• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Britain well prepared for WW2?

Extracts from this document...


This essay will conclude whether Britain was well prepared to meet the threat of invasion in 1940. The different areas covered are the public precautions, Morale, the Battle of Dunkirk, the Battle of Britain, General Ironside's plan as well as the sources from Merchant Taylors. Britain was well prepared as the fact that Britain was preparing for a war two months before the potential invasion shows that they were well prepared in ensuring the safety of their citizens. Source 2 on page 152 states "street lighting will be put out" showing that the government were informing everybody what to do and using precautions such as gas masks and air raid shelters. The Battle of Dunkirk could have been portrayed as a triumph as in May 1940, even though the Germans were leading the attack, the British pulled together and Winston Churchill announced 'Operation Dynamo' indicating that all British ships, whether it being a large vessel or fishing boat came to take away the British troops showing the heroism of the British people and most of the soldiers were taken back. ...read more.


Source B shows that Merchant Taylor's had "goal posts", "sandbags...anti-tank ditches and pill-boxes" to stop the Germans again reinforcing the idea that they were well prepared. The pillboxes were also efficient in that they could shoot down many people and could withstand an eight inch shell. However, Britain was also not prepared for the war. In terms of the civilian precautions, many gas masks were actually making people sicker and the evacuation went wrong in that people were sent to the wrong places. Although Britain had a Dad's Army, it was actually said to be ineffective showing that they did not prepare their volunteers enough. The Battle of Dunkirk was also a disaster as they were very lucky not to all be killed and they also lost most of their weapons as shown by source 11 indicating that people were "deserted" and very "dispirited". The Battle of Britain gave a clear indication Britain were not well prepared. ...read more.


Overall, I believe that Britain was not well prepared for the invasion. The Battle of Dunkirk was an early sign to show how unprepared they were as they were slow and also lost most of their equipment there. The Battle of Britain showed how the pilots and planes were not up to standard compared to the Germans. The victory seemed to be down to a lot of luck from a single bad call from the German general. The Merchant Taylor's Sources also suggest that they were inexperienced and could not have stood up to a German Army. However, there are also some signs which would have shown they were ready for invasion such as the fact that the Germans could not have destroyed the Royal Navy or Air Force and so the British were prepared already as the Germans couldn't have defeated the British. The fact that the British won shows that they were prepared and the sources give suggestions that many precautions were taken to make them well prepared. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    well researched and as it was written in 1990 he would have had access to many other sources, this makes it more reliable. The information given coincides with other sources. The source however seems very one sided and bias which may be because the British were the author's target audience so to please them would ensure good sales.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The source is primary evidence, so it may be a part of propaganda (We can see that the title of the book is called 'Their finest hour') and he tells the nation the amount of troops saved, he probably increased the figures a little, however the figures do look accurate.

  1. To what ways and to what extent did the lives of the British people ...

    Not everyone was evacuated though. Just under a half of all London schools were evacuated meaning many other children had to stay and face rationing as well as the biggest change of all, the Blitz. This meant continues blackouts, sirens and the threat of German invasion.

  2. Cambridge indicates that they were prepared, but were they as ready as they say.

    This account says that the evacuation family this boy got put with were unwelcoming and lonely. In contrast source B and C, B was from memories of an evacuee, just saying the plans for evacuation of London university and the London school of economics had gone through and the were now studying in Bedford college and in Cambridge.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Another aspect of defeat is the loss of troops and equipment. The BEF had lost and left behind virtually all of its equipment. It had been forced to abandon 2,472 guns, 90,000 rifles, 63,879 vehicle, 20,548 motorcycles and over 500,000 tons of stores and ammunition.

  2. Defeat, deliverace or victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The he descries a Luftwaffe attack and the way in which the troops respond to the bombing and the shooting is in no way structured or prepared for, it is disorganised and it appers as though everyone is just

  1. Evacuation in WW2

    One of the major arguments against Evacuation was the relationship between the host family and the evacuees. As Source E states, 'Although we told the children and their mother off about their filthy habits, they took no notice'. This proves that there was always tension between the two groups of people.

  2. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    Source B10 is a secondary source which also contradicts the interpretation that the Battle of Dunkirk was a triumph. The author of the source is John Harris, a historian writing about Dunkirk in a book about great military battles, published in 1988.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work