• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Prohibition Bound To Fail?

Extracts from this document...


Was Prohibition Bound To Fail? In this coursework I will explore the factors which lead prohibition Of alcohol to fail. I will come to a conclusion on whether or not The prohibition was bound to fail using several different sources. Prohibition of alcohol in USA was introduced in 1920 due to a number Of reasons. It was perhaps the most commonly violated law in the History of the United States. The National Prohibition Act, or the Vested act, stated that anything that contained over 0.5% of Alcohol was now intoxicating and illegal. Exceptions were however Made for alcohol used for medicine or industrial purposes. Banning of alcohol was not a new idea in the United States, much of The opposition to alcohol had been around for years. Protestants Disapproved of alcohol strongly, it was seen as evil and threat to Churchgoers who got drunk on a Saturday night and were hung over and Unable to attend mass on Sunday morning. Doctors sometimes blamed alcohol for babies who were born physically Or mentally disabled and for deaths during pregnancy. Alcohol had been frowned upon during World War I, it was said that Many soldiers were not able to fire straight because they were Drunk. The use of grain for brewing alcohol was momentarily banned In some states in the USA because they felt much of the barley could Be used as rations by the allies. ...read more.


The writer of source E however would have seen The effects of prohibition. Both sources show evidence of optimism That prohibition would have worked. Source F is biased towards Prohibition; the writer of source E is in favour of prohibition but Can see that it didn't work. Question d) Sources G and H are statistics showing the amount of alcohol seized By prohibition officers over the years and the amount of alcohol Related crimes reported by the Philadelphia Police Department. The Figures could show that prohibition was successful or they could Show that prohibition was unsuccessful. This depends on how they are Interpreted. Source G shows that the amount of alcohol seized by prohibition Officers in 1929 was almost 30 times the amount of alcohol seized in 1921. You could argue that the prohibition officers were getting Better at there job and catching more criminals or you could say That there were thousands more criminals and there was much more Alcohol in 1929. The latter scenario is more likely. Source H shows that over 35000 more people were arrested for being Drunk in 1925 than in 1920. The statistics also show a conflicting View. There were less people charged with being drunk and disorderly In 1925 than in 1920 but this could be interpreted differently. ...read more.


then It could support the view that prohibition was bound to fail. If a Man was willing to lose his money, family and children for a drink; Then why wouldn't he break the law for one? Source E (like source A) shows optimism that prohibition would work; It says that the citizens of the USA had become law breakers. This Suggests that many people were opposed to prohibition and supports The view that prohibition was bound to fail. Source F is a quote from a prohibition officer; this view is biased But shows determination and belief in prohibition. Sources G and H are statistics taken after prohibition was Introduced, the figures show the persistence of offenders and Generally support the view that prohibition was bound to fail. If The figures were interpreted differently, and then it could show that The prohibition officers were cracking down on offenders but we know That this is not true. Source I agrees with the view that prohibition was bound to fail, it Shows the people who introduced the system and the people enforcing The system taking bribes. Source J also agrees with the view that prohibition would fail, the Policeman himself had probably taken bribes, but this is not Something he would have admitted to at the time of the statement for The sake of his own credibility as a policeman. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    At the bottom of the poster there words that read 'slaves of the saloon'. The word slave is giving the idea that the men are addicted, influenced and controlled by alcohol. This is also showing that the man cannot go out of the habit of drinking alcohol and has no freedom what so ever and is very weak.

  2. To What extent was Prohibtion doomed to fail from its inception?

    "It didn't help that President Harding was widely known to drink alcohol regularly in the White House."11 If people continued to ignore the law of prohibition it would make the work of the agents of prohibition and the government extremely difficult and probably result in failure.

  1. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    This source is very reliable. Source F on the other hand, comes from the first Prohibition Commissioner for the United States of America, and appears to be particularly unreliable. It says that "The law will be obeyed... where it is not obeyed it will be enforced", which is contrary to

  2. American History Coursework

    of these states, as they had been accustomed to independently resolving situations such as this, due to the fact that the previous government, the Republicans, adopted a policy of Laissez Faire. Some influential democrats also argued that scheme such as this were not dissimilar to the USSR's methods of dealing

  1. Why did Prohibition Fail?

    In Chicago alone, there were 130 gang member murders within 1926 and 1927 and not one arrest was made. This was the effect of the fear of the gangs, which proved successful in preventing law enforcement against their trade. Gangster leader Al Capone is one of the famous gangsters in


    be like so therefore he isn't giving any evidence of prohibition its just opinion. [D] Study Sources G and H. Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful? If I just looked at source G I would say looking at the charts that prohibition was a success because the

  1. Was Prohibition bound to Fail

    This is very true because after the man has spent all the money that he's earned he will be poor and without the money he earn his family will stay poor. It mainly tends to be the men out in the saloons because the women were at home looking after the family.

  2. History - Prohibition

    He has come to realize that prohibition could not work in an American society. Source F was written by John F. Kramer, who was the first Prohibition Commissioner. This meant that his job was to enforce Prohibition. He is speaking in 1920 just when prohibition had been introduced.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work