• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Custer to blame for the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Custer was to blame for the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn". How far do you agree, giving reasons and examples? Although it can be said that the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn is solely down to General Custer, I am of the distinct opinion that numerous different factors contributed to the aforementioned defeat. Firstly, there are many reasons why some historians believe Custer was responsible for the defeat. He disobeyed direct orders from superiors to wait for them before proceeding to attack. He was even told by Gibbon "Now, Custer, don't be greedy; wait for us". This further shows that he didn't have a lot of trust from the superiors as they felt it necessary to tell him this. As he rode away, he replied "No, I won't" - something that could be argued either way. Either he wouldn't be greedy, or he wouldn't wait. So, glory hunter Custer set off southwards to circle round the Wolf Mountains before proceeding northwards to the Indian camp where Gibbon and Terry would meet him. ...read more.

Middle

and tried to attacked overwhelming numbers of warriors without knowing the lie of the land. Subsequently, this may have been the fatal error losing the battle. However, the fault may have rested upon his subordinate officers, Reno and Benteen. They didn't try to force Custer to follow orders and wait for Gibbon and Terry as well as they could and should have done. They also didn't complain to Custer about his choice of splitting the army into even smaller divisions which weakened the army's performance as a whole. The fact remains that Reno could have gone to Custer's assistance whilst he was surrounded - Custer had sent a message requesting just that. Instead, he retreated across the river taking up a defensive position, he didn't go to Custer's aid, and moreover, he didn't 'press home' the attack. Custer's superiors, including Terry and Sheridan could also have been partly responsible for the battle being lost. ...read more.

Conclusion

Crazy Horse's battle tactics, for example, seemed to have followed a plan - not something that the Indians used to do. He had told the Indians to surround Custer and his men (a commonly used US tactic. In this case, the Indians had copied). There was also an unusually high number of Indians (between 2,000 and 4,000), whereas the Bureau of Indian Affairs had predicted only 800. Whilst respecting Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull, the Indians were (unusually) prepared to fight with high losses as the outcome with their new pitched-battle tactics. The US army had underestimated the Indians in this respect, and this is an important factor whilst considering responsibility of the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn. Therefore, in conclusion, I believe it is to be mostly General Custer's recklessness and his narcissistic, egotistic pride which blinded him into the battle. This linked in with the other factors I have mentioned (his subordinates, his superiors, and the Sioux for the aforementioned reasons) are what I believe to have caused the defeat of the US army at the Battle of Little Bighorn. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    The battle in Waschita 1868 was one of his best victories because he managed to kill the chief Black Kettle. After the war Custer's ego became to grow. He became an over confident, egotistic, flamboyant man. He was also a narcissist and loved himself- a lot.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat of the 7th Cavalry ...

    3 star(s)

    in late November. In 1876 Custer had a march testimony on Indian Service corruption which so infuriated President Ulysses S. Grant that he relieved Custer of his command and replaced him with General Alfred Terry, but because of 'popular disgust' Grant was forced to reverse his decision, Custer went west to meet his destiny.

  1. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    It is also a personality trait that played a large part in the loss at the Little Bighorn. Also Custer was extremely arrogant and didn't believe that anyone else's ideas and opinions could have any merit. This was again, obvious from his West Point report, and was evident in the loss at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

  2. Free essay

    Custers responsibilty for teh defeat at Little Bighorn

    120 warriors were killed and 20 civilians, but still this infuriated some humanists in the east. This shows that Custer is quite reckless as he allowed a lot of civilians die by not putting them in top priority but only victory against the Indians.

  1. The American West :General George Armstrong Custer 1839 – 1878

    He was a great tactician and very intelligent. Could an American General be mad? Possibly, but maybe Custer was so egocentric that he seemed to be a psycho. Although there is evidence that he was hard on his men in Sources F and K, "He was too hard on his men and horses".

  2. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    possibilities, however the source could just show Custer searching for sympathy and good luck from this former private. He enrolled in West Point immediately after he graduated, last in his class, showing that maybe he was not intelligent enough and didn't work hard enough to be put in command a few years later.

  1. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    Red Clouds power decreased and the Sioux now looked towards the more militant leaders such as Sitting Bull and Red Cloud. However there were worse times to come for the people of the Sioux. The Peace Treaty could not be maintained forever, could it?

  2. The battle of britain and the battle of the atlantic project.

    This meant fighter command could use planes efficiently and they could sleep between patrols. When a German attacked, it was detected the RAF planes and they would be directed straight to the target. Radar meant that RAF pilots were much faster and the whole of Britain could be covered with fewer planes than would be needed for constant patrols.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work