• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Germany treated fairly by the treaty of Versailles 1919?

Extracts from this document...


Hassan Alomari Was Germany treated fairly by the treaty of Versailles 1919? I will be discussing whether the treaty of Versailles was fair on Germany. I will make my final decision on how fair it was by looking at the good and bad things. The positive things and the negative things. I will be weighing up these things to come to my decision. The Treaty of Versailles Three men made the treaty, David Lloyd George representing Great Britain, Georges Clemenceau representing France and Woodrow Wilson representing the U.S.A. It was made to bring peace back into Europe and make sure there wasn't another war. I think it was unfair that Germany could not have a representative who would fight for them and try and convince the three men not to be so harsh on them. They were not allowed to have any body there because they decided that the Germany should take the blame for starting the war. ...read more.


Germany would lose most of its money and might go broke. This will have an affect on the food and money spent on health. Germany also had to accept the blame for starting the war. In the long run, Germans would have to live with the fact that people think they were responsible for the war. They will be mocked and disgraced for it. Military On the military side of things, the German army was reduced to only 100,000 men. This would mean that if someone were to attack them, they wouldn't be able to defend themselves. The navy was also reduced to only 6 battleships and no submarines, meaning they can't defend well. No German troops were allowed on the Rhineland. This was the part of land that separated Germany and France. This will not affect Germany that much because they weren't allowed to attack France anyway. ...read more.


All of Germany's battleships being taken away and only having 6 left and no submarines meant that they couldn't do anything out at sea. The things that were fair on Germany were that they were not allowed to unite with Austria because they would only want to do that to start up an army. A german troop not allowed into the Rhineland was fair because they would have no need to go there. Alsace-Lorraine being given back to France would just have taken Germany's moral down because they won it fairly but didn't affect them much. After seeing what was fair and what was harsh I think that the treaty was too harsh on Germany because they lost a lot of money, which will lead to a lower standard of living and would kill a lot of poor Germans. Germany's army and navy being reduced to a stupid number meant they can't defend themselves and can easily be attacked or taken advantage of. Germany was made into a helpless country that had to accept that they started the war. I think they were treated way to harshly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

    had over 6 million men now has 100,000 to defend its borders in an event of an attack. The allies now feel more secure that Germany is no longer an aggressive nation and can easily be defeated if another war broke out.


    Ruhr to force Germany to pay up: as well as causing chaos at the same time.

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    place where we slept, and buried my burning head in the blankets and pillows." (Stewart p.31). On returning unemployed to Munich, Hitler was outraged exclaiming " in these days the hatred grew in me, hatred for those responsible for this deed."

  2. Versailles and Hyperinflation, Germany 1919-28.

    By 1928, the German political situation was fairly stable, although not completely. The main reason for Germany managing to stabilise herself was Gustav Stresemann. Stresemann became chancellor briefly in September 1923 and remained Foreign Minister until his death in October 1929.

  1. Has to much emphasis been placed on the negative aspects of pre-1914 Germany?

    The formation of the Agrarian league fostered nationalism, which had been the basis of Sammlungspolitik. The combining of a national policy with the view of Germany as a nation is quite accurate. Weltpolitik can be seen as structurally connected to Sammlungspolitik.

  2. Was the ‘Liberal Internationalism’ espoused in 1919 destined to fail or merely a concept ...

    The Treaty of Versailles must therefore be analysed in depth as it is one of the, if not the main documentation outlining the ideas for this new concept of liberal internationalism. Lipmann said that the Treaty of Versailles was a play-off between 'Reaction, Reconstruction and Revolution'4, referring to the stances

  1. Treaty of Versailles, was it fair?

    of the war to Britain and especially France (over 36,000 million pounds). They had no choice but to sign as they had lost the war and the Allies threatened to invade Berlin. Germany sworn her vengeance for the shame of the treaty of 1919 and was the treaty fair?

  2. The Treaty of Versailles : How Did It Affect Germany?

    France and George Clemanceau wanted a harsh peace both economically and militarily to ruin Germany so that she would never be able to retaliate back and cause another war, or threaten French frontiers. The Americans led by the idealistic President Woodrow Wilson wanted a fair and extremely lenient peace in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work