• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Pohibition bound to fail Question A

Extracts from this document...


Was Prohibition Bound to fail? a) Sources "a" and "b" are extracts from 1970's history books, discussing prohibition in the USA in the 1910-20 period. Both extracts agree on the causes of prohibition but develop different points in detail. Firstly, "a" and "b" both agree that the influence of the Women's Christian Temperance Union (the anti-saloon league) was strongly linked to prohibition. They were a pressure group that intended to make every state in the country "dry" (alcohol-free) by getting the government to introduce prohibition. Source "a" cites the "influence of the anti-saloon league" as a reason for prohibition and "b", concurring with this, states that the cause was aided when the "Women's Christian Temperance Union...joined the crusade". Source 'a' and 'b' agree that the anti-saloon league were actively involved in the prohibition coming into place. ...read more.


Both sources agree that the preservation of grain is important but source 'b' takes this point further as it tells us the anti-saloon league wanted grain to be banned completely, whereas 'a' only says there was a 'concern'. But essentially both sources are in agreement that the preservation of grain was a factor contributing towards prohibition. Also popularity of prohibition could have created a 'domino effect' in America, as 23 states were already dry in 1917, the neighboring states to the ones already alcohol free, may be influenced. Source 'a' supports this popularity by stating '23 states had already introduced a ban on alcohol' and 'b' simply says 'nation-wide campaign' meaning the whole of America was in support of this. The popularity is agreed by both sources. As feeling towards Germans would be negative due to the war, many Americans would not want to buy a German Beer and be seen as un-American, the majority of beers were German. ...read more.


It states '30,000 speakeasies in New York' Speakeasies were secret bars, selling illegal alcohol. Gangsters were also a problem as the 'bootlegged' (smuggled illegal alcohol across the US border). Gangsters like Dutch Schulz and Al Capone. Source 'b' has explained the causes in more detail, 'a' has only explained crime occurred but not stated any particular crimes. In conclusion, both sources have agreed in many ways for example, both agree the anti-saloon league, Preservation popularity and immorality are causes of prohibition, but 'a' goes further with giving more reasoning and opinion on all factors bar Grain preservation, in which 'b' explains this issue with greater reasoning. Also both sources agree that an effect of prohibition was crime, 'a' states this in a clear, to-the-point way with use of fact, but 'b' gives more factual insight and explains further what crimes were taking place. Both sources agree on prohibition, but 'a' has a better insight. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    All sources have some element of truth in them and they are all useful to a historian studying a particular period in time. But some sources are less reliable than others due to numerous factors, such as the time period they were written in and by whom they were written by.

  2. Why did prohibition fail? - Gangsters, Widespread illegal drinking, lack of support, impossibility of ...

    It injured and killed many, proving the ASL's argument about a happier, healthier, more productive workforce completely wrong. Lack of public support was definitely quite a major reason for the failure of Prohibition, which is not closely linked with gangsters taking control of the illegal alcohol industry.

  1. Why did prohibition fail?

    The vast majority of the USA didn't agree with Prohibition but the minority was a very powerful minority. Prohibition never had full public support, which virtually made it destined to fail before the law was even passed - saloons were a way of life for many men, so when the

  2. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    The cartoon in source I shows a web of corruption, as people of power who should be taking part in the enforcement of the law are holding their hands out behind them, signifying "taking a back-hander" - a bribe.

  1. Was Pohibition bound to fail Question B

    But the other hand is put across the open till in a protective way. The bar man is dressed in an outfit similar to one a ventriloquist's puppet would wear and the barman's reflection appears to be the devil, this gives the suggestion that bartenders are evil and are the devils puppets, all proceeds go towards evil.

  2. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    The poster also shows that criminals (represented by Satan) were continuing to import and produce alcohol. This poster is a good way of showing the problems that America was having with prohibition, as it was simply too big a task to perform, and was not helped by criminals supplying even more alcohol.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to Fail

    This is very true because after the man has spent all the money that he's earned he will be poor and without the money he earn his family will stay poor. It mainly tends to be the men out in the saloons because the women were at home looking after the family.

  2. Was Prohibition Bound To Fail?

    more than 30,000 speakeasies in New York", but it doesn't go into any detail. It just cuts off there. Source B doesn't really associate Prohibition with crime, I can't really see anything in there that does. The word "violent" is the only thing that gets close, but I think in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work