• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Germany treated fairly by the treaty of Versailles 1919?

Extracts from this document...


Hassan Alomari Was Germany treated fairly by the treaty of Versailles 1919? I will be discussing whether the treaty of Versailles was fair on Germany. I will make my final decision on how fair it was by looking at the good and bad things. The positive things and the negative things. I will be weighing up these things to come to my decision. The Treaty of Versailles Three men made the treaty, David Lloyd George representing Great Britain, Georges Clemenceau representing France and Woodrow Wilson representing the U.S.A. It was made to bring peace back into Europe and make sure there wasn't another war. I think it was unfair that Germany could not have a representative who would fight for them and try and convince the three men not to be so harsh on them. They were not allowed to have any body there because they decided that the Germany should take the blame for starting the war. ...read more.


Germany would lose most of its money and might go broke. This will have an affect on the food and money spent on health. Germany also had to accept the blame for starting the war. In the long run, Germans would have to live with the fact that people think they were responsible for the war. They will be mocked and disgraced for it. Military On the military side of things, the German army was reduced to only 100,000 men. This would mean that if someone were to attack them, they wouldn't be able to defend themselves. The navy was also reduced to only 6 battleships and no submarines, meaning they can't defend well. No German troops were allowed on the Rhineland. This was the part of land that separated Germany and France. This will not affect Germany that much because they weren't allowed to attack France anyway. ...read more.


All of Germany's battleships being taken away and only having 6 left and no submarines meant that they couldn't do anything out at sea. The things that were fair on Germany were that they were not allowed to unite with Austria because they would only want to do that to start up an army. A german troop not allowed into the Rhineland was fair because they would have no need to go there. Alsace-Lorraine being given back to France would just have taken Germany's moral down because they won it fairly but didn't affect them much. After seeing what was fair and what was harsh I think that the treaty was too harsh on Germany because they lost a lot of money, which will lead to a lower standard of living and would kill a lot of poor Germans. Germany's army and navy being reduced to a stupid number meant they can't defend themselves and can easily be attacked or taken advantage of. Germany was made into a helpless country that had to accept that they started the war. I think they were treated way to harshly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Although this was small party, in a few years it becomes the most powerful political group in Europe. When a member, Hitler became very busy, spending all his free time doing work for the party, forcing him to resign from his military position.

  2. How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

    In my opinion it would have been better for Germany if it had some colonies to help some more income, to help pay off the war debt. As a result of the territorial changes Germany lost 13.5% of her land and 12.5% of her population.


    They argued that countries had also been aggressively concocting war plans leading up to 1914. On the other hand, the victors retorted that in the very beginning of any confliction internationally (the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Austria) Germany showed blatant support for Austria-Hungary if it were to declare war on Serbia.

  2. Treaty of Versailles, was it fair?

    and loosing it. That is something they had to accept. I also think that their talk about their great territory loss of 13% (including 10% of her population, 14% of her farmland and 75% of her iron ore resources) was their way to say something against the treaty and not

  1. Has to much emphasis been placed on the negative aspects of pre-1914 Germany?

    Weltpolitik can be seen as structurally connected to Sammlungspolitik. Protectionist interests, which were the foremost interests of the agricultural and industrial communities, fostered a pride in home produce, and with the introduction of Protectionist measures and the subsequent imposition of high import Tariffs in 1902, Germany was allowed to pursue aggressive national interests.

  2. The Treaty of Versailles : How Did It Affect Germany?

    France and George Clemanceau wanted a harsh peace both economically and militarily to ruin Germany so that she would never be able to retaliate back and cause another war, or threaten French frontiers. The Americans led by the idealistic President Woodrow Wilson wanted a fair and extremely lenient peace in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work