• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the downfall of the autocracy inevitable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the downfall of the autocracy inevitable? On the 15th of March, Nicholas finally agreed to step down as Tsar, and tried to hand the crown over to Alexis before realising he was too ill to govern. Nicholas' brother abdicated after 24 hours for fear he would be just as unpopular, leaving Russia as a republic. The economy had collapsed. It can be argued that it was indeed inevitable, as there was a great need for an industrial revolution and the autocracy was failing to provide one. The first priminister of Russia, Witte, suggested increasing the amount of industry in the country, but was instantaneously sacked because of this suggestion, leaving Russia with it's more communication and therefore poor industry. ...read more.

Middle

Because of the lack of industry and money in the country, factories etc were of an appalling standard. The people became more and more displeased with the situation and so went on organised strikes, which eventually leaded to an economic breakdown. In addition, the army were at war at the time of the takeover in 1917 so there was no-one of authority, and the recourses to enforce such authority, left in the country to fight against the striking workers. After Nicholas lost the support of the army, there was no way of keeping the autocracy intact and so, the downfall of it would appear to be inevitable at this point. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, the country he went back to after the war would have been in better condition if he hadn't left it in the power of his wife Alexandra and his advisor Rasputin as they were obviously oblivious to the current state of affairs at that present moment in time and so, were not doing anything to improve them. In conclusion, if the war hadn't been a factor, and the Tsar had followed the advice of the Duma etc, most workers would have either not felt the need to or would have been too scared to strike, in fear of getting imprisoned or killed. But, since the war was a factor, it was indeed inevitable, as the defences were too weak to keep such a revolution at bay. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    He suggests that the Bolsheviks were important because they "channelled the amorphous grievances aired by the masses into definite political actions."17 Here the importance of the Bolshevik party is highlighted and although the party was around before the war it only really gained support through the impacts of the war.

  2. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    This unjust and unfair feeling was voiced within the peasantry communities and can be attributed to the need for agitation as agreed by Pipes: 'These differences along with the growing literacy, unaccompanied by proportionately expanding opportunities to apply the knowledge acquired from reading, within the peasant communities probably contributed to the to the restlessness of the lower classes.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work