• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the League of Nations too idealistic for it's own good

Extracts from this document...


Was the League of Nations too idealistic for it's own good? I think that the League of Nations was too idealistic for it's own good. The League was set up after the First World War, and it was based on Woodrow Wilson's 14 points. It's main aim was to avoid another world war. At the beginning there were 42 member nations, although more countries joined as time went by. To show the good intensions of the League they decided not to have an army. This was too idealistic for it's own good. This is because they thought people would listen to them, also they thought the member nations would provide them with an army if it was needed. ...read more.


kick the country out, however this did not happen in 1923 when 5 Italian surveyors were shot and killed on the Greek side of the Greek-Albanian frontier. Mussolini, the new Italian leader took advantage of this situation and invaded Corfu. This completely went against the League. However the other member nations did nothing as Mussolini was quickly gaining power and did not want to get on the wrong side of him so of course nothing happened. This again showed that the League was too idealistic because they thought that all the member nations would listen to what they said and of course they did not all the time. ...read more.


However in some ways the League was not too idealistic; like in their humanitarian work. They managed to help refugees and former prisoners of war get back to their home country. Also they blacklisted four German, Dutch, French and Swiss companies which were involved in illegal drug trade, so that no other company would trade with them and stop the drug trade. This worked and people stopped trading with them. They also set worker rights, in Tanganyika a railway was being built and the death of African workers was at 50%, they reduced this to 4%. Also they limited the hours that small children were. However most countries did not follow these guidelines. So maybe this was too idealistic for the times. ?? ?? ?? ?? Tom Banks ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    There was no question of who was going to win. One of the main reasons for this was that the league was at least seen to do the right thing in the Manchurian crisis as they condemned Japan for invading and although they didn't do anything about it they did, in the end, came to the right decision.

  2. Evacuation of Children

    Although this gives information, it does have limitations. She is only a teacher in one of thousands of schools in Britain, different children, different feelings. This is a negative view on the evacuation; other schools might have a positive view on the evacuation. So therefore this portrays evacuation wasn't a success.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work