• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Stalin Necessary

Extracts from this document...


Was Stalin Necessary? Kate Ashton To answer the question 'was Stalin really necessary?' it is important to look at what he achieved in his 24 years from 1929 as leader of the Communist Party in the then USSR. Stalin was responsible for many good ideas. He wanted to modernize the USSR and as most of the industry was squeezed into just a few cities leaving the rest of this huge country in the same backward state it had been in a hundred years earlier, he realised that to be powerful he had to have more successful farming and industry as well as military power. ...read more.


It was almost definitely that fact that saved it from defeat when Hitler invaded during the Second World War By the end of the 1930's most Soviet workers had very much improved conditions and were well educated and skilled. There was almost no un-employment, unlike the West. 'Collectivisation' was Stalin's idea to put all the agriculture into the hands of the local Communist Party leaders and away from the farmers. The farmers did not like this as they were being asked to stop producing grain to feed their families and instead to produce crops for industry. The Kulaks, who owned their own land, refused to even hand it over and a long battle started. ...read more.


He ruled as a dictator and kept the Soviet Union apart from most of the rest of the world, keeping all foreigners out. He created a system of government based entirely on fear felt by every living citizen and his policies created a privileged class that took advantage of all of the rest of the people. Stalin was responsible for millions of deaths during the battles of the collectives; through the forced labour camps, the mistakes he made in the Second World War and just his personal campaign of violence and vengeance. So was Stalin 'necessary'? Could his modernisation/industrial revolution and military success have happened without the use of his violent and brutal Stalinist methods? It is equally as arguable both ways and possibly would have happened without Stalin but maybe not as quickly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    that the West was less likely to get attacked by countries like China. In addition, extravagant projects were carried out to display the might of the new Soviet industrial machine. This was the 'Dnieprostroi Dam' in the eastern USSR, which was for two years the world's largest construction site, and it increased the Soviet electric power output, dramatically.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Keynes believed that government spending could reverse the 'downward spiral' and so between 1933 and 1937, Franklin D. Roosevelt based his policies on Keynesian economics. However, Roosevelt did not believe that a government could go on spending more than it got back in taxes for long.

  1. Source based work on Impressions of Stalin?

    He uses the word 'comrade' to describe a man which shows his communist attitudes and equality. He does this in an attempt to show his communist nature rather than admit to his true dictator leadership. Stalin is shown in the story to be the only person who cared for the

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    Not a hand was raised in its defence, precisely because it was an unrepresentative anachronism. The reason for this was very well explained by the celebrated English historian of the Russian Revolution, E.H. Carr: "The SRs had gone to the polls as a single party presenting one list of candidates.

  1. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    Commenting on recent trials and executions, Robeson said that from what he had seen of the workings of the Soviet Government, "anybody who lifts his hand against it ought to be shot!" NOTE The reporter was Vern Smith. His report can be found in Paul Robeson Speaks, edited by Philip S.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    This means that these sources are likely to be more reliable an useful than sources such as Source A which is extremely likely to be biased. A large amount of differences between the account in source C and those of sources A and B are also noticeable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work