• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Custer to blame for the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn

Extracts from this document...


"Custer was to blame for the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn". How far do you agree, giving reasons and examples? Although it can be said that the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn is solely down to General Custer, I am of the distinct opinion that numerous different factors contributed to the aforementioned defeat. Firstly, there are many reasons why some historians believe Custer was responsible for the defeat. He disobeyed direct orders from superiors to wait for them before proceeding to attack. He was even told by Gibbon "Now, Custer, don't be greedy; wait for us". This further shows that he didn't have a lot of trust from the superiors as they felt it necessary to tell him this. As he rode away, he replied "No, I won't" - something that could be argued either way. Either he wouldn't be greedy, or he wouldn't wait. So, glory hunter Custer set off southwards to circle round the Wolf Mountains before proceeding northwards to the Indian camp where Gibbon and Terry would meet him. ...read more.


and tried to attacked overwhelming numbers of warriors without knowing the lie of the land. Subsequently, this may have been the fatal error losing the battle. However, the fault may have rested upon his subordinate officers, Reno and Benteen. They didn't try to force Custer to follow orders and wait for Gibbon and Terry as well as they could and should have done. They also didn't complain to Custer about his choice of splitting the army into even smaller divisions which weakened the army's performance as a whole. The fact remains that Reno could have gone to Custer's assistance whilst he was surrounded - Custer had sent a message requesting just that. Instead, he retreated across the river taking up a defensive position, he didn't go to Custer's aid, and moreover, he didn't 'press home' the attack. Custer's superiors, including Terry and Sheridan could also have been partly responsible for the battle being lost. ...read more.


Crazy Horse's battle tactics, for example, seemed to have followed a plan - not something that the Indians used to do. He had told the Indians to surround Custer and his men (a commonly used US tactic. In this case, the Indians had copied). There was also an unusually high number of Indians (between 2,000 and 4,000), whereas the Bureau of Indian Affairs had predicted only 800. Whilst respecting Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull, the Indians were (unusually) prepared to fight with high losses as the outcome with their new pitched-battle tactics. The US army had underestimated the Indians in this respect, and this is an important factor whilst considering responsibility of the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn. Therefore, in conclusion, I believe it is to be mostly General Custer's recklessness and his narcissistic, egotistic pride which blinded him into the battle. This linked in with the other factors I have mentioned (his subordinates, his superiors, and the Sioux for the aforementioned reasons) are what I believe to have caused the defeat of the US army at the Battle of Little Bighorn. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat of the 7th Cavalry ...

    3 star(s)

    or body to have a finger in the pie... and thereby lost his life' Captain Frederick Benteen Thousands of Lakota, Cheyenne and Arapho warriors forced Custer's unit back onto a long, dusty ridge parallel to the Little Bighorn, they had a major advantage in numbers (about 2000 to 600)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    The battle in Waschita 1868 was one of his best victories because he managed to kill the chief Black Kettle. After the war Custer's ego became to grow. He became an over confident, egotistic, flamboyant man. He was also a narcissist and loved himself- a lot.

  1. Free essay

    Custers responsibilty for teh defeat at Little Bighorn

    120 warriors were killed and 20 civilians, but still this infuriated some humanists in the east. This shows that Custer is quite reckless as he allowed a lot of civilians die by not putting them in top priority but only victory against the Indians.

  2. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    It is also a personality trait that played a large part in the loss at the Little Bighorn. Also Custer was extremely arrogant and didn't believe that anyone else's ideas and opinions could have any merit. This was again, obvious from his West Point report, and was evident in the loss at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

  1. The American West :General George Armstrong Custer 1839 – 1878

    It was also reported that he has an Indian wife, and if so shows that that is definitely not true. He did massacre thousands of Indians though, but I do not think that it was out of hate. It was his job - he had to kill them.

  2. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    Red Clouds power decreased and the Sioux now looked towards the more militant leaders such as Sitting Bull and Red Cloud. However there were worse times to come for the people of the Sioux. The Peace Treaty could not be maintained forever, could it?

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    This quote is a negative aspect of Custer but he is trying to justify it by suggesting that he rubs against the hair but only because he can't do otherwise. So the wrong decisions in his life maybe explained by this long-term cause of not being able to find other

  2. The battle of britain and the battle of the atlantic project.

    In June 1940 Hitler was not thinking about the invasion. The Navy and Army plans were different. Orders for Operation Sealion were not given till 6th July. These factors meant that Britain could get ready for attacks and build more aircraft.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work