• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the label “the Butcherof the Somme” a fair description of General Haig?

Extracts from this document...


Was the label "the Butcher of the Somme" a fair description of General Haig? In December 1915 it was still a stalemate situation on the Western front. This was because both sides were dug deep into a line of trenches stretching over 70 miles from the Belgian ports to Switzerland; neither army could gain any ground, or make any progress towards victory. The British questioned how well their army was being led. On 10th December 1915 General Haig was appointed as the new commander of the British troops, succeeding Field Marshall Sir John French. Haig faced a difficult task, as he was to try to relieve the pressure imposed on the French by the Germans at Verdun, by attacking another part of the front lines. His tactics strategies and general opinions towards war caused some to label him as "the Butcher of the Somme". Does he deserve this title or was he doing his best for the war effort? ...read more.


Haig felt that "The machine gun is a much overrated weapon". During the early part of the battle of the Somme Haig's strategies overlooked the power of the enemy machine guns. On the 1st July 1916 the British troops were ordered to go "over the top". However they were to walk, not run, they also had to carry packs weighing about sixty pounds. The fact that the British were only able to move very slowly left them like sitting targets. They were almost instantly mown down by the German's machine guns. During the battle of the Somme General Haig did not use many different tactics or formulate any new strategies. Haig did not make full use of new technological advances such as the tanks. He could have used tanks to a much greater extent during the battle. There were many other ways in which Haig could have changed his tactics at the battle of the Somme. ...read more.


Messages took a long time to be delivered from Haig to the trenches and the Field Marshall did not have knowledge of the terrible losses of the 1st July until three days later. In contrast to Haig's butcher like tactics at the end of the war he was welcomed home as a victorious hero. As the battle of the Somme had served it's purpose by removing the pressure of the Germans from the French at Verdun. However was this too high a price to pay for victory? The battle of the Somme resulted in the largest number of British deaths than any battle before it. It took five months for the pressure on Verdun to be lifted. At the Somme only a few square miles of blood and mud had been gained in exchange for 700,000 deaths. I personally feel that Field Marshall Haig does deserve the title of "Butcher of the Somme" as he casually sent hundreds of thousands of young men to their deaths. He did not think of alternative tactics and readily accepted the large number of deaths and casualties. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    At first, the tanks were not integrated in the British war tactics. There was no provision made after land gains. As the tank was not a defensive weapon, any gains it did make were quickly swallowed up. The slowness and unreliability of early tanks prevented them from being a decisive weapon in their own right.

  2. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    Haig, as a cavalry officer, was unquestionably influenced by his cavalry warfare techniques, and was convinced that Cavalry charges through a gap in the enemy line would win the war. These tactics are simply ridiculous, and as a Tommy noticed, 'Our high command had not advanced beyond the tactics of the stone age.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    This would all take months. The Germans now began a race against time to win the war before the American's came. The early part of 1918 did not look propitious for the Allied nations. On March 3, Russia signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, which put a formal end to the

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    It comments on the hesitations George had about the cavalry and that if had not been for the Americans entering the war, the Somme would have been a failure. The opposite views show he has a lot of hesitation in the first.

  1. Does Field Marshal Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher of the Somme?

    up on it and made sure that the error was corrected, instead of just leaving Rawlinson to get on with it, and allowing him to continue with his plan. To then take an even higher risk, by trying to cover more land, on a plan that he wasn't even certain

  2. Causes of the General Strike

    The first test of the Triple Alliance's strength came when the mine owners regained control of the mines and pay cuts occurred. The miners went on strike on 15th April 1921, and called for the Railwaymen and the Transport Workers to join them, but the Triple Alliance failed to come into effect.

  1. Field Marshall Haig - 'the butcher of the Somme'?

    the first day of attack, 60,000 men were killed in the first day and also the barbed wire was not cut because the wrong type of shrapnel was used, which resulted in slaughter. But source B says almost the opposite of the truth.


    However, Source C was taken from an interview years after the battle and events may have been exaggerated. Whereas source B was written on the day of the battle and would be clearer in Haig's mind. Source C tells us the commanders were incompetent and did not understand the warfare,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work