• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the defeat in the war the real cause of the Russian Revolution

Extracts from this document...


History Essay Was the defeat in the war the real Cause of the Russian Revolution? I think that there would have still have been a revolution without the war, it would have just taken a lot longer. The war was like a catalyst for the revolution. This is because Lenin believed that there would be a revolution but he wrote that "We will not see a revolution in our lifetime". There were major flaws in Russia before this. Tsar Nicholas II was not a natural born leader, he had, had great tsar's before him in the form of his father and grandfather. He was unprepared for the throne because of the sudden death of Alexander III. He was 'charming but weak'. Nicholas was a firm believer in the autocracy and so were the people that he appointed, like Pobedonostev who in 1984 was chief advisor to Nicholas. This meant that he didn't like to give any of his rule away and so when he made the October Manifest and Peasant Manifest in 1905 which stated that there would be franchise to all classes, fundamental civil liberties and the all the future laws would require the approval of the State Duma, less than a year later, after this 'revolution' was over he took it all back with the fundamental laws and Article 87 which allowed the tsar to rule by decree in emergencies. The tsar did not learn any lessons from 1905. ...read more.


With the church turning against the tsar because of his leniency with Rasputin the pillars of tsarism which kept the autocracy was already starting to crumble. Rasputin is also not to be blamed entirely for the revolution as he was only 'a symptom o the downfall to the autocracy, not a cause'. He was opposed to war and tried to urge the tsar to reconsider his decision about joining the war. Also he was assassinated in December 1916 by Prince F.F. Yusupov and V.M. Puriskevitch, his death was not met with sadness, infact it had the opposite effect. Some people blame his assassins for the revolution as no-one had Rasputin to fear anymore just like the peasants didn't have to fear Stolypin. The population had been increasing in the cities which made conditions very cramped and poor. This made even more reasons to strike and the numbers were greater, so when there was a revolution in Petrograd there were more people to join the opposition and they were in a more condensed space. There were many strikes because of poor working condition. Factory inspectors recorded the number of strikes that they found so not even all the strikes were counted in the final figures as there were not many inspectors and that is why the working conditions were poor. The growth of the population in St Petersburg went from 1 905 600 in 1910 to 2 217 500 in 1914. ...read more.


There was a big rise in armaments production but this was at the expense of other everyday goods as the factories were being used for this new production (80% of the labour force was engaged in war production by 1916) and this made the people unhappy with the situation because of the price increase. Industrialists were doing Ok as the government was paying to use their factories but they wanted more economic freedom. Most were forced into accepting to let the government make their supplies in their factories as non-war industries often went out of business, so there was incentive there for them to join in the revolution but not as much as the peasants and workers as they were still being paid. Because of the war the Duma was dissolved in 1915 which meant that the people would have no say in what was going the happen in the war. Becaus Nicholas took over the army he was solely to blame for the massive defeats. While he was on the front his wife was under the influence of Rasputin, to which nobody liked. The war alienated the government from its supporters. The revolutionary in 1917 was spontaneous as the leaders of the opposition were still in Switzerland. The demonstrators weren't expecting the army to join forces with them despite the huge losses as they had always been loyal to the tsar and demonstrators had been shot just the day before. The people saw their chance and took it because there was more radicalisation. In the end they got their revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The Russian Revolution 1917

    Also, if it were not for Lenin, there would have been no Bolshevik party to make such decisions, and, at any rate, there is significant evidence to suggest that Lenin was behind a great deal of these decisions himself. Also, it is a clear weakness of other parties that they

  2. Examine the importance of Russian weaknesses in WW1 in explaining the start of Revolution ...

    but Stolypin wanted to get the peasants to farm for the big cities like St Petersburg and Moscow. The way in which he went in trying to make these changes was by terrorising them. All though Stolypin tried by 1914 most peasants were still strip farming which meant that people

  1. Which of the following views best explain the fall of Tsarism of Russia? ...

    It's a report made to the Duma by Rodzyenko. In it he describes how the conditions in the army are worsening due to lack of ammo and equipment. The source shows that the army was unable to cope with the pressure of war due to the autocratic system which lacked proper planning and organisation.

  2. Why did the Tsar abdicate after the 1917 revolution

    In 1917 the war was much worse. There were very little supplies ranging from food to ammunition and the troops did not like this. Because the troops were in such bad conditions and were being killed in the thousands every day some started deserting the army and going home.

  1. Tsar's Russia & revolution, Hitler's rise to power revison notes.

    Bolsheviks now had power and Lenin encouraged them to take over. October Revolution The Bolshevik Central Comitee voted to seize the power from provisional government. The red guards attacked the winter palace and took over and arrested ministers. They also took over important stations and telephone exchanges.

  2. To what extent was the First World War a cause of the Russian Revolution?

    Russia were made up of the little surviving peasantry who weren't conscripted in the war. It was their duties to keep the home front going and supplying the troops fighting. With the war taking great numbers of casualties on peasants and workers - in 1916 it was counted that the

  1. 1917 Russian Revolution Perspective

    Now if you don't mind, I must attend to my family." "Thank you very much Nikoli, be safe." "I am now joined by Kristopher Redenski. Thank you for joining us today. What is your background and job Mr Redenski?" "I own a factory in Petrograd and employ many workers for it.

  2. Analyse how far WW1 caused the Russian Revolution.

    With lost of so many lives, the Tsar did not help himself when he went to the front lines to command the army. He was not an effective leader, and what he accomplished was merely being solely responsible for the disgrace of the army and the troubles that the war has caused.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work