• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Prohibition Bound to Fail? Sources Questions.

Extracts from this document...


Was Prohibition Bound to Fail? Sources Questions b) Study Sources C and D. Were the artists of these two posters for or against Prohibition?' Both Sources C and D are for prohibition. This is apparent because in source C by the way the picture shows a picture of a man handing over his weekly wages for alcohol while his wife and children sit at home with no money. This shows that alcohol kept the poor, poor and was a reason for prohibition it also seems to be a comment on the social cost of prohibition by the heading "the poor mans club, the most expensive in the world to belong to" this seems to comment on how the cost of the saloon is more than economical i.e the mans wages, but also social and emotionally on his family , his wife is shown as distressed and breaking down. This was one of the main reasons the Anti saloon league crusaded for prohibition. Source D shows its support for prohibition. We can tell this because of the way the picture shows two children in tattered clothes, looking sad and longingly towards the saloon door. The caption underneath the picture is the most important thing, because it underlines the economical effect of the saloon. It says that their 'shoes and stockings and food are in the saloon too, and they'll never come out'. This is suggesting that the father of the children is in the bar and is spending all the money that should be used on the children's shoes, stockings and food. ...read more.


therefore might 'edit' figures When looking at the figures in source G it shows that prohibition was a failure because towards 1929, more illegal stills were seized and more gallons of spirits were seized. This suggests that more alcohol was being produced showing that prohibition was failing. On the other hand, it could suggest that the police were getting more efficient at doing their job and seized more gallons of spirits because they were getting better at doing so. When looking at the figures in source H it shows the prohibition was definitely a failure. This is especially apparent in the 'drunk' column. It shows that although more people were getting arrested for being drunk (suggesting that the police were doing a better job) but it shows that more alcohol must have been getting produced for more people to drink and for more people to break the law. But because Source H was written by the Police Department of Philadelphia it suggests that the source may have been biased as the department would try to be showing that prohibition was successful so that they didn't show themselves up as unable to enforce the law. (e) Study Sources I and J. How far does Source I prove that the policeman in Source J is telling the truth? Source J says that saloon owners and gangsters involved in bootlegging alcohol often bribed policemen. Source I agrees with this by showing how many of the authorities were willing to except bribes and turn a blind eye to the illegal activities taking place blatantly around them. ...read more.


This source suggests that the failure of prohibition was inevitable. In Sources F, G and H it is hard to tell whether they show that prohibition was bound to fail. In sources G and H it maybe suggests that it was bound to fail because the amounts of alcohol being seized were increasing greatly and there were more drunks and drunk drivers being arrested. In Source F though it is not clear and does not really say anything about it failing, this would be because the commissionaire would need to encourage people to be positive about the law. Source I and J definitely support the view that prohibition was bound to fail because it shows clearly the corruption that was going on. Source J says that it was all a 'conspiracy' and that his 'superior officers were involved in it'. This shows that prohibition was bound to fail because if the pillars of society weren't enforcing it properly then no one was going to obey the law. From my own knowledge I know that it is rumoured that even the president had the occasional alcoholic drink. Generally, over all, the sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable. The reason for this failure was that the majority of Americans did not want prohibition which meant that you had people trying to enforce a law which they themselves broke or disagreed with add to this copious amounts of corruption bribery and violent crime it was blatantly going to fail as source A says "..no earlier law had gone against the customs, habits and desires of so many Americans." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    Source D shows two children waiting outside a bar the title at the top reads 'Daddy's in there'. The poster is designed to get sympathy for the children waiting outside the bar and turn against drinking alcohol. The word daddy is showing the youthful innocence of the children who are

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    The 'behind the back' attitude is also demonstrated by the statement "He handed me an envelope, I took it and he was gone". It shows how quickly they had to do it and that they had to do it without anyone else seeing it as it is done in another

  1. To What extent was Prohibtion doomed to fail from its inception?

    Another factor making prohibition hard to enforce was that it was ignored by the majority of the American people from day 1. Many chose to defy the laws and continue with the use of alcohol, whether this be through making and selling the banned alcohol or merely by taking part in consuming it.

  2. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    They lost this respect because they found that the job was very dangerous to do. It was easier to accept bribes rather than risking their lives to stop somebody doing it, and because they couldn't enforce the law people lost a lot of respect for them.

  1. The USA Was Prohibition bound To Fail?

    empty pan this shows that his family is poor and hungry, while there husband/dad is out spending precious money on the evils of alcohol instead of spending it on food or on a future. In the circle there is little writing "The saloon is well named the "poor mans club"

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail?

    I think that the most reliable source is source E, this is because source E is written in 1932 the year that prohibition was repealed. This makes it reliable because the writer, had the advantage of hindsight, having already seen prohibition in action for most of its years, and had seen it fail.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    It is definite that these two sources support each other on certain reasons for the introduction of Prohibition, but not entirely, as they disagree on the most important reason for the establishment of Prohibition.

  2. why did prohibiotn fail question F

    Source F doesn't also because John F. Kramer was a prohibition commissioner and was telling us that prohibition will be prevented "we shall see that it is not. Nor sold, nor given away". Sources G and H do support the failure of prohibition but it also doesn't.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work