• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the league successful in the 1920s?

Extracts from this document...


Was the league successful in the 1920s? The League of Nations was created in 1919 but didn't begin its official existence until January 1920. It was set up to bring the nations of the world together and act in harmony to prevent any future wars ever breaking out. The League of Nations was successful in the 1920s because of its humanitarian aim. They drew up suggested laws dealing with things such as child labour, sick pay and old age pension. The league also introduced a resolution for a maximum of 48 hours a week of work. As a result of this they improved the lives of millions of people. ...read more.


Because of this that meant the league was successful because countries were becoming friends and this was another factor that helped avoid war. The league operated fairly, in the assembly everyone could vote and all the votes had to be unanimous. Collective security in the league meant that the league was a success because the smaller countries felt safe because the bigger countries could protect them if anything was to happen. However the league wasn't completely successful in the 1920s. The league wasn't successful with disarmament because they didn't start to arrange a disarmament conference until 1926 and the conference didn't even meet until 1932. ...read more.


The league had selfish members in it like Britain and France who weren't always prepared to do things, the league didn't have USA in it. Without the USA the league was like a lion with no teeth they didn't have the USA to back anything up. Without the USA economic sanctions were quite pointless because if the league put a sanction on a country to stop it trading with other countries in the league it could always go to the USA for trade, which is just as good. So in conclusion, the league was successful in the 1920s because it managed to improve the lives of millions with its humanitarian aim. However it was also unsuccessful because the league was lacking the USA as a member and the USA could have improved it greatly. Jenni Calder 10FF 17/05/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did the league fail?

    Because the most powerful nations weren't members it meant that the league had to rely on the second rate powers. Without the USA, USSR and Germany the League of Nations had to rely on second rate and less influential powers at the time.

  2. How widespread was intolerance in the USA in the 1920's.

    intimidated the black population and used violence towards the black population including beatings and hangings. The Blacks lived in great poverty. In New York they lived in poorer housing than the whites but paid higher rents. If they tried to move to better housing they often received hostility from their neighbours.

  1. 'Without the new automobile industry the prosperity of the 1920s would scarcely have been ...

    This stimulated the USA economy. The USA sold an enormous amount of food stuffs too. While Britain and the allies were busy slugging out the war in France, the USA was taking over Europe's trade. The USA also provided the colonies with goods.

  2. Cold War Short Essays - Questions and Answers.

    People sensed a weakening in the USSR?s dominance after the wall fell. Another key feature was the reunification of Germany in 1990. Although Gorbachev was unwilling to reunite Germany because he felt they people would favour the USA over the USSR, he agreed because it would help to improve relations between the superpowers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work