Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
    • View my saved documents

    Was Haig the butcher of the Somme?

    Extracts from this document...

    Introduction

    Question 3 Was Haig the butcher of the Somme? In 1915 the war didn't make any progress, each side had made hundreds of attacks and thousands of soldiers had been killed. The British thought about how their countries soldiers were being led into battle, so in 1915 December the 10th a new commander of the British forces was appointed 54 year old man named Field Marshall Haig. He had a good successful career. He had been in the boar war, where the British had been poorly equipped. As Haig wasn't so used to the new age of fighting. He had some difficulty adjusting to it. With each side in trenches and people not used to trench warfare, no one knew had to cope with them, or win a war like this. So all the others went back on the idea of designing battle plans with trenches. They were going to fight a war of attrition and wear the enemy out. February 1916 Germany set out for another attack. They sent soldiers to attack the French forts in and around the town of Verdun, they sent thousands again and again. ...read more.

    Middle

    From what source 3 shows it makes out that Haig showed so much ignorance for the mistakes and the unexpected loss of soldiers that were made on the first day of battle. If there were at least 60,000 British dead and many German prisoners were taken and 1 Canadian battalion lost, 700 out of 850 men, then where is the progress in that, as stated in source 3, Haig attacked, the first day on the 1st of July 1916, ''Very successful attack this morning... All went like clockwork...The battle is going very well for us already, the Germans are surrendering freely. The enemy is so short of men that I am collecting them from all parts of the line. Our troops are in wonderful spirits and full of confidence.'' This shows the ignorance of Haig in the fact of death, losing and the suffering of the soldiers. How can you rely on Haig's suggestions and views on the war, when he wasn't even on the front line. The more reliable sources, are the sources that come from the soldiers. Which are like the sources, 5+6, The letter in source 7 describes how a captain's friend had to write a letter to the captain's sister, which described his death, which he states to be a quick and painless death. ...read more.

    Conclusion

    Livesey's book is about the war and this may look like Livesey is only viewing Haig for his topics and of how he felt about what he did. Each book dates, 1989 and the other 1991, these years are very close so they may have used the same books. Neither of them would have fought in the war. These sources give an impression that the books were meant for adult reading so the audience would have been the same. Like from Livesey's source, ''Perhaps his greatest failing was his constant often-misplaced optimism...'' And Warner's source is similar in language. The thoughts and views of Haigs titled depends on the opinions of who's reading. Depending if the person is rich or poor. The only information we get is from Liveseys book, which is about battles, death, blood and murder of the troops. Warner's book is about his family's sympathy. Together they are both balanced views. The fact is that there is no answer to ''Was Haig the butcher of the Somme'' because it depends on who is reading it, what your own personal issues are, experiences. People's opinions on what the people in command should have done. ...read more.

    The above preview is unformatted text

    This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

    Found what you're looking for?

    • Start learning 29% faster today
    • 150,000+ documents available
    • Just £6.99 a month

    or


    Not the one? Search for your essay title...
    • Join over 1.2 million students every month
    • Accelerate your learning by 29%
    • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

    See related essaysSee related essays

    Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

    1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

      The Battle of Cambrai was notable for the success with which the British employed tanks. On November 20, 1917, about 400 British tanks, supported by infantry moved forward into the German lines, achieving an advance of 8 kilometres. In a sweepingly successful start to the battle, 12 miles of the

    2. Haig butcher of the Somme?

      Those who believed he didn't care for the soldiers, that he was looking for the glory, and the money that came with winning the war, and therefore he was a butcher; were most noticeably due to individual and political reasons, such as a Private or a Socialist.

    1. was haig butcher of the somme

      I never met a man in a high position who seemed to me so utterly devoid of imagination." Lloyd George, War Memoirs (1928) As an executive commander there has hardly been a finer defensive general; in contrast, among those who have gained fame as offensive generals none perhaps have made worse errors...

    2. Haig Fully Deserves His Reputation as 'Bungler and Butcher of the Somme.'Discuss

      This source suggests that Haig is a butcher and a bungler. He is a butcher as the source suggests that he still sent men to their deaths knowing that there wasn't a realistic chance of a breakthrough. It suggests that he was a bungler as he used a terrible strategy.

    1. General Haig

      Source D is a poster which is called 'Your Country Needs Me' taken from the book General Haig's Private War. It shows a caricature of General Haig pointing towards himself mimicking the famous poster of Lord Kitchener and Uncle Sam pointing at the person reading it.

    2. feel there are both points for and against Haig being the "butcher of the ...

      Source C is the complete opposites of B; it is the experience of a private that actually fought in the battle. He says that hundreds of dead soldiers were "...strung out on the barbed wire..." This gives us the view of someone who was actually part of the terror -

    1. Field Marshall Haig - 'the butcher of the Somme'?

      Although the sources are not about Haig or the Battle of the Somme, it is still relevant to historians because it reveals the modern day attitudes towards Haig and the Battle of the Somme. Modern day attitudes portray Haig as a typical Field Marshall, one that never comes to the battlefield but works miles behind the frontline.

    2. Battle of the Somme: 1 July - 13 November 1916

      Even so, the gains made here were consolidated upon rather than exploited. The British troops were for the most part forced back into their trenches by the effectiveness of the German machine gun response. Many troops were killed or wounded the moment they stepped out of the front lines into No Man's Land.

    • Over 160,000 pieces
      of student written work
    • Annotated by
      experienced teachers
    • Ideas and feedback to
      improve your own work