• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Cuban Missile Crisis a Success for Containment?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction The Cuban missile crisis was a major test for containment. Containment was the policy that was to try and prevent the USSR from spreading further into the world. The policy first came into action on 12th March 1947 when Truman made a speech. Kennedy later used this in 1962 when he formed a blockade around Cuba so that the USSR could not get its weapons of destruction to it. This was an act of containment because he stopped the USSR getting its weapons to Cuba and it stopped Cuba trading with the USSR so it had totally blocked off all physical contact with its ally. The argument that I am going to argue is that the Cuban missile crisis was a success for containment. ...read more.

Middle

In addition the crisis showed the success of containment in that Kennedy did not go to war endangering his country. He decided to contain Cuba which proved more effective. Here are the 3 main options that Kennedy had:- * Go to War * Block the USSR from Cuba * Do nothing Go to War If Kennedy had decided to do this, then the world could have been destroyed in a matter of minutes. It takes just 10 minutes for a short range missile to reach its maximum range. It takes only 20 minutes for a long range missile to reach its distance. So this idea would not have been the best thing that Kennedy could have done. Block the USSR from Cuba If Kennedy chose this option then he would be making an act of war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Arguments Against Containment might be considered to be unsuccessful because America had to remove its weapons of destruction from Turkey. However, this is one little point compared to the fact that because Kennedy used containment to his advantage, he got the weapons of mass destruction taken away and the people of America had no idea that America was removing its missiles from Turkey. I feel that this point is far greater than the point saying that America had to remove its weapons. Conclusion All in all I feel that containment was successful in the Cuban missile crisis because the points that are stated are much more superior to the ones against. My argument shows that containment was successful and it avoided the world coming to the end. Mark Baptist Page 3 24/11/02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis: Was President Kennedy the Saviour of the Cuban Missile Crisis?

    America had its missile basis in Turkey and the Soviets therefore also wanted its' missile basis within striking distance. America also had the submarines that could fire a Polaris missile which could not be detected. The Soviets didn't have this, see source (A2i)

  2. Cuban Missile Crisis Sources Questions

    The historian, therefore, takes a risk in giving his fairest possible perspective of the crisis. Following on from this, Source J talks of the end of the Cuban Missile Crisis as a victory of Soviet foreign policy, and that there was an agreement or settlement that there would be no

  1. History Cuba Missile Crisis

    Many events occurred between 1962 and 1969 that affected the relations of these two superpowers. At the beginning of this period relations were poor and short fused, with a nuclear war looking inevitable at some point.

  2. Q1.What were the Superpower relations like between 1945 and 1959, before the Cuban Missile ...

    It gave military strength on both sides now: in other words the military was neutral now that Russia had formed the Warsaw Pact. In 1953 Stalin past away and his successor was Nikita Khrushchev. He was a man that was respected for his charisma, charm and most of all people like his idea that many accepted, "co-existence".

  1. Were contemporaries correct in regarding President Kennedy as the savoir of the western world ...

    This went horribly wrong and made a mockery of the U.S. Unfortunately for America this was not the worst of its effects. The Bay of Pigs incident made a bold statement to Castro, it told him that America were out to get him and the previously neutral Castro was pushed further toward Khrushchev for help, and therefore communism.

  2. Cold War Short Essays - Questions and Answers.

    This allowed direct communication between the two superpowers in case a similar situation ever occurred again. Describe one international reaction to USSR?s invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968 (2 marks) Although the USA was opposed to the invasion of Czechoslovakia, also known as the Prague Spring, they did not interfere with

  1. How far was the Cuban Missile Crisis the most important event during the period ...

    The Korean War links well to the Berlin wall. The common link is that there is a physical division that symbolises the division between democracy and communism. I think that this shows how communism was being fought against. However, the two events have many differences. Such as the why the divisions were there.

  2. Cold War Summary, quotes and revision notes.

    "groups of countries in which the two systems reign supreme" * Asserted that was not Soviet intention to conquer world/impose system by force but it is clear he felt the USSR was free to compete for influence in countries that were not a part of either system yet * Avoid

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work