• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme

Extracts from this document...


Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme? In order to answer the main essay question on whether or not Field Marshall Haig was the Butcher of the Somme I will include points for and against and also quotes to sum up and give a complete answer on my opinion of Field Marshall Haig. When field Marshall Haig was appointed commander of the British forces, he was 54 years old. Before this time Haig had had a long and successful career in the military and 15 years previous he had been a celebrated Calvary commander in the Boer war. Haig believed that the only way you could win a battle was through "...grit, determination...morale..." Even though hundreds and thousands of men had been killed, in December 1915, the western front was still stalemate. It was debated as to how well the British army was being led and in the same month, a new commander was appointed, General Haig. However experienced Haig was, he now encountered an even worse and more complex problem - trench warfare. Since generals had no idea of how to fight against trench warfare they simply used methods of fighting and tactics that they had used in past wars. ...read more.


However, they were too frightened to say anything because if they were to criticize the commanders then they would simply be shot too death by them. Only a few exceedingly brave soldiers wrote about how much they opposed of Haig's ideas and seeing as their letters were screened and read by others they risked their lives in doing so. On the other hand, many of the soldiers were very new and had very little experience so they would have probably just thought that that was the 'done' thing, however bizarre it seemed. As with the soldiers, I believe there were mixed feelings about Haig and the Battle of the Somme back in Britain. This, I assume, was because many had no idea about what the war was like or the terrible ordeals that the men went through, let alone the amount of deaths or the horrifying conditions they had to live in. Nevertheless, when the first movie about the war came out showing actual footage, many controversial issues occurred, mainly critical of Haig. For example, in Source E, in this section of the poem by Siegfried Sassoon you learn how the people at home understood the terrible condition that troops were in and that nobody ...read more.


In conclusion to this essay 'Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme?' I believe, that overall, in effect, he was. Although there are many pieces of evidence that suggest otherwise, there are also more damning quotes to suggest that he was. I believe my main point for this is that the majority of the soldiers were new and had absolutely no idea about the state of affairs they were going to go through, nor were they trained for an event this intense. After Haig had been in many wars and fought for most of his life I believe that the amount of training he gave the troops was poor and inadequate for a man of his experience. The men were simply led on false pretences and made to believe that the war wasn't going to be that bad, whereas if Haig had made it worse than he knew it was going to be then they would have displayed better fighting qualities and would have been fully prepared. Another focal point that suggests against Haig; is that even when it was clear that his plan wasn't working he stuck to it and didn't think about trying to change his ideas to suit the new type of trench warfare. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    David Evans is obviously highly critical of Haig's decision to use the tank in the Battle of the Somme. He holds the view that not only did Haig use the tanks before they had even been properly tested in battle, but 'only fifty' implies that he thinks that the number

  2. was haig butcher of the somme

    Liddell Hart, Reputations (1928) General Douglas Haig, battle orders issued just before the Battle of the Somme (May 1916) The First, Second, and Third Armies will take steps to deceive the enemy as to the real front of attack, to wear him out, and reduce his fighting efficiency both during the three days prior to the assault and during the subsequent operations.

  1. Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme?

    Some of his battle strategies, in fact, fit the dictionary definition of butcher exactly, for instance the fact that he sent hundreds of men out each day replacing those who had just died, which is an example of killing indiscriminately (or at random, wildly).

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    Also, Coppard has had time to think about the war which he was in and come up with his firm opinion of the whole war not just the first day, though this may be a disadvantage as Coppard may have other people's opinions of the war in his view now.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    Lord Kitchener said, "I don't know what is to be done. This isn't war." The new weapons of the war were not very good at braking the stalemate they made it easier to defend than attack. Mud and barbed wire made the common cavalry charges and the infantry 'going over

  2. Haig Fully Deserves His Reputation as 'Bungler and Butcher of the Somme.'Discuss

    This source suggests that Haig is a butcher and a bungler. He is a butcher as the source suggests that he still sent men to their deaths knowing that there wasn't a realistic chance of a breakthrough. It suggests that he was a bungler as he used a terrible strategy.

  1. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    You are then informed that he has been killed in action. After the war, you find out that he was killed in a raiding party, all to raise the morale slightly of men on the front line. You think to yourself...'oh, won't they be happy!

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    They say that in all ninety-seven German divisions were drawn into the fighting, and it was during the Somme that "what still remained of the first class peace trained German infantry was expended on the battlefield." What they fail to acknowledge was the fact that exactly the same thing was happening to the British soldiers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work