• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

Extracts from this document...


Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster? September 4th 1939, Germany invaded Poland and refused to leave, in return Britain declared war. For the next six months Hitler did nothing, tricking Churchill into thinking he was satisfied with his regained land naming it a 'Phoney War'. April 1940, the end of the Phoney War. Hitler attacked Norway and Denmark and by the end of May Hitler had invaded Holland as well as Belgium! Churchill realised this anti-clockwise pattern and new that France was next. He decided to send in the British Expeditionary Force and promised to defend the country from invasion. June 1940, Germany won their attack. The soldiers fled to Dunkirk and 328,000 men out of 400,000 were saved, but was this really a Miracle or a Disaster? After World War I, the Maginot Line was built on the French and German border in hope of preventing further attack. The British thought Germany would attack through Belgium using Blitzkrieg, so placed the BEF along the border. To their amazement, the Germans had a surprise attack through the Ardennes. France didn't expect this as the Ardennes has dense forestry and is mountainous so the idea of Blitzkrieg was seen as impossible because German tanks wouldn't be able to transport through. Germany trapped the BEF in a pincer movement and the only place to go was the coast. ...read more.


The whole idea of newspapers was propaganda and Churchill was the King of it. He only told his people what he thought they wanted to hear. This leads onto the next source. Source 6 is a cartoon by British Artist David Low. It's a primary piece of evidence as it was published in the London newspaper, 'The evening Standard' 8th June 1940. He's named the painting 'to fight another day'. The painting shows boats of different sizes carrying soldiers to safety while gunfire spray the water from German planes. Even though some people saw Dunkirk as a Miracle, many people thought of it as a Disaster. Italy was yet to choose a side of the war, after Dunkirk they decided to join with Germany. An Italian cartoonist published a cartoon showing the Great British Lion being chased out of France retreating to Britain. It's a primary source, published a short while after Dunkirk which is good reason to call it reliable, but it can also be classed as non-reliable because it is an Italians point of view of how Germany looked the stronger side. The cartoon is valid as it shows that Germany won Britain as they ran away and Hitler regained land. There are many reasons why Dunkirk is seen as a disaster. Source 8 is a school History textbook on Global War by Josh Brooman, 1999. ...read more.


Whilst Hitler on the other hand had new technology, well equipped, trained soldiers who knew what they were doing. Britain could be compared as shambles to Germany's response to Dunkirk. I think Dunkirk is mainly a disaster because Britain failed their mission to protect France from Hitler's army attacking. Also, Britain lost huge amounts of money due to machinery such as vehicles and guns was destroyed or abandoned and even though morale was on a high in Britain the soldiers who had witnessed this event felt ashamed of running away like cowards. I think it was stupid of Churchill to send untrained soldiers to France on a very important mission, this shows how very little organisation there was. Also, Italy had seen this as a failure to Britain and looked at Germany as the stronger country and joined their side, as well as France just taken over leaving Britain alone. Dunkirk did also have upsides; it was a miracle how many people were actually saved and how British fishermen were prepared to sacrifice their lives to help save the soldiers. America also agreed that it was a miracle as they were stunned how many were rescued and unharmed. I think the British people's thoughts of Dunkirk were only a miracle as they were lead wrongly by the press and propaganda. They were told only good points about operation Dynamo and Dunkirk to keep morale up and not for people to doubt Churchill. So in conclusion, Dunkirk was a short-term disaster but a long-term defeat, (1605 words not including quotes.) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk: Miracle or Disaster?

    The beaches were highly dangerous and under enemy fire. It became necessary to evacuate men from nearby beaches - something that was thought to be an almost impossible task because of shallow water. At this point on June 1st, the "little ships" began their part in Operation Dynamo and assisted the procedure triumphantly.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    large a part that the people of England felt it to be also a family affair in which they were involved'. This united the nation bringing renewed enthusiasm for the war effort which helped Britain win the war. I feel the source could be viewed as reliable as the author

  1. womens crsk history

    Source F is useful to us as evidence for the contribution of women to the war effort as it is a poster produced in 1916, the year of conscription. The poster is showing us how women got were getting themselves involved in the war, particularly munitions.

  2. Modern history

    This once again highlighted women could be organised and make decisions for the benefit of the society. During the Great War, all militant activity ceased instantly when the war began in 1914. Women were determined to prove themselves to be fit physically and mentally in a state of war.

  1. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    During the attacks he says many soldiers had died, this shows a loss of life and the disorderly panic of soldiers. This source links in with sources 7 and 8, which both states that the soldiers were lined up and down the beach, this makes the source seem more reliable.

  2. How successful was Dunkirk

    I also know from my own knowledge that small boats occupied masses of troops well beyond their limits and as a result became extremely overcrowded and in some cases caused boats to capsize making this source more useful. Another source which supports this particular aspect of defeat is a source written by a German fighter pilot's account of Dunkirk.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    Overall source B10 opposes to the interpretation of the Battle of Dunkirk because it shows negative information. On the other hand it can also be criticised due to the source being biased. Source B16 is primary source propaganda broadcast which was broadcasted in June 1940 by a traitor of Britain.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    The data includes the amount of British casualties (over 68,000 men were killed, captured, wounded or missing), equipment that they had lost (2,500 anti-aircraft and field gun, 11,000 machine guns, 75,000 vehicles (including tanks), total number of troops that were evacuated (338,226), and the total number evacuated by civilian (not army)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work