• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Was Haig the butcher of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 3 Was Haig the butcher of the Somme? In 1915 the war didn't make any progress, each side had made hundreds of attacks and thousands of soldiers had been killed. The British thought about how their countries soldiers were being led into battle, so in 1915 December the 10th a new commander of the British forces was appointed 54 year old man named Field Marshall Haig. He had a good successful career. He had been in the boar war, where the British had been poorly equipped. As Haig wasn't so used to the new age of fighting. He had some difficulty adjusting to it. With each side in trenches and people not used to trench warfare, no one knew had to cope with them, or win a war like this. So all the others went back on the idea of designing battle plans with trenches. They were going to fight a war of attrition and wear the enemy out. February 1916 Germany set out for another attack. They sent soldiers to attack the French forts in and around the town of Verdun, they sent thousands again and again. ...read more.

Middle

From what source 3 shows it makes out that Haig showed so much ignorance for the mistakes and the unexpected loss of soldiers that were made on the first day of battle. If there were at least 60,000 British dead and many German prisoners were taken and 1 Canadian battalion lost, 700 out of 850 men, then where is the progress in that, as stated in source 3, Haig attacked, the first day on the 1st of July 1916, ''Very successful attack this morning... All went like clockwork...The battle is going very well for us already, the Germans are surrendering freely. The enemy is so short of men that I am collecting them from all parts of the line. Our troops are in wonderful spirits and full of confidence.'' This shows the ignorance of Haig in the fact of death, losing and the suffering of the soldiers. How can you rely on Haig's suggestions and views on the war, when he wasn't even on the front line. The more reliable sources, are the sources that come from the soldiers. Which are like the sources, 5+6, The letter in source 7 describes how a captain's friend had to write a letter to the captain's sister, which described his death, which he states to be a quick and painless death. ...read more.

Conclusion

Livesey's book is about the war and this may look like Livesey is only viewing Haig for his topics and of how he felt about what he did. Each book dates, 1989 and the other 1991, these years are very close so they may have used the same books. Neither of them would have fought in the war. These sources give an impression that the books were meant for adult reading so the audience would have been the same. Like from Livesey's source, ''Perhaps his greatest failing was his constant often-misplaced optimism...'' And Warner's source is similar in language. The thoughts and views of Haigs titled depends on the opinions of who's reading. Depending if the person is rich or poor. The only information we get is from Liveseys book, which is about battles, death, blood and murder of the troops. Warner's book is about his family's sympathy. Together they are both balanced views. The fact is that there is no answer to ''Was Haig the butcher of the Somme'' because it depends on who is reading it, what your own personal issues are, experiences. People's opinions on what the people in command should have done. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    The Battle of Cambrai was notable for the success with which the British employed tanks. On November 20, 1917, about 400 British tanks, supported by infantry moved forward into the German lines, achieving an advance of 8 kilometres. In a sweepingly successful start to the battle, 12 miles of the

  2. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    They could not think of any other form of warfare, except to throw into battle large numbers of men month after month'. Despite what it seems today, Haig's decisions were not as disastrous as we might have thought. His tactics were in line with current warfare techniques of the time, and he had no experience when dealing with machine guns.

  1. Explain how well Haigs background and military experience had prepared him for command of ...

    Haig started the war commanding the commander 1 corps through large battles such as Mons, the Aisne and First Ypres, and then in 1915 he led the important first army before assuming his role as commander in chief of the British army in 1915.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Then came Ludendorff's massive offensive, which pushed the Allies back forty miles. This may seem like a failure but it is not because the Germans advanced too far too quickly and there were one million German casualties and not many allied casualties.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Whatever the case, "the only consequence of the commander-in-chief's determination on a hasty sequel to Messines was no action whatever." Haig's next important mistake is said to be the artillery bombardment of the German trenches.

  2. General Haig

    why Haig would continue the attacking in places like Somme to end the war. Overall it is giving both sides of the argument and gives the point of view from a modern historian. This source therefore does and does not support Keegan's interpretation of Haig.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    continue in the war, it boosted Churchill's leadership and it caused the Germans to have to fight a two fronted war. Source 22 by Norman Gelb an American historian says 'Dunkirk was the beginning of the end for the Third Reich'.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    Also, Coppard has had time to think about the war which he was in and come up with his firm opinion of the whole war not just the first day, though this may be a disadvantage as Coppard may have other people's opinions of the war in his view now.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work