Was justice in the middle ages harsh and superstitious?

Authors Avatar

Was justice in the middle ages harsh and superstitious?

Most life in the Middle Ages was on the edge, on the edge of starvation, on the edge of freezing, on the edge of dying of disease. There wasn't a lot of food to spare. If you stole something, you may as well have killed him because it would be difficult to continue life without it. Horse-stealing was especially bad, because if you stole a horse, you were probably stealing a man's livelihood, his work, and his transportation all at once. Additionally, there were few prisons, no jails, and no way to house or feed a person who wasn't earning his own keep. And only the King had men to spare to keep someone like that alive and imprisoned. 
So most crimes were capital crimes were punished by death. 

Join now!

Justice in the middle ages was very harsh and superstitious to a certain extent for example trial by ordeal was superstitious because they relied on god to make the decision for them to live or not but in fact it was the priest who would decide who was innocent. Robin Hood is made up from stories and songs which was a man who lived in the forest with the outlaws and robbed from the rich and gave to the poor. People who were rich was less likely to get punished as they could clear there debt with paying the king ...

This is a preview of the whole essay