• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the failure of prohibition inevitable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Oliver Smith Was the failure of prohibition inevitable? Prohibition started in the 1920's and ended in 1933, a failure, but was it inevitable right from the start, could it have been stopped from its crash collision course, and if so how. I will be looking over all the sources to see why it failed and if it was inevitable right from the start. As soon as prohibition had started John F Kramer, the first prohibition commissioner spoke about how there was going to be zero tolerance with the lawbreakers and how the law will be obeyed everywhere and that it will not be either sold nor given away or manufactured. "We shall see that it is not manufactured, nor sold nor given away!" This is in source F, a speech about how prohibition will be enforced by John F Kramer. ...read more.

Middle

so much as in sources C & D, this is like emotional black mail and most of it was false but it was to shock people and stop them drinking. Prohibition was against a lot of peoples daily habits, people used to drink to feel good or get away from problems and keep calm but suddenly people couldn't do this and had a craving for alcohol and so went at all risks to get it, this is where gangsters came in and took over the whole business and took off where saloons left off. Gangsters started the whole backhander thing (bribery) and nearly everyone of a high status did it, like the picture shows in source I (7 men holding the hands out behind their backs.) it was know as the national gesture because everyone did it. ...read more.

Conclusion

saying the law was failing and that it was over. As this letter was confident it would have been completely honest showing that prohibition was a failure to be found. "Many of our best citizens have openly ignored prohibition, respect for the law has greatly lessened." I conclude that nearly all of these sources show prohibition was inevitable to fail but a few say it could have worked if the demand Kramer said he was going to were carried out, he would have stopped failure. The fact he only had 1500 to enforce the law over America was ridiculous, 1500 in one of the biggest countries in was nothing. It's around 30 to a state and a state is normally bigger than England. The time was right because the soldiers at war weren't allowed to drink, with the propaganda shocking people and the law enforcers, but all was lost to gangsters and bribery and that at the end with Rockafella letter at the end showed prohibition was well and truly defeated. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable?

    Straight away there were speakeasies but the police shouldn't have let them flourish in numbers. Where often evasion, corruption and organized crime were closely linked, bootleggers found it easier to smuggle in drink as the years went on. Before the law there had been 15,000 saloons in New York whereas

  2. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    on one side of the story and is only the word of the saloon keeper. The fact that source 8 is from the year 1908 and prohibition started in 1919 suggests to me that source 8 is not related to prohibition at all and cannot be used to justify the drinking habits of the people who drank during prohibition.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    It is definite that these two sources support each other on certain reasons for the introduction of Prohibition, but not entirely, as they disagree on the most important reason for the establishment of Prohibition.

  2. The USA Was Prohibition bound To Fail?

    and why, and they may have only wrote less on how it failure, but there is not any pro founding evidence to suggest that whether these two sources were for or against prohibition. (B) Sources C and D In source C, at the top of the poster it says "The poor man's club."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work