• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the League of Nations a Success in the 1920's?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction: I am doing an essay on whether the League of Nations was a success or not, and why. The Americans set up the League of Nations after World War One. The League of Nations was designed to make nations settle their disputes peacefully, rather then going to war to settle their disputes and having another world war. Every one wanted World War One to be the last of all wars and to have world peace. This is one of the main reasons why the League of Nations set up. It was an idea in one of Woordraw Wilson's fourteen points towards world peace that was accepted by the main powers. 1) The League of Nations wanted there to be a place were nations could discuss world issues or problems this was to be achieved by having a world parliament. This was one step nearer to settling problems peacefully but the bad thing was that there were to many countries and disputes to settle. International peace and security was set up to encourage trade between countries it was also to stop war and aggression between countries. It was also to encourage disarmament because if there was world peace no countries should worry about being attacked. ...read more.

Middle

Britain and Italy guaranteed to protect France if Germany violated these borders. Germany also had to accept the Rhineland would remain a demilitarised zone. Germany and France then agreed to settle future disputes through the League of Nations; this pleased France very much. This basically tied up loose ends from the Treaty of Versailles. Then there was the Kellog-Briand pact in 1928. The Kellog-Briand pact was were sixty-five nations agreed to use force to settle disputes. So the Kellog-Briand pact just through disarmament completely out the window. That is why disarmament never happened. 3) Disputes: The four main disputes in the 1920's were Vilna in 1920, the Aaland Islands in 1921, the Corfu Incident in 1923 and the Greek Bulgarian War. Some of them the League of Nations dealt with them well but some of them they didn't deal with them fully. The Vilna incident the League did not deal with it well at all. It was between Poland and Lithuania. The problem was that Vilna was the capital of Lithuania but it had mainly Polish people in it. So what did the League do? They did nothing. The Aaland island; the League dealt with that problem reasonably well. ...read more.

Conclusion

The bad thing was that there to many Nations and to many problems to sort out. The I.L.O were a group of employers, governments and workers to help the workers condition. The problem was that having a group of employers and workers in the same room was a bad idea. All of these agency's were meant to work together to make the League of Nations successful. 5) Conclusion: The League of Nations was not successful because one the richest and most powerful country was not in it, America. Disarmament only happened with one country, which was Germany, Britain did not disarm, Italy didn't, Belgium, Poland, Czechoslovakia and lots of other countries did not disarm. The Locarno treaties also would of obviously made Germany want their Western Borders back. Then the Kellog-Briand pact just through world disarmament out the window saying that sixty-five nations could use force to settle disputes. Then the young plan to reduce Germany's reparation payments, even though Germany had revenge planed. The League of Nations had far to many loose ends that it was to hard to sort out other nations problems when the, League of Nations has it's own problems to sort out first. The League took on more than it could handle and seemed to be more of a fantasy dream. By James Jode ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was the League of Nations a success?

    Italy had the three states surrounding Abyssinia; Libya, Eritrea and Somaliland and now wanted Abyssinia as well. Not only would Abyssinia provide a wealth in natural resources but it would also be revenge for Italy who failed to conquer Abyssinia in 1896.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    There were several reasons why the Germans didn�t like the Treaty of Versailles. This essay showed these reasons. All of the armistice business, the fact that it was felt to be a diktat, the military reasons, the territorial reasons, the financial reasons, and the guilt clause.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    the strongest in the world so if any action was without them it would be weaker and also their army had not really been affected by war as the European armies had. Two other major powers had not joined the League of Nations Germany and Russia.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  1. The League of Nations in the 1920's - Success or Failure?

    France was too much of a nation to lose from the League and also too big to put on any sanctions that could affect it. There was a similar situation like this when Poland invaded Vilna in 1920 due to the population of Pole's there, and the League did nothing due to Russian proximity.

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920's?

    The League also strived hard to improve working conditions around the world. The international labour organisation was successful in banning poisonous white lead from paint and in limiting the hours small children were allowed to work. They also introduced a resolution for a maximum 48 hour week and an eight hour day.

  1. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    A fair conclusion at this point would be that the Athens treatment of her allies has reached a new level or inequality, going against the league's original intentions. But it could be equally suggested that Athens had methods of gaining total power over the allies that were under her control.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    Yet, the League delayed the decision on whether or not to ban oil exports to Italy for two months, fearing the Americans would not support the sanctions, and that its? members economic interest would not be further damaged. In Britain, the Cabinet was informed that 30,000 British coal miners were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work