• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the League of Nations a complete failure?

Extracts from this document...


Was the League of Nations a complete failure? This essay will try to define whether the League of Nations was or wasn't a complete failure. By complete we mean that no successes were achieved and only failures were. The League of Nations was set-up initially with four main aims: * To discourage aggression from any nation * To encourage other countries to co-operate * To encourage nations to disarm * To improve living and working conditions of people in all parts of the world The League of Nations did attempt to achieve all these objectives in different ways, always trying no to use violent methods. Only half of these aims were achieved partly. The main successes and failures concerned all the crises such as the Corfu and Manchurian crisis. Other failures such as the Disarmament Pact will also be described in this essay. Since the Failures were more important than the successes, it is important to begin and describe in detail in a chronological. The first one was back in 1919 when Italian nationalists took over the small port of Fiume in Yugoslavia. ...read more.


Eventually in May 1937, it ceased to meet. (1) Probably the greatest failure of the League was that the creator itself, The United States of America hadn't joined the League in the beginning. Woodrow Wilson was the man who had the idea to create it after seeing what had happened during WWI. The American population didn't want to suffer more casualties. This was known as Isolationism. The Senate was also scared that if the USA helped the European states financially it could have caused trouble in the American Economy. (2) The League faced two main crisis'; The Manchurian and the Abyssinian. The first one was a complete failure because the League lacked in speed. It took too long to make decisions and also tried to make up excuses. Britain wanted to keep good relations with Japan. After a year, The LONS came to a decision saying that Japan was wrong. Immediately after Japan resigned. Sources suggest that this crisis led to others because it gave a bad example to rulers such as Mussolini and Hitler. This was probably the beginning of the end of the League of Nations. ...read more.


(4) The other important success was the Upper Silesia conflict between citizens of this piece of land located between Poland and Germany. Half of the population wanted to belong to German territory and half to Polish. Riots began and both countries appealed to the League. The League decided that the country should be split in half and that half should go to German and half to Poland. This decision was acclaimed by the population and gave the LONS more admiration. The League also tried to help refugees and people living in poor conditions. A committee was set-up to try and solve these problems. This was almost certainly the most efficient section of the LONS. In conclusion to this essay, all the information provided from the sources suggest that the League wasn't a complete failure and that it was criticised too much. It accomplished some main objectives such as the Upper Silesian crisis and very importantly, the Aaland by achieving two aims in one. Luca Galbiati 05.12.02 Class 10 History (1) http://www.infoplease.com/ (2) http://www.projectgcse.co.uk/ (3) GCSE modern history-Ben Walsh---John Murray Ltd. 1996 (4) www.historylearningsite.co.uk ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The failure of the League of Nations

    The league was bound to uphold the peace treaties that had created it. However many hated these treaties as some of the terms were harsh and unjust and needed amending. This further undermined the league. A big weakness of the league was the self-interest of its leading members.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  1. Was the League of Nations a Success or Failure?

    had imposed, but it could not prevent the outbreak of world war two after Germany ignored the treaty and sent troops into a demilitarised Rhineland. Another agreement was the Kellogg-Briand pact (1928). This pact had 65 countries agree to never to go to war unless their country was attacked or threatened.

  2. Was the league of nations a complete failure?

    The self interest of the leading members also proved to be a downfall of the league, this was most severely highlighted during the Abyssinian crisis where the Hoare-Laval Pact made it clear that Britain and France were both willing to put their own countries interests before those of the league.


    A second case occurred at the battle of Tanagra in 457BC, in which allies specialising in sea-warfare were expected to contribute and assist Athens, naval allies having been governed by Athens. Both cases show that Athens felt a need to pressurise her allies further, possible out of fear of an attack from Sparta or Persia.

  2. Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations.

    It is significant to note that none of the settled disputes went against a major power which may have challenged the League's decision. This illustrates how successful the League actually was. The League of Nations was also quick to prove its value by settling the Swedish-Finnish dispute over the sovereignty of the Aaland Islands (1920-21).

  1. The League of Nations

    Unfortunately, the U.S.'s idea of civilization consisted of all nations being governed in the same way as America. We all know that the world is made up of many different cultures and beliefs and to be able to satisfy them all, let alone force them to believe the way that

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    At the Washington Conference, the USA, Japan, Britain and France agreed to limit the size of their navies, and that was as far as disarmament ever got. A disarmament treaty was made in 1923 by the League and was accepted by France and other nations, but Britain refused because it would tie it to defending other countries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work