• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the League of Nations likely to fail because of inherent flaws?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the League of Nations likely to fail because of inherent flaws? Yes The League was always likely to fail because it had many inherent flaws and was too weak. The League was restricted by its lack or/and inability to properly enforce sanctions that would actually hurt countries. Without America's backing the League was weak. America at that time was the world's biggest trading nation and the League's sanctions would not apply to them. This meant these sanctions would hit smaller countries much harder than they would the lager ones because America traded with all the larger countries. If sanctions were enforced on a larger country they could probably survive by just increasing their trade with America. Also, the countries of the League needed to trade with all the larger countries and therefore it made it much harder for trade sanctions to be upheld, as any sanctions would hit the countries enforcing them just as hard. However, it was much easier to enforce trading sanctions on a smaller country, as its trade was insignificant compared to that of the larger countries. Even when the League imposed trade sanctions on countries, countries that had their own self-interest easily broke them. ...read more.

Middle

Many of the aggressors in the wars were either larger nations or nations that were supported by larger nations so they always knew someone who was ready to use their veto to protect the aggressor. Finally, most of the nations in the League were aggressors and therefore that mad it difficult for the League to punish them. One of the major weaknesses of the League was the absence of large and important nations. Germany was not a member until 1926 and left in 1933. The USSR did not join until 1934 whilst Japan left in 1933 and Italy left in 1937. Most importantly America never joined the League and this left the League lacking a lot of authority and power. The League never had total commitment from any of the larger nation in it anyway they all stuck to their own agenda, ignoring the League whenever needed. Because of this the League never had a real leader. When Woodrow Wilson proposed the League it was thought that it would be logical for America, the world's strongest nation, to lead it. But with America pulling out it left Britain and France to lead the League. ...read more.

Conclusion

The thing that put the final nail in the League of Nations coffin was the Wall St. Crash. It plunged the world into depression and eventually war. But unusual events like this happened a lot in the 1920's/30's. This just left the League helpless they could not prevent nor cushion the blow when things like this happened. These unusual events would test the UN today let alone its predecessor the League. The League just happened to be around the wrong place at the wrong time. At the end of the World War people were trying to get their own lives/countries back together they weren't concerned about what other people were doing. The League was formed out of a lot of countries that were just recovering from considerable damage. If the League had been formed a few years later it would have probably survived but because those times asked for an organisation of its kind immediately, the League was rather rushed. Conclusion There were many inherent weaknesses in the League but the unusual events of the 1920's/30's tested the league too much. The League needed to have a slow start to build up strength and unity over time but because of its flaws and the rush it was in due to events of the time it didn't get this opportunity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why America didn't join the league of nations.

    The defeated powers were not consulted about the league and were not invited to join. The victorious powers did not really agree among themselves about the League. A system of colonial commands was also set up. Based in Geneva, the League proved useful in settling minor international disputes, but they

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail in the 1930's?

    disputes were much smaller and with smaller countries so could actually make a difference to them with economic sanctions, they needed help from leading countries in helping or stopping them from whatever it maybe. Also if they were smaller, it may make France or Britain more likely to put forward troops to fight.

  1. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    It had achieved its aims of acting as an offensive force against Perisa, as well as pushing the war out of Greece and into enemy territory. There were no signs of inequality at this point in the progress of the Delian League; however, this was a different case two years later.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  1. The League of Nations

    and in order for this to happen each and every one of the members would have to be satisfied with the requirements. Unfortunately, the U.S. was a world power and they were not willing to give up any of their rights for peace, hence the failure of the League of Nations.

  2. How Far Do You Agree That It Was Clear From The Beginning That The ...

    These events damaged the League as it showed from the outset that perhaps the League was not going to uphold peace when its member states (especially the most influential ones) were involved. Or perhaps the League did not have the strength to oppose the member states wishes or could not afford to lose their membership.

  1. Discuss the strengths and the weaknesses of the League of Nations and explain whether ...

    across the globe, Britain and France both have territories in the far east, this helps put the League across as a worldwide force, not just one restricted to Europe and parts of Asia.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    The Covenant of the League made it clear that sanctions must be introduced against the aggressor. A committee was immediately set up to agree what sanctions to impose. But sanctions would only work if they were introduced quickly and decisively.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work