• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Was Dunkirk a triumph? There are different interpretations as to whether Dunkirk was a triumph of a defeat. Following the first world war Europe experienced 15 years of peace since the end of the Great War, the time the Hitler ignored the Treaty of Versailles and started to invade countries in Europe including Rhineland Austria and Poland. It was when Germany invaded poland that the British Prime Minister Neville chamberlain declared war on the 3rd of September 1939 Britain were prepared at home by issuing gas masks, food and evacuating kids from the cities to the countryside. At the same time Hitler was quickly taking over europe due to his tactics which was the ?blitzkrieg? the war was going really badly for Britain which led to chamberlain being replaced by Winston Churchill. French people were also beginning to evacuate. Was it really a success? To find out whether it was a triumph or a defeat 8 sources will be evaluated looking at the reliability and usefulness of different interpretation. British troops were stuck at Dunkirk in between the German army who were advancing. The army could be wiped out however in total 340 000 were rescued and 68 000 were either dead or missing yet it still has been viewed as a triumph.Operation dynamo was starting to evacuate the troops, the evacuation took 9 days and pleasure boats, destroyers and crafts were used however a lot of vehicles were abandoned. ...read more.


This source was written on the front page of the British newspaper, the daily express, 31st may 1940. Which makes this source not as valid as something that was written in 2003, so in conclusion the source doesn?t have the reliability as something else because it isn?t 100% accurate because some things could be made up for not accurate. The fact that this was written by a British newspaper could mean that it is slightly biased because British people want other citizens to think that they had won the war and make the country look good so they must have just written a few white lies. It is also one sided which makes it biased. The last source that supports Dunkirk was a triumph was source B7, which was written after Winston Churchill was speaking to parliament on June 4th 1940. This source in my opinion isn?t reliable because as soon as i see the date it was written it changes my mind because back then everything wasn?t confirmed and most of the news were lies, and to make it worse it was said by the British prime minister, this is because prime ministers would be upset even if they lost they would have to support their country no matter what so the prime minister said that it was a ?miracle? which was biased because it wasn?t. ...read more.


This means that I have found the second understanding more convincing that Dunkirk was a defeat rather than a victory. This is due to the evidence of the following sources; B9, B13, B10 and B16. Its strengths include more primary sources then the triumphs, which mean less benefit to hindsight to alter opinions. The two most important sources out of the 16 listed, positive and negative is B9, which is the historian GCSE text book, which could reach a balanced judgment and B3. Source B3 it is also a GCSE text book which shows facts and figures and is very limited to opinions, but is entitled to people who are paid to write about history which is somewhat reliable. The weakest sources from both positive and negative listed is B16, a source which is very biased, based on a traitor who wanted to undermine the British?s confidence making it less reliable. The other weakest source is B5, a newspaper article which has been censored by the government and is only allowed to publish positive information, making it also biased like source B16 and less reliable. However, my conclusion is balanced because I have analysed all 16 sources. Eight negative and eight positive. I cross-referenced the sources, compared which is more reliable, primary or secondary sources? I reached a balanced judgement after outweighing the positive with the negatives, the reliable from the unreliable. The Battle of Dunkirk was a defeat. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    advantage of hindsight, he also had all the facts available to him and it was not affected by propaganda. I feel this source is reliable. These sources agree with the view that Dunkirk was a military victory. Historians believe Dunkirk was a military victory purely to do with the fact

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    the source in ,'and naval officers using their revolvers' illustrating a scene of total chaos and panic, even amongst the officers. The information seems reliable as the account is primary and first hand and although from a British author doesn't seem biased.

  1. Dunkirk: Miracle or Disaster?

    British behaviour towards the French was also despicable considering French soldiers were holding the perimeter around Dunkirk. Lord Gort the Commander in Chief of the BEF was instructed not to inform his French colleagues that the evacuation was beginning south east of Dunkirk.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    these important breakthroughs then I think that the stalemate would have had gone on for a much longer time, even with the arrival of the Americans. The war at sea affected the Western Front greatly because if it had not been for the blockade then the Germans would have had

  1. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    The biggest defeat for the British according to the Germans was that even though many soldiers were saved a vast majority of them couldn't escape the Germans grip. Many of them lost their lives, and some of the survivors were taken captive.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    heavy equipment, 600 tanks were lost, more than 1000 filed guns, 850 anti-tank guns and a large number of lorries cars and motorbikes were left in France. This just shows me how much machinery was actually lost, and that Britain's factory workers had to work hard to replace the amount of equipment lost in Dunkirk.

  1. Analysis of different sources of information about Dunkirk.

    The source tells us the evacuation was a disaster but a propaganda victory. Source F was written in 2003, so Jackson had time to analyse the information and it was written in hindsight. Therefore he has a clear overview of the evacuation, has access to extra information that would have

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    what they had accomplished for their country and to keep their morale high. However, this has limitations as it does not mention any negatives, it is one-sided and censorship has been used. Following my analysis of the sources, the evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great disaster for Britain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work