• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the failure of the Munich Putsch in Nov 1923 significant?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nazi Society 1) Was the failure of the Munich Putsch in Nov 1923 significant? I believe that the military failure of the Munich Putsch was quite insignificant, since the party made a serious of political gains as a result of the putsch. At the time of the Putsch the Nazi Party was growing and had over 55,000 members. It was in he unique position of having both Socialists and Nationalists under the same political banner. The Rhur crisis had gained the Nazis a lot of support, and with effective propaganda they became a leading force in anti-allie occupation politics. However it would be wrong to state hat they enjoyed positive election results, and in fact they won very few seats in the many elections that were held over that period. The Putsch had many obvious failures, such as the imprisonment of Hitler who the party greatly relied on, and the gun battle following, in which 16 Nazis were killed. Also division ripped through he party while Hitler was in prison. ...read more.

Middle

2) Source Work: How useful is source one for an historian studying the impact of the Hitler Youth movement on young people in Nazi Germany? Source one is very useful as a piece of evidence for an historian studying the impact of the Hitler Youth movement on young people in Nazi Germany. It is taken from a Socialist Democratic Party report concerning young people's involvement in the Hitler Youth movement (the SPD were one of Hitler's biggest political opponents). It tells us that young people were very much in favour of the Hitler Youth movement and felt that they gained form it. The movement placed more emphasis on the 'Volksgemeinschaft' (national community), and not on each individual family and person. This definitely, according to the source, appealed to young men. It made people believe that they would find employment if they helped in the persecution of Jews and Marxists. Hitler also let peasant youth be associated with the state; this was somewhat unprecedented. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source one paints us the picture of young men enjoying the novelty of wearing uniform, taking part in army style drills, enjoying life in army style camps, and actively giving something to the community. Also many of the young involved in the Hitler Youth movement believed that if the persecuted minorities they would have better employment opportunities. However source three tells us of the 'Edelweiss Pirates', a youth group opposed to the Nazis. This "riff-raff", (as source one describes them) supposedly stay out late at night, associate with young women and generally act as a discredit to society. The source accuses these young people of writing anti-Hitler slogans on walls such as "Down with Hitler". They are described as a danger to young people and are generally held up as scape- goats for the Nazi regime's failures. The authorship and motives are also very important in assessing how sources differ. Source one is written by the SDP and source three was written by the Nazis for the SDP and the Gestapo. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Munich Putsch: success or failure?

    This proved to be a huge mistake, as immediately he was allowed to leave; Kahr contacted the Police and the Army and informed them of the uprising. Hitler's diabolical judgement of Kahr proved to be critical as the following day when Hitler, Ludendorff and 3000 Nazis marched into Munich, 16 Nazis supporters were killed.

  2. Weimar, 1918 - 1923

    Again, this is indecisive, showing lack of any real power to do anything. AJ Nicholls: "The Kapp-L�ttwitz r�gime, called to power by the mutinous marine forces, was quite incapable of any constructive policy. Collaboration between the military and civilian elements in the coup was notable for its absence."

  1. Does the film The Battle of the Somme provide a realistic picture of life ...

    The only source that agrees with the film is source 8. The picture shows two nurses who are tending to a wounded soldier. From this picture, you can see how well the nurses are caring for the wounded. Although the photos don't tell us how quickly the soldier was attended to.

  2. Why did Hitler launch the Munich Putsch in 1923 and why did it fail?

    Then General Ludendorff, a great German hero also proclaimed his support to Hitler and the Nazis. All this support seemed to convince the audience. But by the next day things weren't looking good the three had gone back on their word and ordered the army to attack the leader of the Storm Troopers Ernst Rohm and the Storm Troopers.

  1. The Munich Putsch 1923 - source related study.

    It is more reliable then these sources because source A contains information provided by a witness that was their probably at the time of the Munich Putsch and saw the event. However witnesses are people who can forget over long periods of time, the witness information of source A was

  2. 'The events in Munich on 8th/9th November 1923 greatly increased the influence of Hitler ...

    Although this could be said as a reason why source B portrays Hitler as such a respected man the same could be said about the purposes of source A. Source A was written by a member of the Nazi party who left them and left Germany in the 1930's.

  1. History GCSE Sources Coursework – The Munich Agreement

    Henderson's reports, whether genuinely what he thought or not, must have influenced Chamberlain to think that Hitler was a reasonable man who did not want war any more than Chamberlain himself. This would have simply built upon the view Chamberlain already had that Hitler had some sense of honour.

  2. The Munich Putsch Sources Questions

    And also Hitler may have wanted the painting to demonstrate how good he is with crowds and to say that people didn't mind his presence there at the time. 3) Source C is the bill sent to the Nazi party from the owner of the Burgerbraukeller and also for the damage and theft committed at the event.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work