• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall?

Extracts from this document...


Was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall? Nicholas II acted as an autocratic monarch rather than a constitutional leader, and this was a factor in his eventual downfall and abdication. Other factors included, him leaving Russia in the incapable hand of his wife, Alexandra, who herself was greatly influenced by Rasputin. The 'Holy Man' Rasputin was becoming more and more popular with Alexandra for helping their only son, Alexis's with his haemophilia, and his strange but powerful brand of spirituality certainly affected both Alexandra and Nicholas. It could be argued that Nicholas was himself responsible for allowing the power of Rasputin to extend so far and to influence his political decisions. Historians are in agreement that Nicholas lacked the necessary skills and qualities to rule a rapidly changing country. There were however factors outside of Nicholas' control, including his son's illness, that he could not be held directly responsible for. Indeed Russia was a huge country which was very hard to govern even for the most competent Tsar. One of the first factors which Nicholas was responsible for was his weak character and the fact that he allowed Alexandra to be so dominant. She encouraged him to hold on to his absolute power when a change in his style of leadership may have been a more politically useful tactic. A very significant contributing factor to Nicholas' downfall was the Russo-Japanese war in 1904-05. ...read more.


Nicholas regretted signing the October Manifesto and he dismissed Witte, the man who encouraged him to sign it. In Witte's place he appointed a man called Peter Stolypin. Stolypin got to work immediately; he set up a special court for people who were obviously guilty it was called 'field court for civilians'. The people who were being tried could not be found innocent. They were either sentenced to exile or execution. By the end of 1906 over one thousand terrorists or revolutionaries were sentenced to execution and another 20,000 were sentenced to exile. His measures were tough but effective, the number of Russian revolutionaries went down from 100,000 in 1905 to 10,000 in 1910. This settled the revolutionaries and helped Nicholas greatly but still people were annoyed at these harsh measures. Stolypin also tried to reduce revolutionaries by helping the peasants because they made up the majority of the population. He tried to give them better standards of living and encouraged them to buy their own land. The government provided loans for the peasants but still only the wealthier of them could afford loans. Although Stolypin's harsh measures had worked the economy remained weak. Appointing Stolypin helped the Tsar and shows that he was not totally responsible for his own downfall because he helped reduce opposition to his rule, but it could be argued that these brutal methods were in fact only delaying the inevitable Revolution against his government. ...read more.


People were dissatisfied with the government, rising prices, and food shortages. Women were queuing for hours outside the bakery only to be told that there was no bread left. The women stormed the bakeries and by the next day thousands of workers were on strike, crowds gathered and chanted anti-government slogans. The crowds were getting out of hand attacking shops and setting buildings alight. The Tsar ordered the commander of the military forces to put an end to the disorders but the generals troops were new recruits and had sympathy for the people as they too were suffering. Nicholas did not realise the seriousness of the riots until too late and on March 15th Nicholas was forced to abdicate. After looking at all the factors that contributed to Nicholas' downfall, it would appear that Nicholas was to a very great extent responsible for his own downfall. It could not be said that he was totally the cause of his own ruin but certainly his actions contributed greatly to the increased unrest within Russia. The brutal treatment of his political enemies was only effective in the short term, and his lack of successful leadership on the battlefields led to more suffering for his already starving people. Nicholas made many bad decisions such as leaving the country in the control of with his wife and allowing Rasputin's astonishing rise to power. There were other factors which contributed which Nicholas had no control over such as his son's illness, the harsh Russian Winters, the unstable political situation outside of his borders and the very size of his country. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is a thorough and strong response that covers all the key points well. The author regularly links back to the question and offers a convincing conclusion. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 09/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    By May and June, different groups were demanding changes. Middle-class liberals demanded an elected parliament, freedom of speech and the right to form political parties. National groups, such as Poles and Finns, demanded their independence. The Jews wanted equal civil rights. During all these disorders, in September, a peace treaty was signed between the Russians and the Japanese.

  2. Nov 97 : How serious athreat to the French Revolution was presented by the ...

    of Man, decree by which 1 January 1792 was the fixed day for the �migr�s to return to France or sentenced

  1. The Causes of the October Revolution

    At the same time as this the Bolsheviks were spreading propaganda and gaining massive support with the Russian people. The last thing that the Army wanted was a Communist revolution because the need for an army would be very limited and hundreds of thousands would lose their jobs.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    Most of the charges against the defendants in the show trial were that they had been involved in 'the united centre', this was a conspiracy against Stalin and the Soviet Union started by Trotsky. These trials were held in public, to show the soviet people Stalin was making Russia better.

  1. Why did Russia leave World War One?

    In turn the Germans were firing machine guns while the Tsar planned to lead his army on horseback, this gives us an idea of the diversity between the countries' progression. In the end by late 1917 Russia finally left the war.

  2. How secure was Nicholas II as Tsar in 1914? Nicholas II was Tsar for ...

    He was therefore able to pass many land reforms, which in turn help Nicholas' popularity. Therefore the Dumas helped Nicholas in the short term. However the Dumas also cause long-term problems with the Tsar that deeply affected his security. His continuous dissolving of the Dumas angered members and made people

  1. What Led to the Downfall of the Tsar?

    The lack of a significant bourgeoisie meant the intellectuals and wealthy who were more likely to be placated by promises of increased democracy, such as the mostly ineffectual Duma, were not large enough to have any real influence over a proletariat who by 1916 clearly felt that enough was enough.

  2. Why Was Russia Considered Backward in the Early 19th Century?

    Britain was encountering the Industrial Revolution and revolutions were occurring in America and France. Russia was very much still made up of villages and farms that had to be practically self-sufficient. There were minimal towns and as so little could be made the work carried out was considered to be minimal and insignificant as Russia was so large.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work