• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was life improving for most Russian people before the outbreak of the First World War in 1914? Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Was life improving for most Russian people before the outbreak of the First World War in 1914? Discuss The 1905 "revolution" was a massive wake up call for The Tsar and his government but he didn't react quite the way some people wanted. Tsar Nicholas II could have gone two ways: He could think himself lucky to have survived the revolt and drastically reform government policies or regain total autocratic power. Unfortunately he chose the latter. In his first repressive step to reaffirming his absolute rule, The Tsar appointed Stolypin to replace Goremykin as Prime minister. Stolypin was notorious for being heavy handed but an excellent right wing leader, the Kaiser Wilhelm once asked the Tsar if he could lend him Stolypin for a few years! In 1906 a lot of the violent disturbances a ceased in the cities but had carried on in the countryside but Stolypin soon changed that. He set up military courts that had the power to hang people on the spot without trial and thousands of people were killed by this method, which was known as 'Stolypin's necktie'. ...read more.


The first Duma met and was dissolved in the same year and in 1907 the second Duma met and was dissolved the same year. The 1905 revolution changed things but not for the better. It only brought about more persecution and repressive policies. Stolypin's Agrarian reforms were seen by many as the first step towards a changing empire. In the November of 1906 the prime minister introduced the Agrarian reform, which involved the abolition of redemption payments for allotment land and the setting up of the peasants bank which its main purpose was to provide loans to the peasants. This was one of the governments more progressive policies and it actually did work quite well. Some peasants moved to urban areas leading the way forward for wealthier peasants to buy and farm more land, as a result of this there was a record harvest in 1913. However the poorer peasants were forced to leave their land and look for work elsewhere in the countryside or in the cities. So Stolypin's land reform had mixed blessings, it helped the richer peasants but only persecuted the poorer even more. ...read more.


This harsh defeat of the Lena Goldfields strike only opened the floodgates for even more workers protests. The aspect of the Empire that improved the most was the agricultural side of Russia which was vastly improved by Stolypin's reforms however, the reforms meant that very poor peasants were forced to find work elsewhere. The Agrarian reform made life better for some people and if it weren't for the 1914 war there would have been a more productive side to Russian agriculture. The Duma's were as near as the Tsar got to Democracy and they were in the Tsars words supposed to "advise" him and not give him orders. The workers wages were lower than the glum days of 1903. Anguish was at an all time high and the only people benefiting were a few of the successful farmers, the gentry and urban landowners. On the whole, life was better before the 1905 revolution because the up rise only pushed the tsar in to a corner and it made him realise that he needed to regain autocratic power so it wouldn't happen again. Well he certainly regained his power! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Was life improving for the Russian people before 1914

    Things did not turn out as planned as the Duma had little if any power; they could not pass laws, could not appoints ministers and could not make any individual decision as the Tsar could make anything the Duma brought forward as void and null and dissolved it.

  2. The Russian Revolution - 3 Essays

    The Duma had little influence over the Tsar and new laws, and the first two Dumas were dismissed for demanding reforms. Russia was an unfair society that desperately needed social, economic and political reform. Part 2 Why was the 1917 March successful?

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    B, in contrast, starts with a powerful one worded sentence 'War!' and then goes onto say how there were 'no cheering crowds' and 'no flags carried around in procession' and 'no band playing the National Anthem'. This was all because of the soldiers being slaughtered on the front line getting no medical attention for 6 days, minimum.

  2. The First World War

    The major human resources involved in industry and agriculture were women and teenagers who could not be the sufficient forces to provide full production process. People were suffering from hunger, high prices for food and goods, lack of bread, exhausting work and discontent of continuous war.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    In Russia, with the establishment of peasants' soviets, they embraced the overwhelming majority of the population. Throughout the nine months between February and October, the soviets represented a rival power to the capitalist state. It was a period of "dual power".

  2. Was size the most important reason in making the Russian Empire of Tsar Nicholas ...

    This was never a good idea as ordinary people would see this as the only way of living and might be encouraged to start a revolution. With Russia being in the state it was this could affect the whole county.

  1. Was the Russian government policy towards the peasants and the workers in Russia from ...

    When in 1820, the spread of European revolution had convinced Alexander I that encouragement given to liberalism was at the same time encouraging revolution. He turned to reactionary. When Nicholas I became the Tsar in 1825, the pressure for the abolition of serfdom grew rapidly.

  2. How far were things improving in Russia before the First World War?

    These great boosts in Russian industry, notably coal and grain, were greatly due to the new Prime minister that tsar Nicholas II appointed in 1906; Peter Stolypin. Stolypin greatly increased food production in 1908 by allowing wealthier peasants, the Kulaks, to leave the inefficient mir communes and buy up lands for themselves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work