• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Was Haig the butcher of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 3 Was Haig the butcher of the Somme? In 1915 the war didn't make any progress, each side had made hundreds of attacks and thousands of soldiers had been killed. The British thought about how their countries soldiers were being led into battle, so in 1915 December the 10th a new commander of the British forces was appointed 54 year old man named Field Marshall Haig. He had a good successful career. He had been in the boar war, where the British had been poorly equipped. As Haig wasn't so used to the new age of fighting. He had some difficulty adjusting to it. With each side in trenches and people not used to trench warfare, no one knew had to cope with them, or win a war like this. So all the others went back on the idea of designing battle plans with trenches. They were going to fight a war of attrition and wear the enemy out. February 1916 Germany set out for another attack. They sent soldiers to attack the French forts in and around the town of Verdun, they sent thousands again and again. ...read more.

Middle

From what source 3 shows it makes out that Haig showed so much ignorance for the mistakes and the unexpected loss of soldiers that were made on the first day of battle. If there were at least 60,000 British dead and many German prisoners were taken and 1 Canadian battalion lost, 700 out of 850 men, then where is the progress in that, as stated in source 3, Haig attacked, the first day on the 1st of July 1916, ''Very successful attack this morning... All went like clockwork...The battle is going very well for us already, the Germans are surrendering freely. The enemy is so short of men that I am collecting them from all parts of the line. Our troops are in wonderful spirits and full of confidence.'' This shows the ignorance of Haig in the fact of death, losing and the suffering of the soldiers. How can you rely on Haig's suggestions and views on the war, when he wasn't even on the front line. The more reliable sources, are the sources that come from the soldiers. Which are like the sources, 5+6, The letter in source 7 describes how a captain's friend had to write a letter to the captain's sister, which described his death, which he states to be a quick and painless death. ...read more.

Conclusion

Livesey's book is about the war and this may look like Livesey is only viewing Haig for his topics and of how he felt about what he did. Each book dates, 1989 and the other 1991, these years are very close so they may have used the same books. Neither of them would have fought in the war. These sources give an impression that the books were meant for adult reading so the audience would have been the same. Like from Livesey's source, ''Perhaps his greatest failing was his constant often-misplaced optimism...'' And Warner's source is similar in language. The thoughts and views of Haigs titled depends on the opinions of who's reading. Depending if the person is rich or poor. The only information we get is from Liveseys book, which is about battles, death, blood and murder of the troops. Warner's book is about his family's sympathy. Together they are both balanced views. The fact is that there is no answer to ''Was Haig the butcher of the Somme'' because it depends on who is reading it, what your own personal issues are, experiences. People's opinions on what the people in command should have done. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    The Battle of Cambrai was notable for the success with which the British employed tanks. On November 20, 1917, about 400 British tanks, supported by infantry moved forward into the German lines, achieving an advance of 8 kilometres. In a sweepingly successful start to the battle, 12 miles of the

  2. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    He couldn't see the whole battle like we can today in a complete overview. Conclusion As an overview, Haig was a ruthless General in charge of people's lives, with the attitude that the death of 60,000 men on the first day was a worthy sacrifice.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    As a result of these offensives, Ludendorff requested his government to seek an armistice with the Allies. The German government initiated armistice talks (October) with the Allies, but they failed when President Wilson insisted on negotiating only with democratic governments.

  2. Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme

    Winston Churchill wrote in a personal memoir of his just this. [Source F]. As did Lord Lansdowne, except the only difference was that Lord Lansdowne took the bravery to be the first politician too publicly question the way the war was being fought.

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    The extract says 'I want you to understand that there is a difference between rehearsal and the real thing... the absence of the enemy ... and the absence of the General. The cartoon emphasises the absences of General Haig in the Battle of Somme.

  2. Field Marshall Haig "The butcher of the Somme"? - source related study

    I believe Sources I and J differ about the Battle of the Somme because despite both sources being written by David Lloyd George each source is written under different circumstances because source I was written while David Lloyd George was in office meaning he could not express his own views

  1. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    The negative views on General Haig were not only held by people in the home front. Fred Pearson, a private on the Western Front, commented on Haig in a local newspaper in 1966. He stated that Haig was 'the biggest murderer of lot'.

  2. was haig butcher of the somme

    He focused on the right by pushing forward there. * 15th September-Tanks Haig unleashed tanks for the first time. * Too few to have a big effect * 36 out of 49 arrived at the starting point * They were slow and unreliable * However tanks were alarming to Germans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work