• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Prohibition bound to fail?

Extracts from this document...


History Course Work Was Prohibition bound to fail? 1a Both source's A and B agree with one another. In source A - 'the bad influences of saloons' resulted in a crime boom. The respect for the law was diminished and It changed customers and habits. The 'wartime for preserving grain for food' was an issue that was used in favour of prohibition, it meant that instead of wasting money on alcohol, it should be saved for the war. The 'Anti German' feeling was very strong, this was because 'men was in the arm forces'. I believe this was used in favour of Prohibition. In source B - 'the Women's Christian Temperance Union' is mentioned first. This is also an important group for Prohibition. It also states the 'evils' of alcohol leads to more crime and drink. It was used by groups in favour of Prohibition. When liquor was banned, the public demanded more alcohol. Then speakeasies were introduced which led to gangsters who specialised in violent crime. I believe both sources agree about the results that Prohibition should not have been introduced. The Prohibition movements strength grew after the formation of the Anti Saloon League as it states in source B. In addition, the Woman's Christian Temperance Union soon began to succeed in enacting local Prohibition laws. They both state that Prohibition would lead to increased violent crimes from gangsters. I believe the brewing industry and the Prohibition movement were closely related. ...read more.


1d I believe that source H is more reliable as evidence about the success of Prohibition. Source G shows that illegal stills increased, but since they are illegal, nobody knows whether this is true because you can't test it against the other sources. The amount of spirits seized went up. I believe this source was written to show activities of the FBI - but I don't believe we can rely on them entirely because illegal activity cannot have reliable statistics. Despite Prohibition it appears that more spirits were made and I know from other sources that more saloons and speakeasies and alcohol consumption went up. The FBI was responsible for making sure people obeyed Prohibition and so when they published their reports, they would show these findings because they would want people to have confidence that they were doing a good job. From my own knowledge I know consumption of beverage alcohol increased dramatically under Prohibition. This could have been because as it was illegal, people did it for a thrill. Consumption grew in the last years of Prohibition as illegal supplies of liquor increased and as a new generation of Americans disregarded the law and rejected the attitude of self sacrifice that was part of the bedrock of the Prohibition movement. Source H was published from 1920-1925. This is the same time as the numbers of the cars on the road increased. ...read more.


It also shows a rise in drinking, from my own knowledge I know this would be true. It doesn't say failure was 'inevitable' but it does imply it failed. Source H on the other hand only shows statistics from the city of Philadelphia. It also only shows statistics involving car crime and drinking, not general statistics on the failure of Prohibition. I know that more crime was likely to take place because the modern T fords were introduced at that time. So consequently there would be more cars on the roads. I believe it doesn't say that Prohibition was a failure, but it does say more drunk related crime. I think this suggests Prohibition was a failure, after all, if there is more 'drunken related crimes' more people might have been drinking illegally? Moreover, in my opinion, it does support the view of sources A, B, E and G that crime increased during Prohibition. But it doesn't actually say on its own that Prohibition was a failure. In final conclusion, I believe all of these sources mainly support the view that Prohibition failed and there was a huge increase of crime. This view also supports my own knowledge. I feel the sources do not suggest that it Prohibition was inevitable, although sources A and B suggest that because the Americans were being denied something they wanted, it was bound to fail and therefore to a certain extent was inevitable. Sources A, B and E suggest that the crime level was so overwhelming that Prohibition could never succeed and therefore again could be described as inevitable. Sarah Warburton ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    The writer being a wealthy industrialist employed workers and did not want his workers to attend work being drunk or having hung over's. This most likely the reason why he initially supported prohibition. However since this letter was written with hindsight the writer has seen the effects and consequences of

  2. Why did prohibition fail?

    The public did not want to be told what they could and couldn't drink by the government and felt that they had no reason to not drink if they could get away with it, which leads to another reason why Prohibition failed - lack of enforcement.

  1. History - Prohibition

    the number of stills and gallons of spirits seized, which meant that there were more and more people breaking the law and so prohibition was not successful. However, it is possible that the percentage seized had actually decreased. Source H is statistics published by 'the City of Philadelphia Police Department,

  2. Prohibition - source related study.

    Source I is a cartoon entitled the national gesture, it shows 6 men standing in a line with their hand behind their back palm upwards-they're waiting for a backhander. They are labeled- Prohibition agent, Police officer, Politician, Magistrate, Petty Official, and Clerk.

  1. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    This source is very reliable. Source F on the other hand, comes from the first Prohibition Commissioner for the United States of America, and appears to be particularly unreliable. It says that "The law will be obeyed... where it is not obeyed it will be enforced", which is contrary to

  2. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    Prohibition had a dramatic affect on everyone's life, good or bad, but most people would say that prohibition didn't work. 3. Prohibition failed only because of the following reasons: Gangsters/Crime Public Opinion Do you agree? Explain your answer. The statement above in my opinion is false.

  1. Why Was Prohibition Attempted and Why Did It Fail?

    For some people, whether they actually believed in it or not, prohibition represented a victory of the wants of the whites over the wants of the immigrants. It stamped white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant superiority over the immigrants. However, there was opposition to prohibition from a number of groups.

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    Source I shows a great variety of people ready to take bribes whereas source J mainly concentrates on the corruption within the police force. Overall though source I does prove much of what source J states. F Study all the sources Do these sources support the view that the failure of prohibition was inevitable?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work