• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Britain well prepared for WW2?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

This essay will conclude whether Britain was well prepared to meet the threat of invasion in 1940. The different areas covered are the public precautions, Morale, the Battle of Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain, General Ironside's plan as well as the sources from Merchant Taylors. Britain was well prepared as the fact that Britain was preparing for a war two months before the potential invasion shows that they were well prepared in ensuring the safety of their citizens. Source 2 on page 152 states "street lighting will be put out" showing that the government were informing everybody what to do and using precautions such as gas masks and air raid shelters. The Battle of Dunkirk could have been portrayed as a triumph as in May 1940, even though the Germans were leading the attack, the British pulled together and Winston Churchill announced 'Operation Dynamo' indicating that all British ships, whether it being a large vessel or fishing boat came to take away the British troops showing the heroism of the British people and most of the soldiers were taken back. ...read more.

Middle

Source B shows that Merchant Taylor's had "goal posts", "sandbags...anti-tank ditches and pill-boxes" to stop the Germans again reinforcing the idea that they were well prepared. The pillboxes were also efficient in that they could shoot down many people and could withstand an eight inch shell. However, Britain was also not prepared for the war. In terms of the civilian precautions, many gas masks were actually making people sicker and the evacuation went wrong in that people were sent to the wrong places. Although Britain had a Dad's Army, it was actually said to be ineffective showing that they did not prepare their volunteers enough. The Battle of Dunkirk was also a disaster as they were very lucky not to all be killed and they also lost most of their weapons as shown by source 11 indicating that people were "deserted" and very "dispirited". The Battle of Britain gave a clear indication Britain were not well prepared. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, I believe that Britain was not well prepared for the invasion. The Battle of Dunkirk was an early sign to show how unprepared they were as they were slow and also lost most of their equipment there. The Battle of Britain showed how the pilots and planes were not up to standard compared to the Germans. The victory seemed to be down to a lot of luck from a single bad call from the German general. The Merchant Taylor's Sources also suggest that they were inexperienced and could not have stood up to a German Army. However, there are also some signs which would have shown they were ready for invasion such as the fact that the Germans could not have destroyed the Royal Navy or Air Force and so the British were prepared already as the Germans couldn't have defeated the British. The fact that the British won shows that they were prepared and the sources give suggestions that many precautions were taken to make them well prepared. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. To what ways and to what extent did the lives of the British people ...

    Rationing also became a serious problem for the middleclass children as they were not used to having limitations on what they could eat and wear. For the poorer children however rationing became a good change. Even though they also had to suffer the Blitz many were evacuated, and not all foster parents were bad.

  2. Assimilation. The problem with immigration in Britain was that the people werent coming from ...

    I believe that Ms Amos demonstrates that assimilation is not flawed to a certain extent. She proves that if you accept the British culture and behave British then assimilation is possible. In my opinion source G tells us that assimilation can't work if you're not willing to adapt to the host society and refuse to give up your traditions.

  1. F Bommber Command decisive in bringing about victrory for Britan WW2

    The reason why there was a change from precise industrial targets to large urbanised areas was because of the overall inaccuracy of Bomber Command. In late 1942 the average bomb error was 1,000 yards and even as technology developed and better mapping devices became available it was only reduced to

  2. Evacuation in WW2

    I think Source G is reliable as evidence about some evacuees because it was true that people who lived in the city were poorer than people who lived in the countryside. To live in the countryside and to own land, people had to have a considerable amount of money at their disposal.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    the source in ,'and naval officers using their revolvers' illustrating a scene of total chaos and panic, even amongst the officers. The information seems reliable as the account is primary and first hand and although from a British author doesn't seem biased.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    This source is quite reliable as it is written one day after the evacuation showing Churchill's immediate reaction to Dunkirk. We know that Dunkirk could have been a military disaster if Hitler had not ordered the stop of his tanks, which allowed the evacuation more time.

  1. Defeat, deliverace or victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    It is difficult to determine bais but is probably truthfull and reliable on the whole. from what i know of the events at Dunkirk, this appears to be written about the 29th of may as this is a time in which winds allowed visibility for the Luftwaffe to attack the beaches.

  2. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    This makes the source important because the author influences the reliability and validity a lot. Due to the fact that a historian it makes it more reliable because he has a benefit of hindsight, which he could make a balanced judgement of whether Dunkirk was a victory or a defeat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work