• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Haig 'A Butcher'?

Extracts from this document...


Was Haig 'A Butcher'? The Battle of the Somme was planned as a joint French and British operation. The idea originally came from the French Commander-in-Chief, Joseph Joffre and was accepted by General Sir Douglas Haig, the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) commander, despite his preference for a large attack in Flanders. Haig also wanted to make a breakthrough and show that he would help takeover Germany with France. At first Joffre intended for to use mainly French soldiers but the German attack on Verdun in February 1916 turned the Somme offensive into a large-scale British diversionary attack. General Sir Douglas Haig now took over responsibility for the operation and with the help of General Sir Henry Rawlinson, came up with his own plan of attack. Haig's strategy was for an eight-day preliminary bombardment that he believed would completely destroy the German forward defences. Since 1918 there has been furious arguments over the leadership of General Haig, an army general in the First World War. After the war the British Government praised and showered Haig with honours. They also awarded him with �100,000. However not long after the war ended, Haig started to be criticized on his tactics, his willingness to sustain a great number of casualties and a number of other reasons. ...read more.


Even though Haig had experience of battle on the front line, most of these experiences were hand to hand combat, fighting small skirmishes in India and fighting against guerrilla warfare in South Africa. He had no experiences of large military confrontation in traditional battle formation or with the new machines or techniques of the twentieth century war methods. So to call up a general who had no experience of these things was a very risky idea. Haig thought that killing more Germans even at the cost of a large potion of the British Empire soldiers would win the war. Haig lived in luxury, forty miles away from the front line and never visited soldiers at the front. Hence he did not know the conditions they were subjected to. Haig should have ensured efficient communication in planning the strategies for the battle. Another weakness he had was, when confronted with problems Haig would step back and let other people handle it. Haig and his generals used the same strategy continually. They also used all their artillery to destroy the barbed wire while killing Germans at the same time. But this was not successful. In fact, it made it worst. ...read more.


Haig was not used to modern warfare as his experiences of wars in other countries were completely different from the traditional formation in Europe. We should also take in consideration that in the Battle of the Somme Britain suffered heavy losses but Germany had the most casualties. Also people who classify Haig as a butcher often say that Haig didn't care for anyone and he said, "the nation must be taught to bear losses" but I think that at the time of the war this is a true considerable statement to say although it is hard to face facts, because if you want to win a war there is going to be losses unfortunately. Although I am making it seem that I am on Haig's side completely I still think Haig should have got more involved in the battle but I think that his battle tactics were okay, maybe only a little improving needed due to the fact that Germany had more casualties at the end of the Somme. Haig was a considerable general for example he said," success in battle depends mainly on morale and determination." Overall I think that Sir Douglas Haig was not a butcher and should not be classified as a butcher. I think this is a very important issue and I found the information very interesting while I was researching the answers to this question. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    by sympathising with Haig's mindset, quoting Haig in saying that 'it would be folly not to use any means at my [his] disposal', opposing source 6. Also, it has been said that '7 would have given the edge'. At the time, the French were having considerable trouble holding at Verdun

  2. Explain how well Haigs background and military experience had prepared him for command of ...

    He just was to proud to admit he was wrong, and would rather ignore others opinions. Defenders of Haig argue that he had few options and had himself been ordered to launch the offensive to let the French recover at Verdun, where there was heavy fighting.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Those men lost for the Russians could have spent the time fighting somewhere else, e.g., the Western Front. All the Russians did was cost the Allies time, men and much needed resources. However, on the other hand you could argue that if it had been for the Russians fighting early

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    During the first day of the Somme, General Rawlinson had so little faith in the infantry that he ordered them to walk across no-mans-land towards the German trenches. Although this cannot be blamed on Haig, many people believe that it was decisions like this that cost Haig so many thousands of men.

  1. General Haig

    It shows us this by General Haig pointing at himself and using the phrase 'like a hole in the head - which is what most of you are going to get' showing that the person who drew this poster believes that if you joined General Haig you will almost certainly die.

  2. Was Haig the butcher of the Somme?

    A letter from a lieutenant just before his death describes thoroughly, ''My tunic is rotten with other men's blood and partly spattered with a friends brains, it is horrible, but why should you people at home not know?'' (This shows that the soldiers wanted people to know what they were going through)

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    Source H, refers to Haig as 'one of the main architects of the allied victory' which connects to source G claim that the 'Somme had no great importance in the strategic sense; its consequences nevertheless were great, particularly as regards to moral.

  2. Haig: Butcher or Serious Commander?

    He was also able to include high quality maps of the battlefield, which would have been unavailable to the Daily Express in July 1916. Source E is therefore by far the more reliable of the two accounts. It is succint and places 1 July 1916 in perspective.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work