• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was it the British governments' policy of appeasement which led to war breaking out between Britain and Germany in September 1939?

Extracts from this document...


Was it the British governments' policy of appeasement which led to war breaking out between Britain and Germany in September 1939? There were many factors that led to the outbreak of war in 1939. There were long-term factors, such as the Treaty of Versailles as well as trigger factors such as the Nazi-Soviet pact. In 1919 the Treaty of Versailles was signed by sixty countries but the most important and influential countries at the agreement were France, Britain and America. The aim of the treaty was to work out what to do to punish Germany, the losers of the war. The treaty of Versailles imposed many harsh consequences on Germany. It made Germany accept the war guilt clause. This meant Germany had to accept blame for the war, which meant they had to be punished. Germany lost a lot of land, was never allowed to re-unite with Austria, and was made to pay very, very heavy fines. Obviously Germany resented this, as the war was not their fault at all.1 This created friction between Germany and Britain and France. The Treaty of Versailles has been called the "Seed bed for World War Two". Unfortunately due to Britain and France's own problems they never really truly enforced the Treaty of Versailles. ...read more.


He was testing the Allies by seeing what they would do as now he was breaking the Treaty of Versailles and the Locarno Treaty.7 This only proved to Hitler that neither Britain nor France were willing to defend the Treaty of Versailles. This view was backed up two years later when Germany re-united with Austria. The biggest weakness, as Hitler saw it, was in the Sudeten Crisis in 1938. The Sudetenland contained a population where over 50% of the people were German. After Anschluss8, Czechoslovakia and the Sudetenland were the obvious choices for Hitler and his plan to revise the Treaty of Versailles and achieve "Lebensraum"9. While stirring up the Sudeten's with a speech at Nuremberg, September 1938 he said "the German's in Czech are neither defenseless, nor are they deserted" Britain and France were desperate for a peaceful solution. Chamberlain said, "How horrible, fantastic, incredible that we should be digging trenches because of a quarrel in a far away country between people of whom we know nothing" In desperation he flew to meet Hitler on 15th September. He thought that although he was an aggressive dictator he would be a realistic and reasonable man. He agreed to give Hitler the areas where over 50% were German. ...read more.


The expenditure dropped from �692 million in 1919-20 to �115 million in 1921-22. Conscription was abolished in 1920. 6 Anglo-German Naval agreement, June 1935 - Allowed Germany to have a navy 35% of the British Navy. Britain signed it in a bid to keep Hitler happy but also to ensure that he wouldn't get to powerful in comparison to Britain. 7 The Locarno Treaty of 1925 guaranteed the western frontiers of Europe 8 Anschluss was when Germany and Austria became re-united. 9 Lebensraum was the drive to acquire adequate living space for all the Aryan (Blonde haired, blue eyed, German "master race") without being polluted by the "untermenschen" (the subhuman race) e.g. Jews. 10 "When the next crisis came, Hitler was even more confident that he knew his adversaries: "our enemies are small worms" he would tell his generals in August 1939. "I saw them in Munich".... The Manchester Guardian shrewdly noted, "Hitler will be able to advance again, when he chooses, with greatly increased power. - Taken from "Hitler: Nemesis" By Ian Kershaw. 11 The Molotov - Ribbentrop pact compromised of a ten year non aggression pact, promise of economic co-operation and a secret protocol for the division of Poland and Eastern Europe into two spheres of influence - Lithuania and Vilna to be German, Estonia and Latvia to be Russian. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Aircraft carriers were also being developed with greater commitment. Submariners were trained abroad - Versailles did not cover this, so it did not break the terms of Versailles - only the spirit. * No air force was allowed. This happened but as with submariners, potential pilots were trained abroad or using gliders in Germany to educate them in the theory of flying.

  2. World War 1 - Breaking of the Stalemate

    Germany therefore gained an advantage due to the use of gas. Tanks were first developed by the British. The tank was given its name, when the British sent some over to Russia, labelled as Water Tanks to avoid knowledge of them getting to Germany.

  1. Why did war break out in Europe in 1939

    However France and Britain were very wrong, in March 1939 Hitler began the take over of the rest of Czechoslovakia, using the same excuse that Germans in Czechoslovakia were being mistreated and also that law and order was breaking down.

  2. How significant was the Night of the Long Knives in enabling Hitler to consolidate ...

    As he could make legislation without going through the Reichstag or President, Hitler's word was now law. The third factor was the 'Night of the Long Knives' (30 June - 1 July 1934). Having ordered Ernst Roehm and the other SA leaders to attend a meeting in the Hanselbauer Hotel

  1. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    - even the conflict between Austria and Russia was not necessarily fatal. c. the War as a diplomatic accident : - Austria did not time for war (she only seized opportunity), but was determined to teach Serbia a lesson. - Germany's support to Austria did not mean to want war,

  2. Was the Policy of Appeasement correct?

    Germany would become communist and slowly communism is spreading westwards. Moreover, an alliance system would have been vaguely formed with democracy (UK and France) against communism (Germany and Russia). This is would increase the tension between the countries and as this was a major factor of WWI, the British were clearly trying to avoid this.

  1. Describe The Nazi-Soviet pact. Explain why relations between Britain and Germany changed in ...

    The Pact meant that not only had Germany broken yet another term of the treaty, but Britain could no longer rely on the USSR for military support in the war. Thus the Pact caused a breakdown in relations between Britain and Germany in 1939.

  2. War led to totalitarianism, and totalitarianism in turn led to war. Comment on the ...

    Early in May 1921, the Reparations Commission announced that the total indemnity at 6,600 million pounds. In 1923, when Germany defaulted on her reparations payment and asked for a moratorium, France dispatched a force to occupy the Ruhr, which contained 80-90% of Germany's coal, iron, and steel industries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work