• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Britain well prepared for WW2?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

This essay will conclude whether Britain was well prepared to meet the threat of invasion in 1940. The different areas covered are the public precautions, Morale, the Battle of Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain, General Ironside's plan as well as the sources from Merchant Taylors. Britain was well prepared as the fact that Britain was preparing for a war two months before the potential invasion shows that they were well prepared in ensuring the safety of their citizens. Source 2 on page 152 states "street lighting will be put out" showing that the government were informing everybody what to do and using precautions such as gas masks and air raid shelters. The Battle of Dunkirk could have been portrayed as a triumph as in May 1940, even though the Germans were leading the attack, the British pulled together and Winston Churchill announced 'Operation Dynamo' indicating that all British ships, whether it being a large vessel or fishing boat came to take away the British troops showing the heroism of the British people and most of the soldiers were taken back. ...read more.

Middle

Source B shows that Merchant Taylor's had "goal posts", "sandbags...anti-tank ditches and pill-boxes" to stop the Germans again reinforcing the idea that they were well prepared. The pillboxes were also efficient in that they could shoot down many people and could withstand an eight inch shell. However, Britain was also not prepared for the war. In terms of the civilian precautions, many gas masks were actually making people sicker and the evacuation went wrong in that people were sent to the wrong places. Although Britain had a Dad's Army, it was actually said to be ineffective showing that they did not prepare their volunteers enough. The Battle of Dunkirk was also a disaster as they were very lucky not to all be killed and they also lost most of their weapons as shown by source 11 indicating that people were "deserted" and very "dispirited". The Battle of Britain gave a clear indication Britain were not well prepared. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, I believe that Britain was not well prepared for the invasion. The Battle of Dunkirk was an early sign to show how unprepared they were as they were slow and also lost most of their equipment there. The Battle of Britain showed how the pilots and planes were not up to standard compared to the Germans. The victory seemed to be down to a lot of luck from a single bad call from the German general. The Merchant Taylor's Sources also suggest that they were inexperienced and could not have stood up to a German Army. However, there are also some signs which would have shown they were ready for invasion such as the fact that the Germans could not have destroyed the Royal Navy or Air Force and so the British were prepared already as the Germans couldn't have defeated the British. The fact that the British won shows that they were prepared and the sources give suggestions that many precautions were taken to make them well prepared. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    These factors include the decision of Lord Gort to ignore Churchill's and the French Commanders orders and head for the coast, the halting of the German tanks which allowed Britain valuable time, the survival of the Eastern Mole from which the majority of troops were evacuated, the smoke from the

  2. Evacuation in WW2

    I actually don't think the Government even knew where most of the evacuees were going. This made the process harder to carry out with mothers crying at the side of the station and the children refusing to go onto the trains in the station.

  1. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    The photographs of soldiers being evacuated from Dunkirk shows soldiers neck high in water boarding vessels in an orderly line. The men look organised and there is no sign of panic or struggles for the boat. There are a lot of people in these pictures, so this suggests that a large number of people escaped.

  2. Cambridge indicates that they were prepared, but were they as ready as they say.

    This account says that the evacuation family this boy got put with were unwelcoming and lonely. In contrast source B and C, B was from memories of an evacuee, just saying the plans for evacuation of London university and the London school of economics had gone through and the were now studying in Bedford college and in Cambridge.

  1. Assimilation. The problem with immigration in Britain was that the people werent coming from ...

    Due to this error assimilation was already under fire and hungry politicians soon used this to there advantage. The problem with immigration in Britain was that the people weren't coming from the same country or origins. Instead they appeared from many different colonies that all differed from each other in terms of language and traditions.

  2. F Bommber Command decisive in bringing about victrory for Britan WW2

    The Avro Lancaster was known as an double functional aircraft as it could reach speeds of 266 mph and had a bomb load of 14000lb, which was the largest out of any other bomber on the British or German side.

  1. To what ways and to what extent did the lives of the British people ...

    This demand also meant wages went up but prices stayed the same which meant many of the poorer men found themselves slightly better off. The even poorer men who weren't able to get jobs benefited from rationing because they now had a steady supply of good food.

  2. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    This makes the source important because the author influences the reliability and validity a lot. Due to the fact that a historian it makes it more reliable because he has a benefit of hindsight, which he could make a balanced judgement of whether Dunkirk was a victory or a defeat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work