Was the downfall of the autocracy inevitable?

Authors Avatar

Was the downfall of the autocracy inevitable?

On the 15th of March, Nicholas finally agreed to step down as Tsar, and tried to hand the crown over to Alexis before realising he was too ill to govern. Nicholas’ brother abdicated after 24 hours for fear he would be just as unpopular, leaving Russia as a republic. The economy had collapsed.

  It can be argued that it was indeed inevitable, as there was a great need for an industrial revolution and the autocracy was failing to provide one. The first priminister of Russia, Witte, suggested increasing the amount of industry in the country, but was instantaneously sacked because of this suggestion, leaving Russia with it’s more communication and therefore poor industry. This meant there was great poverty within the country, but the Tsar failed to let this be a reason to discontinue taxes, meaning most peasants were in great debt  and also very dissatisfied with Nicholas’ way of ruling.

Join now!

  Hardly anything had actually progressed since Nicholas has come to the throne which meant Russia had got further and further behind technologically and the agricultural economy was too backward to alter any of this. Because of the lack of industry and money in the country, factories etc were of an appalling standard. The people became more and more displeased with the situation and so went on organised strikes, which eventually leaded to an economic breakdown.

   In addition, the army were at war at the time of the takeover in 1917 so there was no-one of authority, and the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay