British ships, whether it being a large vessel or fishing boat came to take away the British troops showing the heroism of the British people and most of the soldiers were taken back. ...read more.


Source B shows that Merchant Taylor's had "goal posts", "sandbags...anti-tank ditches and pill-boxes" to stop the Germans again reinforcing the idea that they were well prepared. The pillboxes were also efficient in that they could shoot down many people and could withstand an eight inch shell. However, Britain was also not prepared for the war. In terms of the civilian precautions, many gas masks were actually making people sicker and the evacuation went wrong in that people were sent to the wrong places. Although Britain had a Dad's Army, it was actually said to be ineffective showing that they did not prepare their volunteers enough. The Battle of Dunkirk was also a disaster as they were very lucky not to all be killed and they also lost most of their weapons as shown by source 11 indicating that people were "deserted" and very "dispirited". The Battle of Britain gave a clear indication Britain were not well prepared. ...read more.


Overall, I believe that Britain was not well prepared for the invasion. The Battle of Dunkirk was an early sign to show how unprepared they were as they were slow and also lost most of their equipment there. The Battle of Britain showed how the pilots and planes were not up to standard compared to the Germans. The victory seemed to be down to a lot of luck from a single bad call from the German general. The Merchant Taylor's Sources also suggest that they were inexperienced and could not have stood up to a German Army. However, there are also some signs which would have shown they were ready for invasion such as the fact that the Germans could not have destroyed the Royal Navy or Air Force and so the British were prepared already as the Germans couldn't have defeated the British. The fact that the British won shows that they were prepared and the sources give suggestions that many precautions were taken to make them well prepared. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. To what ways and to what extent did the lives of the British people ...

    These children had to carry around gas masks and stay as close to a shelter as possible. Source A5 is a poster that gives times for blackouts. The photographs in source A3 shows all the damage that happened around these children.

  2. Assimilation. The problem with immigration in Britain was that the people werent coming from ...

    Today assimilation appears to be working fine in most places thanks to the laws that were introduced. However there were sacrifices that were made in order to achieve this peace. I strongly believe that the concept was successful but people judged it to early.

  1. F Bommber Command decisive in bringing about victrory for Britan WW2

    RAF Bomber Command was known for targeting German cities in a so-called "de-housing" operation. However, ironically it was only because of the failure of precision bombing in the first place which meant that 53% of Bomber Command's resources were allocated to area bombing after 1942.

  2. Evacuation in WW2

    Overall, I would say that Source C is more useful in describing the beginning of the children's journey through Evacuation. Q2) Source G is an extract taken from a novel. Is it reliable as evidence about evacuees? Explain your answer using Source G and knowledge from your studies.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Nearly all of the troops returned from Dunkirk were demoralised and existed as names only, the evacuation was only reinforced as a military victory by Churchill. The publics' reaction was more of relief that things weren't worse. Other sources showing demoralisation due to Dunkirk are 1,3,4,7,12,14(ii),15 and 19.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Source number 3 supports this view. It contains photographs of Dunkirk's beaches taken by the Germans. The source shows sunken and beached vessels with abandoned equipment, and a few British soldiers lying dead on the beach. The scene looks disorganised and chaotic again linking in with the idea of panic.

  1. Defeat, deliverace or victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    attempting to flee as fast as possible and fend for their lives. te source is first hand and so is most probably well informed and reliable. The writer does not apear to be baised, although he may be baised in a patriotic way towards his country or baised against it due to the harsh conditions he suffered.

  2. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    This makes the source important because the author influences the reliability and validity a lot. Due to the fact that a historian it makes it more reliable because he has a benefit of hindsight, which he could make a balanced judgement of whether Dunkirk was a victory or a defeat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work