"Was life better for the Russian's by 1914 compared to 1900?"

Authors Avatar

Rhiannon Lane        29/04/2007

“Was life better for the Russian’s by 1914 compared to 1900?”

  • The Duma: It allowed freedom of speech and other political parties which the people never had before but its debatable whether there was actually any use for it. The first two were dismissed straight away because they disagreed with the Tsar. Although it was the Duma that was responsible for developing the schemes of national insurance for industrial workers which was something that they had needed for a long time. So in that respect they were useful in changing a few things in the people’s lives.
  • Industry had changed a great deal since the 1900’s as well. Mainly because there was an industrial revolution!
  • Industrial developments: Stolypin’s main concern was the peasants but he didn’t neglect the Russian’s industrial development. From 1908 onwards there was a substantial growth in coal, iron and steel industries. In 1914 Russia was still deficient in provision of roads and railways. Although the increase in industry had created more jobs and there were few signs of unrest in the period 1908-1914. Unlike in the 1900’s were it would be normal to have riots and strikes among the peasants/proletariats.
  • There were great land reforms  Stolypin had land reforms as one of his main objectives…as well as to repress disorder.
  • Results of the land reforms:
  1. Communally owned grazing and pastureland was divided up.
  2.  The land captains lost their power they had over the peasants.
  3. Joint family ownership ended and it was the eldest person in the family that was considered to be the owner of the household’s allotment.
  4. The peasant’s land bank was increased so that the richer peasants (Kulaks) could buy out their poorer neighbours.
  5. The peasants were able to have passports on the same terms as everyone else and so this increased the mobility to the different towns. This meant that a lot of them could move to Siberia.
Join now!

  • The emancipation of the serfs was a fundamental change in Russian society and economy. It involved over 40 million people and it was inevitable other reforms would follow if this had happened.
  • The government was still autocratic and repressive.
  • The reputation of the monarchy had never really recovered from the events of Bloody Sunday.
  • Industry was still small compared to Western Europe standards.
  • Agriculture was also still very poor despite Stolypin’s efforts. It would be years before anything would have an effect.
  • Nicholas failed to realise the need for change and didn’t realise how ...

This is a preview of the whole essay